NymPHONOmaniac

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Lush timbre, weighty balanced tonality
Cons: Slow attack, poor clarity, average technicalities
Out of the Blue CAT EAR MIA Mini-review:

mia1.jpg


TONALITY: 7.5/10
TECHNICALITIES: 7/10
CONSTRUCTION&DESIGN: 8.5/10
VALUE: 7.5/10

The Plus:
Warm thick immersive sound, balanced yet fun tuning, cohesive tonality-musicality, mostly pleasant mellow mid-bass slam, interesting construction and design, lush timbre, wide soundstage with right eartips, price drop from 100$ to 70$, cool package and case and OK cable

The SO-SO: Subpar technicalities, no silence to be found anywhere, poor imaging, darkish treble with slight micro-details boost that feel unbalanced, muddy layering, slightly recessed dry female vocal, bad bass articulation-control, poor clarity-definition, price value

I do like the thick-bassy-sounding MIA, it's what I call a guilty pleasure because it isn't a mature-sounding IEM neither a very talented one in terms of technicalities like attack snap and speed, clarity, imaging and natural decay. But at least tonality holds up together naturally and have a dynamic laid back sound that entertains you and doesn't agress you with harsh treble or overly boomy-bleedy bass.

Construction is refreshingly great and quite unique for bullet shape IEM. It feel extremely solid and has a well-embeded metal MMXC connector. It feel quite premium for the price. Cable is good too, and even greater if you believe in the miracle of -196℃ Cryogenic treatment, cause yes it seem everything got this luxury treatment. Anyway, cable do sound clean! Packaging have generous accessories of good quality including beautiful carrying case.

mia3.jpg


TONALITY is mellow V to W shape, with hefty mid bass, gentle mids and mid treble texture emphasis, upper treble being roll off rather fast. It's thick and well mixed as dark sirup, not maple sirup neither honey cause it isnt transparent sounding. Layers are dense and a hint grainy-unbalanced in texture. Timbre is still above average in terms of naturalness and the sound is fully bodied as a whole.

TECHNICALITIES are very average. Imaging lack clarity and space and air to be well articulated. Attack lack bite and definition. Layering can add up until saturation point. Bass is a bit boomy and extension is restraint but the slam is thick and weighty, well rounded and well balanced with the rest of the spectrum. Mids are lush, rich in texture and thick in body but a hint recessed and mixed up. Treble is crunchy and again quite natural in body density, though it lack sparkle and attack decay which can make some percussion splashy.

mia2.jpg
COMPARISONS:

VS Ibasso IT00 (80$):
IT00 is warmer and more organic in timbre, have better transparency and layering, its even darker in treble section but have better macro-resolution, its better balanced and less V shape, vocal sound fuller and wider, soundstage is taller deeper about same wide, timbre is more natural especially in lower-mid treble, bass is warmer-darker,

VS KZ EDX (7$): KZ is brighter more vivid and detailed, bass is better separated and controlled but less full and weighty and less boosted (so less rumble too), more W shape vs V shape for MIA, timbre is more textured-nuanced but a bit more clinical too, vocal are more intimate and centered, imaging is notably better, soundstage is deeper but less wide, attack is snappier, tonality is rougher and less permissive of harsh recording.

NO GIMMICK CONCLUSION:
Cat Ear trigger my attention with a cohesive dynamic tuning that merits further refinement. The construction is refreshing too as well as whole product presentation. Timbre and tonality is impressive for a chifi, though everything else doesnt compete with sub-100$ single DD like HZsound Mirror which is from another league and cost 20$ less.




PS: thanks to HiFi Go for the review unit.
Ichos
Ichos
Love the photo concept!

B9Scrambler

Headphoneus Supremus
Cat Ear Mia: Solid Foundation
Pros: Well-built earpieces with a unique design – Surprisingly restrained tuning (ie. Avoided tuning in any artificial “wow factor” which typically wears off quickly)
Cons: Lacking detail – Nasally male vocals – Fragile o-rings used for tuning system
Greetings!

