Reviews by mark2410
Pros: Stupidly cheap. Fantastically well spec’ed. Beyond excellent value.
Cons: Screen is rather meh. No flash.
EE Rook Quick Review (ZTE Blade A410) by mark2410
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/810686/ee-rook-review-zte-blade-a410-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  A Stupid cheap phone.
 
Price:  £20 plus a mandatory £10 top up or £25 outright.
 
Specifications:  See here http://shop.ee.co.uk/mobile-phones/pay-as-you-go/rook-from-ee-payg/details  The key specs include 1GB of RAM, 8GB of storage, a 5mp rear camera, a front facing camera, quad core 1GHz CPU, 4 inch screen, 4G compatible with all UK bands and a micro SD card slot.
 
Accessories:  You get a standard, micro USB cable though weirdly you get a wired headset and yet no charging plug.
 
Build Quality:  Is it the best made thing ever?  No, no its not but for the price of it I have zero complaints.  Not only do I have no complaints id go so far as to say it’s great for the money.  Sure it’s plasticky but it’s all quite snuggly put together.
 
Aesthetics:  Well it’s not a looker is it?  It’s not that its ugly but I can’t say it’s an attractive device.  It’s bland and boring for sure, meh, it’s a black rectangle.
 
As a Phone:  As an actual phone, it was actually quite refreshing to use something that was so pleasantly sized using a phone sized phone.  I actually liked making calls on it.  It’s so nicely sized for my hands, it fit me so well.  Using it for other activities it was not quite so great, by stint of that size again for example typing on it felt odd.  The screen just felt so small when typing on it, it was perfectly usable but having spent so long with much larger devices it felt weird.  CPU and GPU though, they are not bad, crazy good really for the price but while its quad core its only clocked at 1GHz so it’s not the fastest thing ever.  Asphalt 8 did play but it wasn’t the most smooth of gameplay, don’t get me wrong I could play it but having played it so frequently I normally come in 1st place, on the Rook I came 6th.  Otherwise the 1GB of RAM meant it was a reasonably nice experience overall.  Quite spectacular how capable it all was given the price.
 
Sound:  While the speaker on the phone was a bit meh, not especially loud either.  The headphone out though, well that wasn’t too bad.  Nothing great but once more you can’t help but remember the price and marvel.  You can slap in a 64 GB micro SD card so long as it’s in fat32 and you’ve got yourself a dirt cheap DAP and has the potential for video too.  While the hp out may be a little underpowered, a little bland and flavourless, boring really but it so cheap.  I can’t ignore that it’s stupidly cheap to the point that its audio blandness melts away.  The clarity levels are not bad, the tone is fine too.  The only aspect where it really falls down is its lack of power and volume.  You really therefore need to pair it up to something rather sensitive and easily driven.
 
Value:  It’s so staggeringly, stupidly cheap and yeh reasonably spec’ed.  Its raw tech to the £ makes it supremely good value for money.
 
Pro’s:  Stupidly cheap.  Fantastically well spec’ed.  Beyond excellent value.
 
Con’s:  Screen is rather meh.  No flash.
Pros: Sound quality is outstanding. Stupidly cheap. Sound Quality is outstanding. Gorgeous case.
Cons: Bland looks. Bit of upper mid over enthusiasm. Wants a warmly rich source.
PMV A-01 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to PMV and their distributor, Penon Audio for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/810483/pmv-a-01-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Crazy cheap triple drivered hybrid
 
Price: US$69 or £48 (sans HMRC’s cut)
 
Specifications:  Cable material: silver-plated OFC, Cable length: 1.3m, Plug Type: 3.5mm gold plated, Speaker Impedance: 13Ω, Sensitivity: 110 ± 3dB, Distortion: <3% (1KHZ, 1mW), Frequency range: 20-20000HZ, Maximum power: 10Mw
 
Accessories:  3 pairs of Silicone Eartips(S/M/L), One pair Double-flange eartips, One pair Earhook, Carrying Case.  (Case looks awesome btw.)
 
Build Quality:  It would appear to be excellent.  The cable is crazy nice, the jack is great too and the buds are anodised aluminium.  On the whole it’s pretty great, looks and feels fancy, quality stuff.
 
Isolation:  So so.  It’s at the upper ish end of what you would get form a dynamic drivered IEM.  These have a dynamic in them for the bass and thus need be vented the same.  So you could get away with these is most uses, out and about or on a bus but I wouldn’t play too loud.  They aren’t great for flight or Tube but would do in a pinch.  Naturally though they are more than sufficient for getting yourself run over if you don’t use your eyes near traffic.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Excellent for the most part.  They need to be worn up if that’s and issue for you.  They also sit rather shallow which I don’t love as a rule.  They were comfy to wear all day and easy to get seated but I’d have like them a little more deep seating.
 
Aesthetics:  The black outer weave on the cable looks fancy, the buds despite being aluminium are just bland.  Nothing approaching ugly, they are just not particularly visually interesting.  Usually I love metal buds but these just didn’t seem to catch my eye.  
 
