Crinacle X Moondrop Dusk

General Information

DUSK.JPG


Model: DUSK
Cavity Material: 3D-Printed Medical Resin
Driver: 2 Dynamic Drivers + 2 Balanced Armature +2 Planar Magnetic Drivers, 3-Way
Earphone Jack: 0.78-2pin
Cable Plug: 3.5mm Single-ended plug / USB-C
Frequency Response: 10Hz-24kHz
Effective Frequency Response: 20Hz-20kHz (IEC60318-4,3dB)
Impedance: 14.5Ω±15% (@1kHz)
Sensitivity: 119dB/Vrms (@1kHz)
THD: ≤0.5% (@1kHz, 94dB)

DUSK_01.jpg

Latest reviews

cpu235

100+ Head-Fier
A great all rounded and safe option
Pros: - Neutral, safe tuning, does not sound boring as well
- Sounds good with the DSP cable out of the box, more bass with the DSP cable.
- Vocal sounds good for the price
- Cool faceplate
Cons: - Moondrop app
- Terrible 3.5mm cable, if you plan not to use the DSP cable you need to buy a better cable separately
- Many competitions at the same price point
- Tip rolling is annoying
I got these from a trade with a friend recently and this is a personal unit.

The unboxing experience for the Dusk is fine for the price point, nothing too fancy but it comes with all the necessary items (spring tips, 3.5mm cable, DSP cable, carrying pouch and the iems.)

I like the faceplate design but I personally would prefer a semi-transparent and darker shell, since I see glue inside the shell between the faceplate and the shell from the outside of the shell. I feel like using a darker, half-transparent shell would make it look nicer and more harmonious with the black faceplate. I do get why they chose a transparent shell though since they need to match their brand's aesthetic, so this is just my two cents on the design. The leather case is pretty nice too. The 3D print shell is really nice and fits well on my ears.

test.jpg


I know that many people mentioned that it has to be used with the DSP cable, but I did not expect how bad it sounded with the stock 3.5mm cable, I personally think it is terrible with the stock cable so I recommend getting another cable if you plan to use it without the DSP cable. I tried it with my Toxic Cable BW26 and it sounded a lot better than the stock cable. I think getting some entry cables from big-name brands would be a lot better as well and you should be able to get one under $100.

However, it does sound very good with the DSP cable and I think it is super convenient for most people. The Dusk is very balanced with a slight sub-bass boost, and it is a safe tuning but doesn't sound boring. Clarity is fine for the price, and you can hear most of the details that are in the music. It sounded slightly warm and I prefer it over cold-sounding iems. Soundstage is slightly above average, it doesn't sound too close in your face. Vocal is great with the Dusk as well. The DSP cable made it very simple out of the box as well, you just need a phone and you are good to go, which is what I really like about the Dusk. There is a hint of BA timbre but I think it is acceptable, if the vocals were slightly smoother it would be more to my preference.

I used it mainly without the app, due to the app being kinda janky, I did try it with the other tunings with the app but I feel like the default DSP tuning sounded the best so I just uninstalled it and use it without the app. I saw some people saying the DSP cable has some QC issues but I haven't encountered it yet. I am using iPhone 15 and didn't hear background noise as well.

Also if you were to tip roll the Dusk, I found that many tips would slip out of the nozzle as it does not have a lip on it, so I just use the stock Moondrop spring tips and call it a day.

Tuning-wise it is more balanced and more all-rounded than the typical Moondrop offerings such as the Katos. I personally preferred it over the Dunu Davinci that I sold recently as well as I think the Dusk is less fatiguing to listen to for a longer period and it sounded more balanced than the Davinci. The Davinci has more bass and is more fun but more fatiguing to listen to for a longer period.

Overall I do like the tuning of it, the MSRP is fine in today's market but you have many options now. It is a great all-around iem if you plan to use it with the DSP cable. I am using this iem mainly as a travelling iem and it serves me well. I would definitely recommend it to my friends who are getting into the audio world if they are looking for an iem if they are fine with using the DSP cable.

Small update: AZLA SednaEarfit eartip is a great fit, it has the grip to stay on the nozzle and gave me a way better seal than the spring tips, will give it 4.5 stars paired with the ALZA tips.

Bass: 7.5/10
Mids: 8.5/10
Treble: 8/10
Tuning: 8.5/10
Fatiguability (higher score = less fatiguing to listen to): 8.5/10
Price to performance ratio (MSRP): 7/10
Overall: 8/10 (4 stars)
Last edited:

baenkhai310

New Head-Fier
A long journey
Pros: - Detailed mid with coherency.
- Great, natural timbre.
- The soundstage is slightly expansive and the imaging is pinpoint.
- Vocal eccentric.
Cons: - The DSP cable.
- Sensitive IEM.
- Analog tuning needs great sources, and power to truly shine.
In this review, I will only talk about the sound and my experience with the IEM.