Today we're checking out the Cat Ear's first release, the Mia.

A few months back I was approached by a peer about his new earphone brand and upcoming release, asking if I'd be interested in giving it a listen and writing a review. After being provided with some additional product details that looked promising, I agreed to give it a whirl.

The Mia is a single dynamic earphone with 8mm drivers. The traditional barrel-shaped housing is CNC'd metal with removable cables via MMCX connectors. There is also a simple tuning system in place via removable rubber-o-rings. A lot of major releases in the Chinese Hi-Fi scene this year have danced around that magical 150 USD price point. I was pleased to see Cat Ear taking a more reasonable approach to the Mia's pricing, dropping it onto the market at 99 USD.

How does the Mia do as the brand's freshman release? Let's find out.

IMGP4735.JPGIMGP4738.JPG

What I Hear

Tips: The Mia comes with two sets of tips, only one of which I enjoy using with the product. Starting with the Sony hybrid clones, I'm less enthused. The small bore bloats the midbass and constricts the sound stage which take away from the already minimal treble emphasis. Good tips, but not a great pairing with the Mia. The wide bore tips on the other hand? Those are quite nice. The wide bore helps balance out the bass, brings up the treble, and releases the sound stage.

Tuning Rings: Despite the measurements showing the Mia sounding virtually identical with or without the rings in place, listening says otherwise. Without the rings installed, the sound stage feels wider and deeper, midbass less bloated, and clarity improves across the board. I see no reason to use the rings, save for a slight improvement to passive noise reduction. My testing was done without them.


Treble is rolled off in the brilliance region with focus in the upper ranges being squarely in the presence region. This means the Mia is not particularly sparkly or vibrant. The lower treble peak doesn't really do much to counter the Mia's underwhelming detail and clarity, while leaving instruments presenting as harsh and brittle. This heightens an unnaturalness that pervades throughout the general sound. However, notes are dense and full which is quite nice, and backed by realistic attack and decay qualities.

The midrange is to my ears the most enjoyable aspect of the Mia, though it isn't without some qualms. For the most part it is well presented and retains good presence next to the bass and treble. Vocalists and instruments have a satisfying weight and thickness to them. Unfortunately, at times vocals can sound nasally and somewhat muddy, particularly with male singers, so I tended to stick with instrumental tracks or female vocalists which better suit the Mia. Timbre quality is acceptable, but somewhat unnatural as noted earlier, with sounds having a crispy edge to them.

The low end of the Mia is mainly focused on the mid-bass region thanks to a fairly prominent roll-off further down. This leaves the Mia lacking in visceral feedback with notes that should slam and rumble feeling soft and impact free. The mid-bass focus also highlights minimal texturing. Overly smooth bass can work when you have excellent detail and clarity elsewhere to back it up, such as on the BQEYZ Spring II, but the Mia kinda misses the mark. At least it's quick enough to avoid congestion on all but the fastest or most congested tracks. I'd avoid using the Mia with metal since rapid double-bass tends to meld into one long, wavy note.

With the tuning rings removed, the Mia's sound stage is quite wide and reasonably deep giving it a spaciousness that you might not expect given the lack of upper treble airiness. Imaging is a little vague off centre but picks up in accuracy and nuance the further out you go. Tracks can sound quite layered with individual instruments well separated, until you toss something particularly congested or complicated at the Mia. It just doesn't have the clarity to handle overly busy music leading to muddiness.

Overall I find the Mia to be too safely tuned. While I can certainly enjoy my time listening to music with it, the lack of detail combined with notable rolling off at either end leaves it feeling a bit lifeless. As an earphone to listen with while going about your day it is fine, but for more focused listening it falls flat. It's absolutely competent, but not quite as competitive as I was hoping it would be.