Sound:  This is where things matter and the sound quality is first rate, beyond first rate for the money.  They are triple drivered and while in comparison to other triple drivered IEM’s they may not be anything wildly special but what sets these apart is their price tag.  Seriously they are £48, how do they manage that?  That’s US$69 for US folk.  That is an unheard of price for something triple drivered and that sounds this good.  If they cost a ton more I could pick fault with things, like they can be a little strident in the upper mids and want to leap forward to shout at you.  However you can largely solve by pairing with warm, rich sources.  Then you see the price tag.  You just can’t stop coming back to that price, any time they don’t quite nail something perfectly you have got to keep in mind that the things you’re mentally comparing it to cost considerably more.  In fact acoustically only the RE-400 (which is still US$10 more) can come close to it.  However the build quality on the A-01 is very considerably nicer. 
 
Priced as it is, the PMV-A-01 is untouchable.
 
Value:  They spank everything around them, if you have the money grab a pair and unless your hardened bass head I’d bet you’ll be very highly impressed with what you’ve gotten for your money.
 
Pro’s:  Sound quality is outstanding.  Stupidly cheap.  Sound Quality is outstanding. Gorgeous case.
 
Con’s:  Bland looks.  Bit of upper mid over enthusiasm.  Wants a warmly rich source.
  • Like
Reactions: peter123 and hqssui
Pros: Very powerful computationally. Pleasantly controlled audio. Potential for modular enhancement.
Cons: Bland looks. Fly out of your hand rear coating. Wallet ouch.
LG G5 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Clove for the loaner.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/810010/lg-g5-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  LG and its modular bottom.
 
Price:  £480 which is about US$700
 
Specifications:  Go see GSMarena, LG’s own website includes bugger all information.
 
Build Quality:  For a top tier, and thus top priced phone it’s not quite perfect.  The join of the modular bottom and the rest of the body isn’t absolutely seamless and while I do understand why that is the case it’s going to bother some even if I barely noticed it.  It’s all rather nice, just not perfect.
 
Aesthetics:  Well like the fit, it’s all fine really but not quite, you know.  Its fine, it really is but it’s just not anything special to look at.
 
As a phone:  Really good.  Great CPU, GPU, tons of RAM so it can run whatever and make phone calls too.  Actually given how it benchmarked it’s a right beast of a thing, sure it gets toasty warm but this thing I’d bet will be able to handle even the most demanding games for a good few years to come.  I don’t love the power / fingerprint scanner being on the back but hey, I know some love it there.
 
Sound:  As the stock phone, so without the optional B&O module the audio quality was pretty good.  I couldn’t fault it.  Well not in terms of tonality or flavour, there is was a hint on the natural sounding side but just a bit.  The deepest lows and the highs were somewhat tamed but they could be down to a deliberate lack of power.  The output seemed unusually weak.  Both in terms of power and in terms of volume, and I wonder if LG did that deliberately to make the optional B&O module comparatively “pop” when tested?  It’s all supposition, maybe just LG really prioritised a black background and it’s so quiet because the bundled buds are relatively sensitive?  Speaking of which, the bundled buds, oh my god how unexpected where they???  Bundled buds are supposed to be total rubbish, you bin them soon as look at but these, oh no.  These are genuinely not at all bad.  They pair up really well with the phone too, of course too bass heavy but not ridiculously so.  It’s actually a bit of a shame that the only way to get them is to buy a G5 it would seem.  Otherwise try to stick to easy to drive stuff and don’t expect a rip roaring and dynamic filled ride.  Things a little plain, a little muted and you’ll be just fine.  Smooth, sweepingly gentle stuff works great on them.  For a phone its nice stuff.
 
Value:  It’s a flagship phone for flagship money.
 
Pro’s:  Very powerful computationally.  Pleasantly controlled audio.  Potential for modular enhancement.
 
Con’s:  Bland looks.  Fly out of your hand rear coating.  Wallet ouch.
Pros: Superb acoustic balance. Superb sound Quality. Superb tonality and timing.
Cons: Headband size adjustment was rather slippery. Won’t satisfy bassheads.
Somic v2 Headphone Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to GearBest for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/809323/somic-v2-headphone-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Somic, the hedgehog.
 
Price £32 or US$44
 
Specifications:  Connectivity: Wired, Application: Computer, Mobile phone, Portable Media Player, Plug Type: 3.5mm, Cable Length (m): 3M, Frequency response: 15Hz-30KHz, Impedance: 54ohms, Sensitivity: 95 ± 3 dB
 
Accessories:  You get a replacement ear pad set, some pleather ones and velvety ones.  Also you get a screw on 6.25 to 3.5mm adapter oh and lastly a handy Velcro cable tie to keep the rather long cable in order.
 
Build Quality:  It feels sturdy enough for the most part but the headband expanding slidy bits were very slidy and would do so with the faintest touch.  Not great but it didn’t really cause any issues in use.
 
Isolation:  Pretty much nothing, they are big wide open cans.  It’s therefore zero surprise that they isolate nothing.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Very good really, they are however rather small for a proper circumaural (goes around and not on your ear.)  They only just barely made it all the way round my ear so if your ears are bigger than mine, your get some ear squishing going on.  If that happens it will impact comfort levels.  For me they were fine and I could wear for hours before wanting them off.  YMMV.
 
Aesthetics:  They look alright, nothing fancy.
 
