Reviews by Ralphee

Ralphee

New Head-Fier
Pros: superior build quality, natural sound, sensitive detail resolution, wide soundstage, comfortable fit, detachable cable
Cons: omits lower bass extension
 
 
On my quest for the perfect sounding IEM for mobile use I came across these headphones that are rather underrepresented in the forum. The Panasonic RP-HDE10 are technically quite interesting as their 11,5mm MLF (multi-layered film) dynamic driver is actuated from both sides by a "HD Axial Dual Driver Unit" — a double set of coils and magnets. Enough proprietary tech to get me enticed... 
biggrin.gif
​  On to my impressions:

 
 
Packaging
 ​
The RP-HDE10 come nicely presented through the transparent plastic window of a regular cardboard box. In the box is a rather voluminous hard-case with zipper, four sets of eartips (XS, S, M, L) a cable roller, and of course, the earphones. All in all, a standard packaging.
 
RP-HDE10_01.jpg
 
 
 
Build, quality and comfort:
 ​
In one word: spectacular! These headphones are a showcase of good industrial design. Their sandblasted housing is milled out of a single piece of aluminum, only intersected by the cylinder that contains driver unit and earpiece, and the gold plated cable connectors. All parts are seamlessly assembled and feel rock-solid. There's no company logo, and the only print are tiny L and R markers. Really, really good.
 
Size wise, the headphones are bigger than they appear on photos, but they still fit comfortably in my average sized ears. Because there are no vent holes, isolation is above average and there is no sound leaking to the outside. 
 
The detachable cable is quite soft and rubbery. Microphonics and wind noise are very low. This cable and the long strain relief of the L-shaped mini jack feel nicely solid and substantial, if not a little oversized, especially compared to Sony cables. Only the remote control feels a bit crude and plasticky.
 
All in all, these are some of the most substantial and beautifully engineered earphones I've owned. Every detail exudes "quality". No gimmicky styling, but purposeful design. Listening to the RP-HDE10, however, draws a less coherent picture. 
 
RP-HDE10_03.jpg
 
 
Sound quality (with iPhone 6)
 ​
My music taste includes all kinds of electronic music (mostly house, dance and trance) as well as jazz and latin music, R&B and soul. I prefer a rather balanced sound with a solid, not overwhelming, bass fundament. And I am very sensitive to harsh or sibilant treble. That said, the RP-HDE10 feel very ambiguous. Let me explain:
 
The HDE10 sound neutral and quite forward, with an emphasis on the mid range. There's a lush mid-bass and lower trebles are slightly elevated, yet there isn't really much depth in the instrument placing: everything is placed right in front of you, which contributes to that "flat" and "forward" sound. At the other hand, the headphones do have an excellent and sensitive detail resolution and a pretty wide soundstage, which makes them pleasant to listen to. Because of their mids-centered character, the HDE10 excel in vocals and acoustic instruments. Especially acoustic guitars or strings sound very, very good with these. So far, so good. 
 
The caveat, however, is the lack of extension on both ends, even if Panasonic claims a wide frequency range of 3 — 50.000Hz. The trebles are less of a problem here, as I merely miss the airy feel of, say, a Sony XBA-A3. I guess the dynamic driver just can't deliver upper treble as crisp and fast as a balanced armature would do. Thus, the HDE10 sound arguably a bit congested or veiled at the upper end of the spectrum, but the trebles are smooth, and without signs of sibilance.
 
It's the lower end that falls short. While there is plenty of mid-bass, lower bass and sub-bass are virtually non existent. This results in a somehow lifeless presentation of anything that involves a bit of energy. Then, the HDE-10 sound a bit like "plopp-plopp" — if the bassline plays just high enough. Lower bass is simply cut off. That behavior isn't just a bummer with electronic music, but also the weight of acoustic Double bass in jazz or Latin music is severely compromised. As long as you listen to the RP-HDE10 without comparison, you probably would call this a character trait, as their general presentation is so pleasant and refined. But if you start comparing, then you'll notice the deficit.
 
RP-HDE10_02.jpg
 
 
RP-HDE10 vs. Sony XBA-A3
 ​
I'll take the XBA-A3 as a reference here, as it comes closest to the sound signature I'm after. If you're not familiar with it, here are my impressions: http://www.head-fi.org/products/sony-xba-a3/reviews/15782 Both headphones are labeled "High-Res Audio" and both sell in a roughly comparable price range.
 