Cat Ear Mia.jpgCat Ear Mia & Friends.jpg

Compared To A Peer

KB EAR Diamond (79.99 USD): KB EAR's single dynamic has a heavier v-shape to it's signature. It has notably more emphasis in the brilliance region giving it a much more lively and energetic feel. That lively feel is backed by a looser, less controlled, splashier sound than what the Mia outputs. The Diamond is lacking in fine detail, just like the Mia, though not to the extent of Cat Ear's offering. I'm not really a fan of the way either presents the treble region. The mids on these two earphones are quite different. The Mia's is warmer, more forward, and thicker, where the Diamond's is leaner, more detailed, and brighter sounding. Sibilance is not an issue with either to my ears. I lean slightly towards the Diamond as my preference thanks to the notable increase in clarity and detail. Bass on the Diamond is significantly less balanced with tons of sub-bass power rumbling away where the Mia trails off. While I find the Mia's mid-bass a bit too prominent, the Diamond takes it completely overboard leaving it basically ever-present regardless of the track. It can be fun at times and works well outdoors, but I'll take the Mia's low end, even if, once again, it falls short to the Diamond on texture and detail. The Diamond's soundstage is tiny, and that is evident pitting it against the Mia. The Diamond images significantly better off centre though, with this advantage dimming the further effects move away. Track layering is quite similar while I'll give the Diamond the nod when it comes to instrument separation.

In terms of build, the Diamond looks and feels quite a bit more premium. The Diamond is significantly heftier with a more complicated contrast filled design thanks to the carbon fibre face plate with gold logo insert, and the large gold-coloured nozzles. Visually it's significantly more eye catching. That carries over to the cable which is twice as thick, more flexible, not that much heavier, and again, looks much more distinct. If I asked someone which they thought was the more premium model, I'd be surprised if they chose the Mia. The Mia is built just as well (and is more comfortable), it's just not as visually distinct. To some that will be a big plus.

While the Diamond is the more visually appealing and technically competent of the two, the extreme mid-bass, tiny sound stage, and splashy treble left me enjoying the Mia more on the same tracks.

Moondrop Starfield (109.00 USD): The Starfield is a benchmark product in my opinion, easily going head-to-head with earphones significantly more expensive. Sooooo, while the Mia was quite competitive with KB EAR's Diamond, I find it falls far shorter than the 10 USD price difference between it and the Starfield would suggest. The Starfield's signature is more balanced with better end-to-end extension, though still pretty tame in the brilliance region. It is more detailed and better textured everywhere with more accurate timbre and better male vocal reproduction. Where they are about even is in note control, and I do find the Mia to sound slightly wider, though not as deep. Imaging, layering, and separation are all less impressive than the Starfield.

When it comes to build, the Mia fares better. While the Starfield is definitely the more eye catching of the two with it's shimmering blue and purple paint job and deep blue cable, it has been plagued with reports of driver failure and the delicate paint chipping to reveal repurposed Kanas housings. I wouldn't expect this to be an issue with the Mia since their earpieces, to my knowledge, are unique to the brand (one of the reasons I was interested in it). And while I love the Starfield's lightweight braided cable, many found it to be somewhat flimsy and not overly confidence inspiring for long term use. The tighter wind of the Mia's cable has me thinking it will be a bit more durable, though the rubbery feel and slight stickiness has me preferring Moondrop's cable.

Overall it should come as no surprise that I prefer the Starfield. Despite it's potential failings, I find the tuning to be more mature and complete with a visual styling that is organic and beautiful. The mere 10 USD price difference further solidifies my preference.

IMGP4742.JPGIMGP4745.JPG

In The Ear The Mia's aluminum shells use a design I haven't seen anywhere else which is refreshing. The more traditional barrel-shaped housing is also a nice change of pace from the low profile, cable-up design that seems to be dominant nowadays. Lots of people seem to prefer a more basic cable-down design which the Mia satisfies. Of course, you can always wear it cable up if you want. Fit and finish is excellent with no misaligned parts or sloppy workmanship, though you might find the protruding MMCX ports to look like they should sit more flush with the body of the housing. Their placement is intentional since they hide a vent that is covered by the tuning rings when installed, and hold the rings in place. The metal nozzle grill is neatly applied. The L/R markings located under the body of each earpiece, directly in front of the MMCX port, feel like they're laser etched in place so you won't have to worry about them wearing off.