Sound:  These in most aspects are really easy to be wishy-washy about.  Then you come to how they sound and you’ll be blown away by just how you aren’t blown away.  El cheapo stuff you’d naturally bass / party cannons right?  You don’t get a real life, proper grown up pair of monitor esq headphones for this sort of money, you just don’t, right?  I had never heard of Somic before and even Googling these I could find almost nothing about them.  No one it seems has noticed them and that, dear reader, is a travesty.  These are excellent, so much more flat and balanced than I expected.  So more detailed, so more nuanced in the mids especially.  God the mids are good, so clear and articulate more than once I went back to check their price and that I hadn’t been sent the wrong thing by mistake.  Seriously £32, just how?  Not to mention that’s delivered too.  I feel like I’m missing something.  Their bass is so cleanly rendered, no big mid/bass hump, so well behaved before it then tails off at the bottom.  The mids are fractionally creamy but they’re so present and comparatively up front that there is gobs of detail despite its creamy and otherwise reticent nature.  Its gentle tonality, laid back and mellow.  So sumptuously melty if you slap on a little softly mellow jazz.  John Steven’s Red album is gloriously captivating.  The treble is fairly detailed, it’s not as great as the mids and bass but it’s got plenty detail, its also a little laid back, a hint mellowed.  It gives it that monitor esq, easy on the ear gentility but retained plenty of detail. 
 
It’s a dirt cheap real life monitor
 
Value:  Stupidly cheap, real proper grown up headphones for the price of a nice dinner.
 
Pro’s:  Superb acoustic balance.  Superb sound Quality.  Superb tonality and timing.
 
Con’s:  Headband size adjustment was rather slippery.  Won’t satisfy bassheads.
  • Like
Reactions: CoiL
CoiL
CoiL
Okay, You made me jump on those. 
Pros: Build Quality. Prodigious low-end output. Ultra-light and portable on ear. A bit mental.
Cons: Wallet ouch. Super highly flavoured sound. Zero isolation. A bit too mental.
Hisoundaudio HSA-H200 Pro Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Hisoundaudio for the sample
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/809117/hisoundaudio-hsa-h200-pro-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Hisoundaudio go 80’s retro!!!
 
Price:  Circa US$120 or about £83
 
Specifications:  Type: Dynamic, open, Driver Size: 40mm, Impedance: 36 Ohms, Sensitivity: 116db, Max SPL: 125db, Frequency Response: 20 – 20khz, Earphone Jack: 3.5mm straight, Cable Length: 120cm.
 
Accessories:  Spare set of foam pads and a little Velcro cable wrap tidy thing.
 
Isolation:  None.
 
Build Quality:  They may look like your 80’s flimsy metal banded headphones but they are nothing like that.  In the hand the metal band is more like a steel beam.  Its very firm, very solid feeling as are the plastic arm / bud / pad things where the drivers are situated.  Their plastic too is very solid and firm.  It’s all very, very premium feeling to the touch.  They may not look wildly fancy but they feel so solidly constructed it’s very visually deceptive.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Getting a fit was easy.  At first I had them vertically seated and they were fine but they were putting uneven pressure on my ears.  They don’t have any sideways flex so to get any I had to tilt the headband.  Rather than sit bolt upright I angled it backwards nearer to 45 degrees and then it fit my ears much better.  Once that was done and the clamping force more evenly distributed they were comfortable to wear for a good while at a time.  They do however clamp a little hard.  You could always stretch them out I suppose but their tight clamp means you could use them in a bouncy castle and they’d stay put.
 
Aesthetics:  I realise they aren’t the greatest lookers in the word but….. I like them.  There is something so childhood reminding and I like the colouring of them.  They are a little polite and non-descript but I find nevertheless I like them.  They are so retro styled by with modern colourings, it works for me. 
 
Sound:  Its presentation has air and space but its tonality is all about the warmth, rich darkness it possesses.  They are diametrically opposed attributes which makes for a weird sound. They want to be dark and richly encompassing, so heavy and oppressive but they have an airiness due to being so open.  It’s just not supposed to be like that, you can’t be both those things at the same time surely, but they are.  It’s a big 80’s Sony esq warmth that has a certain retro appeal, not from their head phones but from their Hi-Fi’s.  You see back in the day those headphones didn’t have much in the lows but these are solid and weighty bass beasts.  They haven’t the most deep nor most controlled bass but it’s a force to be reckoned with and I don’t doubt that those who need light, portable on ear headphones will be pleased.  It’s a like a tidal wave coming at you, relentless, massive, endless power.  Its mids are skewed to the bass end and thus are warmed and thickened.  The highs are lightly delicate and laid back 
 
These are squarely about the warmly dark presentation and bass. A mountain of bass, heavily veiled and crazy boom party time.
 
Value:  At circa US$120 (about £83) they aren’t cheap but if you need ultra-light portable on ear headphones you don’t have a lot of options.  They are also superbly constructed, super solid beasts.
 
Pro’s:  Build Quality.  Prodigious low-end output.  Ultra-light and portable on ear.  A bit mental.
 
Con’s:  Wallet ouch.  Super highly flavoured sound.  Zero isolation.  A bit too mental.
Pros: Great Isolation. Great natural acoustic feel. Smooth.
Cons: Single BA isn’t a big air mover. Too unaggressive for some.
Hisoundaudio HA2 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Hisoundaudio for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/808682/hisoundaudio-ha2-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  A GR07 but that isolates.
 