Long story short, the Dusk is an IEM that requires considerable time for people to understand what it can do and how to use it correctly (At least for me).

On 9/2024, I got my Dusk and listened to it on the DSP cable for the first time. My impression that time can be concluded into one word: "BASS". As a former user of B2, the bass of the Dusk at that time was kinda too much for me. However, the more I listened to it the more I came to get addicted to how rumbling the Dusk sounds while maintaining the clarity of the midrange, regarding the superior technicalities compared to the B2. You can say that the DSP tuning is to the liking of the majority of people, who listen mostly to rap, pop, and EDM. On the other hand, although the mid provided great clarity and coherency, the vocals could never shine on this kind of tuning as it became the very opposite of forward. Most of the time, I found the vocals sank in the track where different instruments and things were going on.

Turning to the 3.5mm cable, as I plugged directly into my computer, I found myself in great disappointment. It was just like the Dusk lost its strong point: the bass was anemic and amateur while the treble was way too bright and sharp for my ears. Fortunately, the soundstage and mid did not change. The vocal seems a bit forward compared to the DSP tuning. But to be honest, the dusk with 3.5mm cable sounded so bad that I even found some KZs sounded better. At that time, I felt like my money was wasted on the Dusk in analog mode and promised to only use it with the DSP cable.

That way, my taste in music gradually turned from vocal eccentric tracks to Rap. I craved nothing but the high-quality bass that the Dusk provided. However, as time went on, I realized that the DSP cable was too much of an inconvenience. The first reason is the fact that I could not connect it to some devices, in particular, my iPhone. You know, sometimes you just want to go outside with a pair of IEM listening to music but with my iPhone and the Dusk, I could not do it, which is extremely frustrating. The second reason is the sensitivity of the Dusk. The more I used it, the more I felt like there was a hissing noise while playing classical tracks. I do not know if this is due to the DSP cable or the Dusk itself but that noise is right there. That was also part of the reason why I mostly listened to Rap using Dusk as the bass could kind of make me forget about the hissing noise.

This is when I started to be depressed about the Dusk. I even had the intention to sell it as I thought this IEM was not worth it. Listening to the DSP tuning of the Dusk did me dirty as all I cared about was bass and how it hit in rap songs. I no longer cared about other things such as mid, treble, or soundstage. "If an IEM hits bass the hardest, it is the greatest" - kind of mindset. Fortunately, it came to an end.

As I researched ways to make my Dusk worth the money, I found out that the Dusk in analog mode takes a dedicated amount of power and source. So I chose a portable one that can provide those: FiiO Q3.

Now we are talking, the Dusk in analog mode with a great source is the IEM that I consider worth the money (or maybe this is the doing of Fiio Q3). It is nothing like the DSP mode, the Dusk in analog mode can be seen as a vocal-eccentric IEM. I am not great at describing things so in summary, it sounds like a B2 with greater technicalities, timbre with elevated high mid. The bass is not much but tighter and has enough thumps. High mid is like the very main point of the Dusk: Sounds extremely smooth but no sharpness is present. Vocals now feel natural and forward. And the most important things are imaging and soundstage gets taken to another level, which makes the experience of listening to the Dusk feel like the singer is right in front of you.

The hissing noise that I mentioned is gone using a 4.2mm balanced cable (it is still there using a 3.5mm cable so I guess that noise is related to the sensitivity of the Dusk).

Overall, it was a long journey to finally properly use the Dusk. Right now, I can say that the Dusk is worth my money (or maybe this is the doing of FiiO Q3, I never know). It goes to my taste as the vocals and instruments really shine and feel natural on this IEM. I also really enjoyed the Dusk in DSP mode but I wish I could have this experience without using DSP. Maybe I will get a mk2 in the future.

Thank you for reading this post till the end and I wish you guys a happy new year.