Going back to the tuning rings, I suspect they will be fragile in the long term since one was already snapped out of the box. I would like to see Cat Ear redesign this system. Maybe swap to a more traditional removable nozzle filter, or it they want to stay unique maybe try designing a twistable metal or plastic collar where the rubber ring would normally sit. Could even try a variable vent design similar to what Accutone did with the Taurus. Or they could ditch the tuning system entirely since the Mia sounds better, in my opinion, without the rings installed.

Cat Ear put a lot of emphasis on their cable which, like every other aspect of the product, has gone through cryogenic treatment at -196 degrees. Why is that important? Not a clue, but it sounds cool. The cable itself utilizes a familiar four strand wind similar to what we've seen from TFZ Secret Garden HD. While a bit more rubbery and slightly sticky than I'd prefer, it's far from the bouncy, sticky, Flubber-like mess that was TFZ's attempt. The hardware used is something I really like about this cable. The MMCX plugs are metal and very compact. The metal y-split is also quite compact with just hint of strain relief entering the bottom. There is no strain relief leading out the top since Cat Ear opted to install a metal chin cinch, a handy feature that is often absent (such as on the Starfield's cable). The straight plug is also fairly compact with fine knurling for grip and a small, stiff strain relief that, if we're being honest here, probably won't do much to protect the cable from major bends or tugs. While I quite enjoy actually using the cable, this style has fallen out of favour for the fancier, more flamboyant cables included with products like FiiO's FD1 and TinHiFi T3.

Pending you are using tips that seal properly, the Mia slots in place securely and does little to announce it's presence. I can wear these cable up or down for hours at a time. The only time I experienced discomfort was when wearing them cable down for a few hours. The length of the earpieces means they dip down at the end and put just a hint more pressure on the top of the ear canal. Eventually that turned into a bit of a hot spot. Taking a quick break helped, as did looping the cable up and around my ear which improved weight distribution. Isolation on the Mia is pretty average with the tuning rings in place, and slightly worse with them removed. However, once music was playing the amount of passive noise reduction provided was perfectly serviceable in moderately loud locations. You'll likely need to up the volume in noisy areas though, or better yet, switch to foam tips.

IMGP4748.JPGIMGP4752.JPG

In The Box The Mia comes in a fairly large black and red themed lift-top box. On the front is the usual branding and model info with the face of a cat lurking in the background, seemingly ready to pounce on unsuspecting passerbys. Flipping to the back you find a list of specs, features and measurements, along with location and contact information for the brand. Lifting the lid revels the earphones and cable nestled within and around a dense, dual-layer foam pad. Beneath lies another cardboard box within which are all the accessories. In all you get:
  • Mia earphones
  • MMCX cable
  • Black Sony-hybrid style tips (s/m/l)
  • Pink single flange wide-bore tips
  • Half-moon shaped carrying case
  • 1x pair of spare o-rings
Overall a pretty decent accessory kit within a fairly standard unboxing experience. I think tossing in a couple extra pairs of o-rings would have been wise since they're easy to lose and somewhat delicate. The Sony-hybrid style tips are a little stiffer and more glossy than the real deal, but they're close enough to be basically indistinguishable during actual use. The pink tips remind me of those FiiO included with their first earphone, the F1. While a little bulky, they are exceptionally durable and provide a fantastic seal. The included case isn't as flashy as what you get with some of the competition but it's more pocketable thanks to the flat design. The material used also seems like it'll be quite durable, but that's something we'll have to test over the coming months and years. That said, it has handled the last four months without even a spec of wear which bodes well for the future.

IMGP4754.JPGIMGP4762.JPG

Final Thoughts The Mia is a good starting point for the Cat Ear brand. While it hasn't completely won me over and is probably priced just a little higher than it should be, there are plenty of aspects I like. The housings look nice and are comfortable, the cable isn't flashy but in use is pleasant, and the easy going sound is great for long term listening sessions. Where the Mia stumbles for me is in the general lack of detail and texture it provides. This combined with a lack of upper treble energy and rolled off bass leaves it sounding somewhat uninvolved. Someone looking for a truly relaxed sound will probably be a lot more happy with the Mia than myself given my preferences usually lean towards thinner, brighter sounding products. The tuning ring design was also a cool idea, but in practice feels more gimmicky than practical and could use a redesign.