Price:  Circa US$100 or about £68
 
Specifications:  Drivers: Balanced Armature (1x), Impedance: 35 Ohms, Sensitivity: 108 dB, Highest Sound Pressure: 125 dB (1 kHz, 1 Vrms), Frequency Response: 20 Hz – 20 Khz, Cable Length: 118 cm
 
(N.B. these are spec as written on the box I got.  The spec seem to differ slightly to what others have reported.
 
Accessories:  You should get a heap of tips, a Velcro tie thingy and a little case.  However I didn’t get the case.
 
Build Quality:  It would all appear to be nicely build, the buds are all metal it would seem.  The cable its some braided with a black plastic sheath, which also would appear to be perfectly fine.
 
Isolation:  They do sit shallow but with the biggest foamies they came with, they sealed tightly and isolated very well.  Proper BA IEM levels of isolation.  I’d be fine using these on the Tube or on a flight.  Naturally easily enough to get yourself run over if you don’t pay attention.
 
Comfort/Fit:  The fit was a little odd wearing up as they have a strange shape but they fit me fine.  They do sit rather shallow which feels a bit odd at first but you get used to it very quickly.  I had no trouble getting a fit, seal and then wearing for multiple hours.
 
Aesthetics:  They aren’t ugly by any means but they are pretty bland looking.  Perfectly happy to wear them out but nothing hugely visually interesting.
 
Sound:  Here they start to shine a little bit.  Well not so much shine as they don’t do that, they are gently warmed but just a smidge.  There is a sonic purity to them, something honest sounding, pure and direct.  They are not thrilling party beasts by any imagining but they really are good.  They are rather like a BA version of the old GR07, the king of the generalists.  This is so alike it but with BA like traits instead.  Like it isolates great for one.  Its deepest bass isn’t a big air mover, its mids are lightly buttered and its highs are faintly warmed.  It’s a really ear gently sound.  Bass that’s a fraction above natural though it’s light and while smoothly agile.  It’s a bit strange as it feels, smooth, slow relaxed but of course it’s a BA so it’s highly agile.  It’s just very polite in how it goes about things, like going 100mph in a rolls Royce, you’re barrelling along but it feels as laid back and unhurried as if it were 20.  Mids too share that casually, unhurried feel.  They are a touch buttery and have a tonal purity to them.  Spacious yet towards the front and somehow intimately detailed but never in your face.  The treble is a little subdued in quantity, it’s rather softly relaxed too.  Rather a lot of detail but it’s just sort of there, there is no effort made to hurl it your way.  Especially if you throw colder more aggressive sources at it, they want to gently bring a little warmth.
 
A great audiophile generalist, which isolated well too, winner.
 
Value:  It may not be the mainstream success as its warmly soft, clean sound has to offer deserves as some will want more air moved down low.  These are not that, these are audiophile generalists, BA air movements, mids that only come from a decent BA driver.  As close as I’ve heard to the GR07 but these isolate.
 
Pro’s:  Great Isolation.  Great natural acoustic feel.  Smooth.
 
Con’s:  Single BA isn’t a big air mover.  Too unaggressive for some.
Pros: Sound Quality. Real buttons. Huge capacity. Sound versatility.
Cons: Pointless big screen. Wallet ouchy.
Audio-Opus Opus #1 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Hifiheadphones for the loaner.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/808376/audio-opus-opus-1-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  A touchscreen but with real buttons too.
 
Price:  £449 or about US$515 when VAT’s removed and converted
 
Specification:  DAC: Cirrus Logic CS4398 x 2EA Dual DAC, Processor: ARM Cortex-A9 1.4GHz, Quad-Core CPU DDR3 1GB, 32bit processor core, Operating System: Customised Android operating system, Signal to Noise Ratio: 114dB @ 1kHz, Unbalanced & 115dB @ 1kHz, Balanced, Frequency Response: ±0.02dB (Condition: 20Hz~20kHz) Unbalanced & Balanced / ±0.3dB (Condition: 10Hz - 70kHz) , Unbalanced & Balanced, Input: USB Micro-B (charging and data transfer), Charging Time: 4 Hours, Continuous Playback: 10 Hours, Battery: Built-in rechargeable: 4000mAh / 3.7V Li-Polymer, Dimensions (WxHxD): 72x112x18 mm, Weight: 185g
 
Build Quality:  Great.  Snugly put together and it all feels firm.
 
Aesthetics:  I like it, it looks fantastic with its leather case on.  That thing really looks and feels great being so snug and perfectly formed.  Without its still nice, but mostly a nondescript black obelisk.
 
Power:  It had plenty of headroom on it play anything you wanted.  The Oppo PM-3 and the Senn HD600 both ran rather well from it.  IEM’s in particular felt very nicely powered, not endless power but always sufficient to make things sing.
 