The HDE10, surprisingly, gives the A3 a run for the money in the refinement and detailing of vocals and acoustic instruments. Switching back and forth makes the mids and lower treble of the A3 actually sound almost crude and strident. Yet, the trebles of the A3 are well extended, sound livelier and more engaging overall. Switch back again, and the HDE10 suddenly sounds nasal and congested.
 
The bass of the A3 beats the HDE10 hands down. I'm not talking about the intensity (to some the A3 is a bass-monster), but about the linear extension of bass down to the lowest frequencies. The A3 reaches much deeper while the HDE10 really sounds cut-off. Sunscreem's "Sweet Life" sounds like a pop song, because the HDE10 completely omits the menacing bass fundament that underlies that track. The same on Al Jarreau's "Midnight Sun", where the acoustic bass is extremely faint, if non existent.
 
 
Conclusion
 ​
So, why am I loosing so many words here? Because I think the RP-HDE10 are, in some aspects, brilliant headphones. There's a lot to like about them. Yet, I am really torn between euphoria and disdain, and I think that's because they are too specialized into vocal and acoustic presentation. It really comes down to your personal preferences if you can get warm with them. If you merely listen to soft acoustic or classical music, you'll probably find them very, very exciting. If you're after an all-rounder that suits various music genres, or like a hotter tuned sound, these 'phones certainly wouldn't make you happy.
Ralphee
Ralphee
No, I didn't play around with EQ. My source is an iPhone 6, AAC (256 kbit/s) and mp3 (320 kbit/s). To me this is a good compromise for mobile use. Yet, I consider myself a discerning listener, and I do like quality HiFi-sound even when on the move.

I'm traveling quite frequently, using Bose QC25 in the plane, Bluetooth connection in the car, and the in-ears in between. Therefore I don't like to fiddle around with EQ. I like it when my headphones sound good "as is", and other IEMs have already shown that they can sound exciting without EQ or amps.

That said, the RP-HDE10 sure are exciting earphones which, interestingly, are able to deliver solid low bass down to 25-20Hz, if you connect them to a sound generator. They are probably just tuned way too unexciting. There's plenty of mid-bass which somehow purveys the impression of a well-rounded sound signature. Yet, listen to the same song with other headphones and you'll note that the RP-HDE10 actually did cut off half of the bass, and thus, half of the intended atmosphere. I'd best compare it to an impression of "B&W Zeppelin vs. B&W Nautilus" (for the lack of a better description): same song, but a totally different sensation.

Yet, the RP-HDE10 do have other valuable virtues, including their supremely fine detail resolution around the mids and their overall harmonious sound signature. If you are into vocal or softer acoustic music, they are certainly worth a trial.
Raketen
Raketen
Cool. Maybe not the typical bass I like, but Sounds like they might fit a niche I don't quite have covered in my collection although perhaps could be similar to Aurisonics Rockets. Thanks again!
Dopaminer
Dopaminer
Great review, and nice pics. I agree with your opinions.  I EQ mine with Astell&Kern`s `AKT5p` equalizer present.  This was created for the notoriously harsh and bass-lacking beyerdynamic T5p headphone, and in my opinion works wonders with the Panasonic.  

Ralphee

New Head-Fier
Pros: warm and deep, yet very detailed sound signature; superb sound stage for an IEM; manages the balancing act between "warm" and "analytical"
Cons: size, comfort and looks; average isolation with stock silicone tips
Long time reader, first time poster, it's time for some contribution to the forum: here's my appraisal of Sony’s XBA-A3, compared to its peers in the Sony Hybrid-BA lineup.
 
 
Background
 ​
I mostly use my IEMs out on the street or while traveling, usually connected to an iPhone. I listen predominantly to AAC (256kb/s) and MP3 (320kb/s), which doesn't give me bragging rights about the most audiophile setup, but for me this is a good compromise between sound quality and file size, when on the move. 
 
My music taste includes all kinds of electronic music (mostly house, dance and trance) as well as jazz and latin music, R&B and soul. I prefer a rather balanced sound with a solid, not overwhelming, bass fundament. And I am very sensitive to harsh or sibilant treble.
 