Overall I like the Mia and while it could use some fine tuning, it has me excited to see where the brand goes from here.

Thanks for reading!

- B9

Disclaimer A big thanks to Steve at Cat Ear for reaching out to see if I would be interested in covering the Mia, and for arranging a sample. The thoughts within this review are my subjective impressions and do not represent Cat Ear or any other entity. At the time of writing the Mia was retailing for 99 USD and could be picked up through various online retailers; https://www.catearaudio.com/product/mia

Specifications
  • Driver: 8mm dynamic
  • Impedance: 16ohms
  • Sensitivity: 105dB/mW
  • Cable: Silver-plated OFC with MMCX
Gear Used For Testing LG Q70, FiiO M3 Pro, Earstudio HUD100, Earmen TR-Amp, Asus FX53V, TEAC HA-501

Some Test Tunes

Supertramp – Crime of the Century
Slipknot – Vol 3 (The Subliminal Verses)
Daft Punk – Random Access Memories
Aesop Rock – The Impossible Kid
King Crimson – Lark's Tongues in Aspic
King Crimson – Starless and Bible Black
Infected Mushroom – Legend of the Black Shawarma
The Prodigy – The Day is My Enemy
Steely Dan – The Royal Scam
Porcupine Tree – Stupid Dreams
Fleetwood Mac – Rumors
Tobacco – screw*d Up Friends
Last edited:
C
Codename john
Funny you said that about QC issues with the Starfields drivers. The left ear went in mine for a couple of days then returned to normality out of the blue 🤔. Very strange ! Never had that happen to me before.
B9Scrambler
B9Scrambler
@Codename john Mine have been fine but I've seen a few complaints in various forums. Suspect any QC issues are the minority since it sounds like Moondrop sold a butt ton of the Starfield and concerns seem to be few and far between. Bummer when it happens to anyone though. Glad yours recovered!
C
Codename john
Indeed. Great review as usual bro 😜

kmmbd

500+ Head-Fier
Better Luck Next Time
Pros: Great build quality
- Sub-bass can be fun with some genres and tracks
- Fairly wide soundstage and above-average instrument separation
Cons: Too much bass bloat
- Nozzle is a bit thicker than ideal
- Poor stock cable
- Dark and bassy tuning will be rather divisive
IMG_8860.JPG


This review originally appeared in my blog.

Cat Ear is a new brand from Shenzhen who has gone for a rather feline-themed branding. The Mia (meow?) is their first IEM (and the only one so far in their lineup) and at $99 retail faces stiff competition from both the lower and higher priced segments.

Usually newcomers in the market try to generate hype by some sort of novel driver setup or offering absurdly good value-for-money on paper at least. Cat Ear has a similar trick up their sleeve: cryogenic treatment. Apparently both the drivers and the cable/connectors have gone through -196C cryogenic treatment, a process that includes treating the materials in <-190C temperatures which improves wear resistance and removes residual stress.

All that sounds quite complicated and fancy, but does that improve anything on the sound front? Let’s find out.


Note: the ratings given will be subjective to the price tier. Nappoler Hu of HifiGo was kind enough to send the Cat Ear Mia as a review unit. Disclaimer.

Sources used: Sony NW-A55, Cowon Plenue V, LG G7, Cayin N3 Pro
Price, while reviewed: $79. Can be purchased from
HifiGo

Build: The Cat Ear Mia is a bullet-shaped IEM.The entire housing including the nozzles is made of anodized aluminium. The back portion has a striking red color and is beveled from the rest of the housing, creating a rather unique design. The channel markings are in large font at the bottom of the housing, with a vent-hole next to them. The IEMs have mmcx terminations and by default there is a little rubber ring between the mmcx port and the cable joint. This apparently blocks another small vent and increases bass quantity, but I personally would recommend removing this ring because otherwise the bass is uncontrolled and bleeds into mids.