Sound:  It is quite the paragon of flavourless neutrality.  It wants to add no flavouring of its own and thus it was not only great sounding but it was highly adept at pairing with whatever you throw at it.  From cold to warm it just got on with things and happily, skilfully played back any musical style with the same lack of colouring of its own.  So very, very highly versatile.  It I could see really appealing to all us crazy people who have earphones by the dozen.  If for some reason you only want to have one kick ass DAP then this baby will pair great with them all.  Sure it’s not adding things mean that you don’t get the super sultry pairings nor hyper dazzling ones.  From Scissor Sisters to to Bach, its neutrality meant its musical versatility was crazy.  You really could chuck anything at it and it would perfectly playback without skipping a beat.  Everything, just everything sounded great on it.  It is one of the products that I can’t help but thinking it has a little something of Mary Poppins about it, practically perfect in every way.  Speaking of which they also sound glorious with the itty bitty q-JAYS 2.0.   Everything is just exactly how it ought to be, nothing boosted, nothing tweaked, everything has just been left as nature intended to give a wonderful sonic purity and clarity.  Of course that means it’s not a bombastic drama machine, nor is it a chocolate factory, what goes in is exactly what comes out completely unfettered by the Opus’s hang ups.
 
Value:  Okay so there is a bit of wallet ouchy ouchy but suck it up princess, if you’re after this sort of purity and sheer ability your wallets going to take a pounding no matter what you go for.  This one though is the most versatile.
 
Pro’s:  Sound Quality.  Real buttons.  Huge capacity.  Sound versatility.
 
Con’s:  Pointless big screen.  Wallet ouchy.
Pros: Pretty buds. Much junk in that trunk kinda bass. Fab cable.
Cons: Bass is subtle like a sledge hammer to the face. Upper end detail is a little diffuse.
T-PEOS RASIEL Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to T-PEOS for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/807332/t-peos-rasiel-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Finder X1 lookalikes.
 
Price:  I am told they are expected to retail for circa US$40, which is about £27.
 
Specifications:  Driver Unit: Dynamic driver 10mm, Impedance 8 ohms, Sensitivity: 110+/-15%, Power: 3mW / 20mW, Frequency Response: 20Hz to 15kHz, Weight 8g, Cord: 1.2m Twisted.
 
Accessories:  3 pair of silicone tips, a pair of Comply’s, a shirt clip and a “fabric pouch.”
 
Build Quality:  The buds are solid metal, chrome plated brass apparently, they look quite nicely put together and especially that braided cable.  It’s all rather good for the price.
 
Isolation:  They, unusually for a dynamic, are sealed it would seem and thus they actually isolate, isolate pretty well too.  You could easily get away with using them for most activities, the Tube and long flights are still a bit much but you could survive with them.  More than easily enough to get yourself run over if you stop looking where you going.
 
Comfort/Fit:  On both counts they were very good.  I had no trouble at all with them worn up or down.
 
Aesthetics:  I look at them and I can’t help think Finder X1.  It’s that same colouring, bare metal, inverse trumpet, tapering shape that makes them had to grip when removing.  The buds and the cable both look highly attractive to me.
 
Sound:  These are on the whole, when weighed back and forth, are all about the bass.  They are not the deepest unless well powered, they however can pump out a tremendous amount of vigour.  Big beastly roawwwwrrrrrrrrr kinda bass is going on here.  They truly love nothing more than encountering some pop, bass cannon fodder music so they can let rip.  They have much junk in their trunk and they aren’t afraid to wave it up in “yo face.”  Okay so I’m not much with that sort of colloquialism but I’m sure you get my meaning.  They are big in the bottom and they love to show it off to all and sundry.  It’s fun, a little bit over eager perhaps but it’s still just damn good fun.  It a bit of a hump, it’s a little bit disjointed and separate from the mids.  Not unlike a 2.1 system with a moderately sized sub that can’t go all the way down so has a big hump of it.  That big hump then stands out a bit from where it mixes with the midrange.  It feels a touch out of step but its goodly entertaining.  The gap however that puts some space between the bass and the vocals so vocals don’t sound unduly influenced by that bass.  Mids start rather clearly distinct and separate.  They aren’t bad mids either, somewhat behind the quantity of bass but its overall W shaped sound signature leaves them more unencumbered than the bass quantity would suggest should be.  It’s good.  The treble, it’s got a bit of distance too and it is not bad for detail but it’s really rather more subtle about it.  There is a little peak from time to time at volume and when amped but mostly it’s a light wash of shimmer.  No crisp hard edges anywhere that I noticed.
 
Value:  A W shaped, bottom end slanted, big bassy, consumer friendly sound that’s rather good looking and have a nice cable too.  What’s not to like for US$40?
 
Pro’s:  Pretty buds.  Much junk in that trunk kinda bass.  Fab cable.
 
Con’s:  Bass is subtle like a sledge hammer to the face.  Upper end detail is a little diffuse.
  • Like
Reactions: hqssui
Pros: First rate sound quality. Staging and scale are epic. Sumptuous mids.
Cons: Negligible Isolation. That upper vocal peak.
DUNU TITAN 3 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to DUNU for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/807020/dunu-titan-3-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  DUNU’s Middle Triplet
 
Price:  £95 or US$135
 
Specifications:  Driver: 13 mm Titianium drivers, Frequency Response: 10 Hz- 40KHz, Sound pressure level: 108 +/- 2 dB, Impedance: 32 Ohm, Plug Size: 3.5 gold-plated plug, Cord length: 1.2m
 
Accessories:  1 X case, 1 X 3.5mm to 6.3mm audio adapter, 1 X shirt clip, 6 pairs of silicon tips
 
Build Quality:  Very nice.  The buds are CNC’ed metal, the cable is removable from the beds and thusly replaceable if you kill it.  The cable feels alright, very light and flexible and the jack is metal as usual.  It’s a rather nice package.
 