1735802582479.png
B
baenkhai310
sry for the low quality image :(

Enther

100+ Head-Fier
For the price I'm not convinced ...
Pros: Neutral profile.
Its tone and timbre are very good and coherence.
I like the depth in the soundstage.
Great imaging.
Good and effective insertion for passive isolation.
Nice aesthetics.
Cons: It needs a bit more dB in subbass.
Its dynamics could be improved.
I would have liked more resolution.
The soundstage doesn't feel expansive.
It doesn't have that "engaging" factor.
Using it with DPS or analog? It's a debate that can be confusing.
There is the Blessing 3 which is cheaper, sound quality is comparable and has a better cable.
INTRO
Welcome to the Critica Actual review. Today it's time to talk about an iem from a brand that I like the way they do things. The moondrop dusk. This iem is a collaboration with the critic Crinacle. Hated by some and revered by others.
On the channel we have been moving up the Moondrop category. I tried the Aria, I loved it for the price and today I consider it one of the most fun I've tried from the brand. Then we saw the Kato, an iem that left me wanting more, although it wasn't bad at all considering the release date, competition. Then we saw the supposed improvement of Moondrop's most famous iem, the Blessing 2. Version 3, as I said in the video, is an iem that honestly isn't a big leap in sonic quality compared to the Blessing 2 but, even so, I do consider it to be a good product for certain functions and one of the best for the price.
This Dusk seems to repeat the same. A profile that isn't all-terrain but is less clinical than the Blessing 3 but still bears that Moondrop signature. A style more focused on neutrality and "correct sound" rather than an explosive, musical sound... as other iems can exhibit.

Captura de pantalla (1424).png


UNBOXING SECTION (IMPRESSIONS)
The Moondrop Dusk unboxing feels very complete. One of the best I've seen for these prices. Well presented and you have everything. Later I will go into the quality of certain components.
We have a large box where there are compartments to store things. We have the iem well stored, a very very good case. Now you will be seeing it better. It feels very solid, spacious...one of the best cases I've tried.
On the other hand, we have the cables. And yes, I say cables because this iem has a 1.2 meter cable with 2 pins to 3.5mm jack and another cable to use it with a mobile device or computer since it has a USB-C termination. In my case I have tested it with Android in version 14 and it works well. The application also allows you to equalize and adjust the sound to your liking.

Captura de pantalla (1423).png


As if that were not enough, we have ear tips of different types and sizes and the classic waifu and papers of the brand.
The iem itself is medium-sized, tending to large, transparent and with a plate that reminds of a higher range like the Moondrop DarkSaber. I find it pretty and elegant; honestly I like it more than the Blessing 3. Its insertion is deep and has good passive isolation. Similar to the Blessing 3 but slightly worse than the Variations.
In general it feels truly complete and I really appreciate that so many things come. So far so good. Now what I like least is the feel of the cable. I don't say quality because I think it will be similar to others, but the feel of the original 3.5mm Jack cable is somewhat cheap. A very malleable cable that doesn't seem to me to be up to par with the IEM. The other cable feels better.
Another thing that I found worthy of mention is that the dark plate feels placed on the cover in a more rudimentary way. A blend with the rest of the body of the IEM or making the entire IEM more homogeneous would have been a better idea.
SOUND
Before evaluating the sound, it should be noted that, as I said, this product has two cables. And yes, there are sonic differences. The USB-C cable allows you to equalize the sound with the application. Honestly, you can make it more fun or leave it more to your liking, but I think the Moondrop signature dissipates if you equalize it. Also, I feel that with the DSP cable you lose some resolution and small nuances. Regarding the sound, I want to make it clear that my words from now on will refer to the wired version. The 3.5mm Jack.
We have a neutral profile, not very different from the sonic experience of the Blessing 3. Classic Moondrop profile, refined but honestly does not give you a feeling of wow or leave you wanting more. The best thing about Moondrop IEMs is usually the tone and this one is no exception. Good IEM for genres such as jazz or acoustic.
The bass is emphasized or more than the Blessing 3 version, the mids are clear and detailed, and the highs have a good extension without being tiring. The goal of this setting is to offer a pleasant listening experience for a variety of musical genres, without losing details but honestly it does not seem to me to be the most musical sound. It is correct, quite technical in some areas, but that's it.

Captura de pantalla (1422).png


SOUND SECTION – BASS
The Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk’s bass range is one of the most improved points compared to other models in the Blessing series. Crinacle wanted to bring more body and depth to the low frequencies, maintaining control, but avoiding excess reverb.
The sub-bass is deep and present, although I would have liked more rumble. There is more extension in the lower frequencies than in other models, giving a deep, satisfying punch that is felt without being oppressive. The mid-bass has good presence, but without muddying the mids. This is key, as the Dusk maintains a detailed texture in this range, allowing low instruments (such as bass or kick drums) to feel impactful, but defined. There is no “bloat” feeling.
As for speed, the bass is fast and well controlled. It doesn’t have the slowness or lack of definition that sometimes appears in IEMs (in-ear monitors) with emphasized bass.

SOUND SECTION – MIDS
The Dusk’s mids are detailed and well balanced, ensuring excellent reproduction of vocals and melodic instruments, such as guitars, pianos or strings. It is a midrange that I would call audiophile because it is correct, without excesses, very good decay, but it is not for everyone because it is not quite as musical as I would like for more all-rounder use.
Even though the bass has a boost, the lower mids maintain good clarity and are not invaded by the bass. This helps the music maintain a good sense of warmth without getting dirty. Instruments that inhabit this area, such as guitars or certain keyboards, have a rich and natural texture.
This is where the Dusk excels in terms of detail and clarity. Vocals, Both male and female, are especially clear and present. Vocals have an excellent position within the mix, sounding natural and without standing out in an artificial or exaggerated way.
The high mids are also well worked, avoiding any kind of peaks that could result in hearing fatigue or sibilance. This is especially noticeable in the reproduction of female voices or instruments such as violins, where the high mids can stand out but without being annoying or too bright.