Overall, a no-frills yet solid build with subtle design hints that sets it apart from its peers.
4.5/5

IMG_8832.JPG



Accessories: You get 6 pairs of eartips of two different kinds. I went for the slightly stiffer pink-stemmed tips. You also get a Cat Ear sticker (!), some extra rubber rings for blocking the vent near the mmcx stem, a serviceable carrying pouch, and of course the cable.

Ah, the cable, the worst thing in the accessory pack. It’s got a very grippy coating that catches on to jacket zippers very easily. To make matters worse: it’s incredibly tangle-prone and microphonic. The build quality is decent to be honest but the ergonomics are all over the place. Moreover there’s the uneven braiding of the cable itself that looks very janky from up close. The cable alone makes the accessory pack a disappointment and that’s a shame.
3/5

IMG_8857.JPG


Comfort and Isolation: The nozzle is thicker than I prefer so the IEMs can slide out at times, thus not the most comfortable/unfussy fit out there. I think the stubby nozzle can make it more difficult for people with small canals. Isolation is average.
3.5/5


Now, on to the sound.

The Cat Ear Mia is a single-dynamic IEM with an 8mm PET diaphragm driver inside. Given the recent rage of Beryllium coated drivers the old PET diaphragm might seem a bit… lacklustre. Nonetheless, the proof is in the sound.

The Cat Ear Mia is a bass-forward IEM and can be called “L-shaped” in terms of frequency response skewness. The bass takes the center stage, female vocals sit right behind whereas male vocals and treble is at a distance.

The following impressions were made with the stock clear tips and stock cable. Listening mostly done on LG G7/Sony NW-A55. The rubber ring was removed.

Lows: With the aforementioned rubber-ring installed the bass becomes too muddy to have any definition whatsoever. Removing it results in a bloomy mid-bass and an overzealous sub-bass, but at least it’s listenable now. The bass lacks texture and just can’t keep up with fast basslines, with bass notes often bleeding into one another. Some basshead might like this presentation but I think the bass on the Cat Ear Mia is too distracting to be enjoyable across a range of genres. Nonetheless, it can get fun with some pop and rock songs so there’s that. Snare hits are also extra-juicy which is a guilty pleasure of mine.
3/5

Mids:
The midrange on the Cat Ear Mia isn’t as bad as you’d expect from the graph. Lower mids sound recessed but male vocals do come through for the most part. Female vocals get more focus in comparison. Vocals do sound somewhat nasal and don’t have the correct tonality, which I suspect is a result of a too early rise into the upper-mids. You do get used to it pretty quickly. Strings come through pretty well, however the leading edge of notes lack bite and energy. Overall timbre is colored and not really what I’d refer to as “natural”. Resolved detail is average, it won’t get anywhere as detailed as the resolution champs in this price bracket.
3.5/5

Treble:
The treble takes a nose-dive after 5KHz, resulting in a total lack of air and rather muted cymbal strikes and hi-hats. This dark-ish tuning would work well had the bass not been so boosted which results in a sensation of lower-res playback. Probably not what you’d expect when you’re spending $80 in the current market.

What little of treble is there is pretty inoffensive, but it’s just the bare minimum and IEMs at 1/3rd the price of the Cat Ear Mia does considerably better. A shame.
3/5


Soundstage:
Soundstage is surprisingly wide given the imposing bass and lack of air in the treble region. It has just about average depth but the width allows good left/right separation and can make songs sound quite engaging.
4/5

Imaging:
Imaging is average, mostly left/right. Instrument separation is, again, better than you’d expect given the signature. It won’t make you feel like you’re inside a 3D blob of sound, but very few in this price segment will.
3/5

Bang-for-buck:
The Cat Ear Mia is built well and has a mainstream tuning. However, the accessory pack isn’t the best, the bass is just too much and overall technical performance is below par, if not way below par. It does have the coherence of a single-dynamic but even the timbre couldn’t become a redeeming factor. The one thing that acts as a saving grace for the Mia: it can be a fun listen with certain genres (rock/pop) and has a pretty laid back tuning that can be a plus for the treble-averse.
2.5/5

Source and Amping:
The Cat Ear Mia doesn’t have a lot of amp demands at 105dB/mW sensitivity. It ran pretty well from the LG G7. I did like it most out of the Cayin N3 Pro (with tube mode engaged) but most dongles will do an adequate job.