Isolation:  Well it’s a very open IEM, hence the isolation it offers is very slight.  If you want isolation then this isn’t for you.
 
Comfort/Fit:  For me great.  I mostly wore them up which worked fine by swapping right and left.  With that done I was happy to wear all day.  Worn down I found their shallow fit made them regularly tugging and being distracting.
 
Aesthetics:  They look pretty good I think.  Nothing amazing but still quite nice.
 
Sound:  Like the other two TITAN’s the detail levels offered are superb, they are also open, spacious, airy and staging is unusually large.  Where the TITAN 3 starts to differentiate itself is in its sound signature. These are the middy, slightly richer, slightly creamy one.  Its definitely made with the midrange in mind and they are about the best mids I’ve encountered from a dynamic driver.  They are fantastic.  The nuance, the subtlety, the detail and all with a soft creamy coating.  Soft, smooth vocals are mesmerising.  They really are just so very good but they have a definite preference.  Their flavouring wants to stay in place when you play other sorts of music.  Throw on stuff that is made with a more V shaped sound in mind and they just ignore it.  Sure the bass it good, cleanly articulate but I could never make it dominate.  The vocals always stood up and sang their heart out.  Now I rather like that presentation so I’m not really seeing it as a problem but others will.  They are a vocal centric IEM and they will consistently put the vocals at the forefront of things.  They are when amped and at volume it has a tendency to peak towards the upper vocal ranges and with the wrong voices it errs towards getting shouty.    The highs though are really rather well behaved.  The detail level is excellent but they are really rather polite.  They offer a light shimmer to all but never sparkle with a bright hard edge.  Some may find it too polite and too reserved. 
 
In short they are superb, crazy detailed for the price but middy and creamy flavoured.  Detail junkie’s won’t likely love having to listen out for it rather than have it hurled at them.
 
Value:  As a backup IEM, hells yeah, middy luchiousness, so much space and grandeur.  But…. the dearth of isolation means they aren’t suitable for the sort of environments that IEM’s are normally wanted for.
 
Pro’s:  First rate sound quality.  Staging and scale are epic.  Sumptuous mids.
 
Con’s:  Negligible Isolation.  That upper vocal peak.
  • Like
Reactions: Light - Man
Pros: First rate sound quality. Staging and scale are epic.
Cons: Negligible Isolation. That lower treble peak. Its siblings exist.
DUNU TITAN 5 Quick Review
 
Thanks to DUNU for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/806906/dunu-titan-5-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  DUNU have triplets.
 
Price:  £95 or US$140
 
Specification:  Driver: 13 mm Titianium drivers, Frequency Response: 10 Hz- 40KHz, Sound pressure level: 108 +/- 2 dB, Impedance: 32 Ohm, Plug Size: 3.5 gold-plated plug, Cord length: 1.2m
 
Accessories:  1 X case, 1 X 3.5mm to 6.3mm audio adapter, 1 X shirt clip, 6 pairs of silicon tips
 
Build Quality:  Very nice.  The buds are CNC’ed metal, the cable is removable from the beds and thusly replaceable if you kill it.  The cable feels alright, very light and flexible and the jack is metal as usual.  It’s a rather nice package.
 
Isolation:  Well it’s a very open IEM, hence the isolation it offers is very slight.  If you want isolation then this isn’t for you.
 
Comfort/Fit:  For me great.  I mostly wore them up which worked fine by swapping right and left.  With that done I was happy to wear all day.  Worn down I found their shallow fit made them regularly tugging and being distracting.
 
Aesthetics:  They look pretty good I think.  Nothing amazing but still quite nice.
 
Sound:  Well the meat of thing, they sound pretty damn fantastic.  Seriously they are wow for an IEM, the air, the scale, the airiness, the detail levels are all crazy.  No question the TITAN 5 is amazingly good.  The problem is its slight V shape sound isn’t really the best suited to their abilities and thus I constantly think the 1 and 3 are what I’d go with.  It’s a shame really for the 5 as they are great.  The bass is a big full bodied affair, so clean and sculpted yet willing to rise up at a moment’s notice.  The treble is a little less well behaved.  When pushed its upper mid / lower treble range want to get a little bit excitable and “assertive.”  It will leap out and scream at you a little.  The mids, clean, open and highly detailed.  They really are a breathy wonder in their own right, they really are.  Trouble is I’d pick the 1 or the 3 over the 5 in pretty much every situation I can think of.  The range shows the driver which I’m sure they all share is freakishly good but the tuning here, these want to be proper audiophile IEM’s and the tuning I can’t see appealing to hard core audiophiles.  On the other side I can’t see it being as dramatically V shaped as might make it more popular with the masses.  It feels a little bit like its sitting in a room by itself, not quite one thing nor the other. 
 
So the Titan 5 is a great IEM, it’s just its siblings are every bit as capable but with preferable sound signatures.
 
Value:  Excellent.  The sound quality and capabilities for their price you get a bargain just like everything with DUNU stamped on it has been.
 
Pro’s:  First rate sound quality.  Staging and scale are epic.
 