I was quite happy with the Yamaha EPH-100, yet I appreciate the typical Sony "sound signature" since a long time. I was particularly intrigued by the upfront and analytical sound of the Sony XBA-A1. That's not an obvious choice for a high-fidelity IEM, I know, but you really should try it out: I think it is a hidden gem for the price. The XBA-A1, for instance, can deliver some nice, tight bass in a quiet environment, but here's the catch: out on the noisy street you merely hear mids and treble, especially as you're constantly moving and a perfect seal isn’t always guaranteed. Thus, I was planning to upgrade to the XBA-A2, in hope for a similar sound signature with stronger bass. I'm glad I didn't, and here's why:
 
On a recent trip to Asia I went to the http://earphoneshop.co.kr store in Seoul, which I discovered through fellow head-fi members. This is an amazing store with a myriad of headphones on display for trial at your convenience. My three-hour session included Sony's whole actual XBA range: XBA-300, XBA-A1, XBA-A2, XBA-A3, XBA-Z5 and in between other popular makes for cross-reference. The Korean staff, certainly not used to patient clients, were probably puzzled what took me so long to settle for one single headphone. But spending the time was definitely worth it.
 
 
XBA-A3 vs. XBA-A2
 ​
First of all: the XBA-A2 is a very good IEM, and well worth its asking price. Initially, it even sounds more „engaging“ than the XBA-A3. But longer comparison reveals some significant differences that make it worthwhile settling for the A3. Both show a substantial bass fundament, yet they aren't "bass-heavy" IEMs: the bass is always present but it never dominates. At first impression, the A2 delivers a bit more bass than the A3, and is generally a bit more aggressively tuned, well suited for modern pop and dance music. Yet, the A3 is the more refined IEM by far. The bass on the A2 seems to peak in the typical bass drum frequencies, whereas the bass of the A3 extends much deeper, which actually makes it quite a musical sounding headphone. Thus, the A2 sounds more like boom boom, while the A3 actually plays complete bass lines with verve and intensity! It delivers a precise and quick bass if the source has it. Electronica, trance or drum ‚n’ bass music sound fantastic with the A3! Ditto with the "analogue" basslines of jazz or Latin music.
 
A similar picture at the other end of the spectrum: the A2 sports less refined treble, occasionally tending to harshness, and even slight sibilance, if the source isn’t of the best quality. It also sounds a bit more „metallic“ than the A3 which delivers treble as silky smooth and shimmering as it could be. Both IEMs emphasize on detailed treble in abundance, with the A3 being less fatiguing over longer listening. Compared to my aforementioned "reference" XBA-A1, the mids sound a bit recessed on both IEM's, making them sound a fair bit "darker". But, and this is important, go out on the street, and the "deep" sound becomes just right, still delivering a satisfying bass fundament despite all the surrounding noise. Last but not least, the A3 sports a significantly wider and airy soundstage while the A2 places instruments rather within your ears.
 
Admittedly, the over-ear cable design makes the XBA-A3 look a bit silly. Think sheep’s ears in front view, caused by the curved shape of the cable connectors. I earned quite a few looks when wearing these. (Yet, maybe it was because me constantly smiling over the fantastic sound quality.) This over-ear design, however, is much more comfortable to wear, effectively reducing cable wind noise. The IEMs stay in your ear, and aren’t torn out of position when you turn your head. The A3 remain always present in your ear because of their size, but long time comfort is better than with the much smaller A1, and presumably better than the A2, too.
 
 
XBA-A3 vs. XBA-Z5
 ​
The XBA-Z5 is an incredibly well-built IEM. A true collector’s item. Dimensions are virtually identical to the A3, but the black magnesium housing makes the Z5 look so much more „professional“ than the metallic painted plastic of the A3! The Z5, most importantly, sounds even more refined and relaxed than the A3, but not by much. I felt that bass intensity, quality and extension are almost identical. The treble of the A5 sounded a little less sparkling, but even a little more refined. Changing back and forth between A3 and Z5 leaves a similar impression as the comparison between A2 and A3: The lesser sounds a bit more aggressive and „engaging“ at first, but the latter excels with a more refined and rewarding presentation when you listen for a longer time. That said, the tonal difference between A2 and A3 seems huge compared to the difference between A3 and Z5. Is the Z5 the king of Sony’s XBA-lineup? Definitely. Is it worth the steep markup to the A3? Decide for yourself. I think it ain't.
jerryzm
jerryzm
Great review! I've had mine for a year now and yes they sound really good. Best purchase I've ever made.
 
Have you tried upgrading the cable? You'll be surprised how bad the stock cable makes the A3s sound compared to a custom made or even the upgrade cable sony provides.
Onny Izwan
Onny Izwan
IMO, the Z5 is more than a slight improvement over the A3. The extra 'refinement' translates more expressive vocal inflections, micro-details, textural excellence and great tonailty which, is like driving a Golf GTI to an entry level, no frills Golf (which is a fine drive in isolation).
Back
Top