IMG_8863.JPG



Select Comparisons

vs Final E3000 ($60): Given that both the Final E3000 and the Cat Ear Mia are bullet-shaped IEMs a comparison between them is rather apt. The E3000 also opts for a dark and bassy tuning but rolls off in the sub-bass region instead of the major boost that Cat Ear Mia offers. The midrange is also tuned differently with more laid back midrange tuning in the E3000 whereas Mia has a bit more aggression in the upper-mids especially. The treble has better extension in the Final E3000, and in turn the Final E3000 also trounces the Cat Ear Mia in terms of soundstage and imaging/instrument separation. The E3000 does lack a detachable cable — its Achilles Heel according to many.

For my money — I’d probably get the E3000 though if it’s dark and bassy that I want. If you need more sub-bass focus then the Cat Ear Mia can be a more attractive option.

vs Moondrop Starfield ($109): The Moondrop Starfield also has a warm tuning but it is more of a mid-focused tuning. The Starfield is a great option for those who need up-front vocals, in stark contrast to the Cat Ear Mia. Soundstage and imaging is better on the Cat Ear Mia, however. And the Starfield comes with an even worse cable so there’s that.

vs Final E4000 ($129): The Final E4000 “fixes” the lack of sub-bass on the E3000 and can be considered a wholesale upgrade in most technical aspects (soundstage/imaging/separation). The E4000 also has a detachable cable. So far so good.

However, the amp demands are kind of overkill for such a budget device. Most phones and portable DAC/Amp dongles won’t be able to exert the full performance of the E4000. For that, you’d need a good portable amp or DAP, in stark contrast to the Cat Ear Mia.

IMG_8845.JPG


Conclusion

For a debut product, Cat Ear could’ve done far worse. However, I do wish they did quite a bit better. as of now the Cat Ear Mia is average, if not overpriced. Current price is actually $20 lower than the $100 launch price but still — it’s getting outpaced by all its peers.

Cat Ear has nailed the industrial design (even though ergonomics need a bit more work), now I hope they focus more on the tuning side of things, and slightly better accessories won’t hurt either.

As for the Mia: I can’t wholeheartedly recommend it, alas.

Overall rating: 2.5/5
I find it overpriced given the performance on display

Review test tracks: https://tidal.com/browse/playlist/04350ebe-1582-4785-9984-ff050d80d2b7
Last edited:
RikudouGoku
RikudouGoku
I guess you could say that they have 8 more tries. :joy:

MundoHiFiOz

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Soundstage
Tunning options
Bass
construction
polite treble
Cons: Bass can be too much for someone
Cable
Cat Ear MIA review
About me:
Music lover and earphone reviewer, most of my previous reviews are in spanish

Disclaimer: Cat ear audio sent MIA in exchange of my honest opinion

Gear used:
Hiby r5, fiio q5s, tempotec IDSD plus, fiio m3 pro and xiaomi redmi note 5.

m5.JPG

About Cat Ear Audio (CEA):
Cat ear audio is a new audio brand form Asia and is part of Shunshi (Shenzhen) Technology Co., Ltd. You can find more in: https://www.catearaudio.com/about-2

About MIA:
This is the first earphone from Cat Ear Audio, it has an sandblasting aluminum housing, only one color available and uses a single 8mm Dynamic Driver.

m88.JPG


Specifications:
Driver: φ8mm Dynamic Driver
Frequency Range: 16-22,000Hz
Impedance: 16Ω±15%
Sensitivity:105dB/mW
Distortion:<1%
Plug:3.5mm stereo,golde-plated
Type:Closed,In-ear
Earphone material: Aluminium Sandblasting
Cable material: OFC silver-plated, -196℃Cryogenic treatment
Cable length: ≈1.2m