Con’s:  Negligible Isolation.  That lower treble peak.  Its siblings exist.
  • Like
Reactions: jinxy245
Pros: Looks stunningly good. Stupidly cheap real monitors. Crazy levels of modularity.
Cons: Upper vocal tendency for stridency. Bass will be too polite for some.
MEE audio M6 Pro Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to MEE audio for the sample
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/806529/mee-audio-m6-pro-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  A bargain priced monitor
 
Price:  US$50 or £35
 
Specifications:  driver type moving coil (dynamic), driver size 10 mm, frequency response 20Hz to 20kHz, impedance 16 Ohms at 1K, sensitivity 100±3 dB (1mW at 1KHZ), maximum power input 30mW, Microphone Specifications directivity omnidirectional, frequency response 100 Hz to 10 kHz, sensitivity -42dB± 3dB, Product Details, ear coupling intraaural (in-ear), cable length 51 inches (1.3m), detachable, cable connector 3.5mm, right angle plug, weight 5.8oz (164g), water resistance rating IPX5.
 
Accessories:  Protective carrying case, eartips, shirt clips, spare cable, ¼" adapter
 
Build Quality:  Not just nice for the money but nice full stop.  Sure it’s all plastic but the cable with the transparent outer sheath with its bright silvered mesh weave underneath, it is one of the best looking IEM’s anywhere and at any price.  Its then all nicely put together and it’s all modular, the whole thing just exudes a quality level that is far in excess of its price.
 
Isolation:  Pretty good.  They may be dynamics but they are quite well sealed and thusly they isolate moderately well.  Absolutely fine for most typical uses, out and about, on a bus.  Tube and flights in a pinch but certainly not my first choice.  Obviously more than enough to get yourself run over if you aren’t paying attention.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Excellent.  They must be worn up which not everyone love but I do and they fit me perfectly.  They were perfectly comfortable to wear all day long too.  First rate on both accounts.
 
Aesthetics:  I love how these look.  They are for me one of the best looking earphones out there.  Not only are the buds fantastic looking but absolutely love that transparent sheath over that silvered mesh weave cable, stunningly good looking.
 
Sound:  Normal consumers may not have their expectations met.  I know I expected them to be very M6 like but other than visually they aren’t.  Acoustically they have nothing in common with each other.  The M6 Pro is a vastly more grown up, monitor like balanced IEM.  It really is an In Ear Monitor too.  The bass is competent and capable if a little boring.  The mids are very nice, a little prominent and forward compared with what many will be used to.  The treble is nicely refined, no edge, no brutality so some may find it not as in your face as they wish.  It’s not attention seeking at all, very plain and easy on the ear.  There is a bit of an upper vocal stridency but pair with something moderate, warm and don’t play silly buggers with the volume control and you’ll mostly be fine.  They really aren’t an exciting thrill ride.  They are grown up proper monitor like but for barely any money.
 
Not one for thrill seeking party people but if you’re a high school band, budding YouTube star, budding podcasting star, someone who wants an audio monitor but hasn’t tremendous wealth.
 
Value:  Just silly, the look fantastic, they come with two cables, detachable cables, you can buy replacement cables, replacement single buds and even a single sided cable if you only wantto use one side.  These should be pretty much at the top of the list for every budding audio based star starting out.  They then come with a craze lifetime, will replace for half price if you kill them offer. 
 
Pro’s:  Looks stunningly good.  Stupidly cheap real monitors.  Crazy levels of modularity.
 
Con’s:  Upper vocal tendency for stridency.  Bass will be too polite for some.
Pros: Thing is cray cray tiny. Great battery life. Real hardware buttons!!!
Cons: Id rather swap a smaller screen for bigger buttons.
FiiO M3 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to FiiO for the sample.
 
Full review here  http://www.head-fi.org/t/805984/fiio-m3-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Itty bitty DAP.
 
Price:  US$55 or £50
 
Specifications:  You name it, they list it.  See here for full details.  http://fiio.net/en/products/47/parameters
 
Accessories:  A micro USB cable, a pair of earbuds and a neck length lanyard.
 
Build Quality:  It would all seem to be pretty reasonably constructed.  It’s all very light though which some people think means lacking, the thing weighs almost nothing which I see as a boon myself.
 
Aesthetics:  I have the black one and its looks alright.  However there is a part of me that’s kicking myself for not having asked for the blue one.  I know I know, the grass is always greener but that blue looks so different.  Anyway, the black, yeah its looks fine nothing wildly eye-catching though.
 
Power:  While harder to drive things I felt it was struggling in the lower end but in terms of volume, my god it can scream when it wants too.  The dial goes to 60 but I couldn’t push it beyond 40 before it was uncomfortably loud.  So if you want to blast stuff out of maybe you have a hearing problem this can go stupidly loud.
 
Sound:  The little M3 is a tiny little thing and its super cheap so I didn’t have the highest of expectations.  Acoustically it is very pleasantly warmed, smoothed and with a little dash of cream.  It’s a very pleasant rendition and it worked extremely well when paired with the Sony EX500’s.  Both sharing that Far East / Sony sound.  Big, warm, slightly diffuse bottom, somewhat creamy mids and a mostly muted, dampened treble except for a little peak in there to keep things on track.  It’s been a highly popular sound signature for years so I’d expect it to be popular with likely buyers too.  It’s a gently warming, adding a dash of chocolatey brownness to things.  For me it turns more fast paced, powerful tracks into ones a little too heavy and too impactful.  The initial impact is calmed but there is such a weight behind it.   Never the less its one I know the masses like.
 