SOUND SECTION – TREBLE
The Dusk’s treble range is one of the most balanced points. They are characterized by offering extended and well-controlled highs, with enough brightness to maintain clarity and detail, but without causing fatigue.
The Dusk’s treble has a good extension, meaning that it manages to reach the highest frequencies without losing presence. This extension adds a nice “air” to the music, improving the sense of space and depth in recordings. They do not have an excessively bright or metallic signature as could sometimes be noticed in the Quintet, which is ideal for long listening sessions.
The Dusk offers a good ability to reveal micro details in the high frequencies. Sounds like cymbals, clicks, high strings or reverberations are clear and defined, allowing you to hear even the finest nuances in recordings. This is especially useful in genres like classical music, jazz or acoustic music
In short, the highs polish and complete the tonality of the IEM giving a good, classic moondrop feeling of air and spatiality, although this is surprising because these IEMs are not the widest in terms of soundstage.

SOUND SECTION – TECHNICALITIES
The resolution of the Dusk is excellent for its price, although not the best. It is noticeably a step better than, for example, the Clavelon Delta, an IEM that is very, very good for the price.
Instrument separation is another strong point. Although it is not the IEM with the widest soundstage, the Dusk handles separation with great skill, allowing each instrument or track in a mix to remain well defined and easy to identify, even in dense or complex compositions, and, together with the air in the treble, it tends to open up the stage more than its soundstage can, which is a little more disappointing.
It does not feel as wide or expansive as some higher-end IEMs from the brand such as the Variations. There is a good sense of depth and three-dimensional space, but smaller. It feels like a triangular scene. It tends to show the sound more centered and up front, expanding just enough on the X axis.
Where the Dusk stands out is in the placement of instruments. That is, in its image. The ability to accurately position sounds in the soundstage is the best thing about the iem for me. You can clearly locate the position of instruments or effects within the sound space, which makes it an excellent iem for musical genres that rely on good spatial localization, such as jazz or orchestral music.
Lastly, to keep it short, in terms of dynamics, it is simply decent. Nothing remarkable, although if we look at the price I think it is not good. For me it tends to be flatter and lacks in this area.

SUMMARY SECTION
There is little more to say about this iem. As you may have heard, we are not dealing with a top product or quality price. Certain English or Asian reviewers have put this product as one of the best for less than €800. It is a slight improvement over the Blessing 3 but it is still behind the Moondrop Variations, which is for me, the truly good and complete sub-600€ headphone from the brand.
The Dusk is an iem that not everyone will enjoy. It doesn't have very strong bass for bassheads, but it does have a good midrange, highs that sometimes lack spark or a bit more of a feeling that a higher range gives... it reminds me sometimes of the HD6 series from Sennheiser. It's not as flat as the HD600 but it feels kind of like the HD650 or 660. I don't see this IEM standing out in technical aspects or at least I expected it to be better in resolution, soundstage and dynamics. I think it can be good for genres like jazz or acoustic but little else.
That's it for the review. I hope you enjoyed it and we'll see you soon.

Captura de pantalla (1425).png


COMPARISONS
Mangird Tea Pro
Sound profile: It also has a slight "V" with a focus on warmer mids and a bit more energy in the highs compared to the Dusk.
Strengths: Excellent for genres with an emphasis on vocals, good timbre in instruments and detail. Punchy bass.
Weakness: The bass is not as deep as on the Dusk, and some may find the highs "relaxed", which can like people who search a warm iem.

Ziigaat Estrella
Sound profile: Its focus is on an attractive signature. It offers clarity in the mids and highs, but it is less warm.
Strengths: Excellent resolution and playfulness. Suitable for those who prefer a somewhat colored sound. It has more of an open soundstage feel.
Weakness: The bass is compared to the Mangird Tea Pro (but better resolution/texture). Its timbre feels less real and its imaging is slightly worse than on the Dusk.

Moondrop Variations
Sound profile: More focused on sub-bass and extended highs, with a flatter and more technical mid response.
Strengths: Deep and authoritative sub-bass, excellent separation and imaging. Highly detailed and accurate in the highs.
Weakness: Some may find the mids a bit more withdrawn, especially compared to the Dusk and Mangird Tea Pro, making it less emotional for vocals or melodic instruments.
Last edited:

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top