Packaging and accessories:

MIA comes in a very estetic box, they put deddication to the packaging and it contribute to a very satisfy unboxing experience. I would like to see more brands doing this instead of just giving us a poor packaging. Inside of the black box we can find a cardboard card, a handcrafted pouch, 3 pairs of black silicon tips and 3 pairs of pink tips wich are more rigid than the black ones. Also we can find a black cable and one pair of rubber tunning rings.
m3.JPG

The cable is probably the weakest part of this accessories, it´s an OFC silver plated cable but with microphonic issues. The mmcx connectors, 3.5mm plug, pin interface and driver are also elaborated with a cryogenic process that according with CEA, this proccess takes 72 hours.
The mmcx connectors feels very durable and i had no issues with them
mia7.JPG


Comfort:

This earphones are very small and light, they are comfortable. Noise isolation depends entirely on the ear tips used. The tips included in the box are good to achieve an above average issolation.

Sound:

With MIA you´ll get a bassy sound, wide soundstage and inofensive treble. The sound of this earphone can be change using the rubber tunning rings and this is a very efective modification to the sound.
With the rubber tunning rings:
Bass: very accented, punchy and massive bass. Mid bass is the most elevated part, this gives a very good impact and texture to the batteries and percussions.​
Sub bass is also extended but not as much as midbass, it has a very good rumble with all kind of songs and will satisfy any bass lover.​

Mids: Warmer sound and recessed mids but with enough clarity and weight. Voices sound natural without being forward and instruments have very good separation thanks to very accurate imaging and probably one of the biggest soundstages under 100$ specially in widht.​
Sometimes with bassy songs, bass can be too much, affecting the cleanliness and saturating the mids, also air instruments and violins will sound with thicker tones sacrificing nature for a much fun representation.​
Treble: Slightly accented without harsh peaks helping to achieve long listening sessions without fatigue. Its not as elevated as bass and do not sound bright, it has good speed and enought air to avoid sounding dark.​
m1.JPG

Without the tunning rings the sound of this earphone becomes more balanced and looses the powerfull bass, now mids and treble becomes more present.

Bass: Still accented but now mid bass isn´t as elevated as before, sub bass becomes more present and overall bass has more control now.​
Mids: Improve a lot in transparency and clarity, it becomes an all rounder earphone. With pop, rock, orchestras or latin rhythms you'll definitely enjoy without being concerned of the excessed bass.​
Treble: It has more air now, better extension and faster attacks. Overall feels with more freedom.​

Compatibility:

Easy to use with any phone or computer.
Tempotec IDSD plus: The naturallnes of the IDSD and the warmer reprentation of MIA is a winning match.
Fiio q5s: Q5s adds extra bright to the sound of MIA and like with IDSD, this is a very enjoyable sounding match.
Hiby R5: The warmer sound of hiby gives the sensation of more bass to the sound of MIA, also treble becomes softer and soundstage feels very wide and deep here.
m6.JPG


Comparisons:

Thieaudio Legacy 3: L3 has more extended treble and a less bass compared to MIA. It also has more detail in mids and smaller soundstage.
Urbanfun YBF ISS014: Much more balanced sound, less quantity bass and similar treble representation.

Conclusions: MIA is a very polivalent earphone that can be the top choice for someone looking for a bassy sounding earphone around 100$. The tunning rings are a very good and efective addition and thanks to a solid construction, nice packaging and positive sound experience, MIA stands as a very good contender in the 100$ range.
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Audio Fun
MundoHiFiOz
MundoHiFiOz
Thanks!
alucard177
alucard177
Nice review, now I'm interested in this IEM. I'm based in Mexico too by the way and I hope there will be a meeting for mexican headfiers one day.
MundoHiFiOz
MundoHiFiOz
@alucard177 there's a growing audiophile community in México, hopefully one day headfi organices one.
Back
Top