Overall the tiny little thing does a really rather capable job of everything you ask of it acoustically.  It’s a little bit flavoured but oh noes, it’s got a bit boosted bass, that enhances its expansion and weighty follow through.  Its target user isn’t exactly going to see that as an issue, they are much more likely to see it as a great big plus!
 
Value:  Has FiiO ever made anything that wasn’t great value?  FiiO are arguably the kings of high value DAP’s and the little M3 slotting in at the bottom end of their range does nothing to change that perception.  Its great value for its US$55 price tag.
 
Pros:  Thing is cray cray tiny.  Great battery life.  Real hardware buttons!!!
 
Con’s:  Id rather swap a smaller screen for bigger buttons.
Pros: Stupidly cheap. Stupidly good sounding. Badonkadonk bass.
Cons: Look cheap and plasticy. Feel cheap and plasticy.
Superlux HD681EVO Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to GearBest for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/805775/superlux-hd681evo-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  They may look cheap but they sound anything but.
 
Price:  US$32 or £23
 
Specification:  Headset type: Dynamic, Connectivity: Wired, Connecting interface : 3.5mm, Application: Mobile phone, Computer, Sport, Portable Media Player, Aviation, DJ, Cable Length (m): 1m, Driver unit: 50mm, Frequency response: 10Hz-30KHz, Impedance: 32ohms, SNR: 98dB, Input Power: 300mW ( max )
 
Accessories:  Package Contents: 1 x Headset, 1 x 1m Cable, 1 x 3m Cable, 1 x Adapter, 1 x Buckle, 1 x Storage Pouch (buckle?  Erm that’s what the website says yet no mention of the other ear pads.)
 
Build Quality:   Well…… it seems sturdy enough but it’s all glossy plastic and the headband rest thing is very plasticy too.  So while it doesn’t feel like it’s going to break or anything it’s all plastic and not the best to the touch plastic either.
 
Isolation:  While they are partially closed, they are still open.  They isolate hardly any at all so if you need iso, skip these.  Definitely not one I’d want for outdoor use unless you want everyone near you to be audible and for them to want to hit you.
 
Comfort/Fit:  They are not bad, the pads do rest on the ear so it can get a little stifling after a few hours but….. they are pretty much fine.  I was reasonably happy to wear them for hours at a time.
 
Aesthetics:  From a distance, they look rather AKG like don’t they?  Well get up close and that illusion disappears.  These are considerably cheaper looking, they look cheap and plasticy.  Not that they are ugly per say, but I wouldn’t think you’ll get mugged for them anytime soon.
 
Sound:  Have I been a little so so about them so far?  Yeah because these aren’t lookers and they don’t isolate for toffee but the sound?  Bugger me they sound insane for the price.  That they can post the things from the other side of the planet and sound like this for £23, just how????????  They sound fantastic, utterly fantastic, just simply incredible in the literal sense that they defy credibility.  So long as you ignore their labelling as “monitors” they aren’t, they aren’t anywhere near monitor like.  The bass in particular is great big badonkadonk bass.  Right up front, in your face, bouncing and jiggling all over the shop.  It’s awesome, a little bit silly perhaps but just nuts.  Big, jiggly, bouncing all over, so in your face and vigorous.  Just so much energy and playfulness that with its open nature means it’s much more articulated and clean than something closed would be.  The mids too, are just so open, dynamic, airy, yet a touch creamy, just excellent for the money.  The treble isn’t quite so accomplished, it’s a bit reduced in volume (which is wise) and there is a bit of a lower treble range spike that at volume gets a little ear tiring.  Still the detail and the shimmer they give is outstanding for the price.  If these cost more I could tear into to the treble a little because it’s not perfect but that price tag……. That price tag means I just can’t.  Sure they aren’t perfect but come on, £23 delivered, you’re practically stealing them at that price.
 
Value:  Shut up and buy a pair!!!
 
Pro’s:  Stupidly cheap.  Stupidly good sounding.  Badonkadonk bass.
 
Con’s:  Look cheap and plasticy.  Feel cheap and plasticy. 
Pros: Sound quality. They sound glorious. Sound quality.
Cons: Erm, I couldn’t find an UK retailers selling it. Cable is a bit short for my liking.
MEEaudio X7 Plus Quick Review
 
Thanks to MEEaudio for the sample
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/805135/meeaudio-x7-plus-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief: Uhura’s audiophile earphones.
 
Price:  US$100 which is about £70 before HMRC and Parcel Farce get involved.
 
Specifications:  driver size 6 mm, frequency response 20 Hz to 20 kHz, impedance 16 Ohms at 1K, sensitivity 100±3 dB (1mW at 1KHZ), battery type 2x built-in rechargeable Li-Poly battery, music playback time 7.5 hours, talk time 8 hours, standby time 300 hours, charging time 2 hours, charging connector micro-USB, Bluetooth version 4.1, Bluetooth profiles supported A2DP, HSP, HFP, AVRCP, audio codecs supported SBC, aptX®, AAC, operating range 30 ft (10 m), Microphone Specifications, directivity omnidirectional, frequency response 100 Hz to 8 kHz, Product Details, ear coupling, intraaural (in-ear), cable length 12 inches (31 cm), detachable, weight 0.5oz (14g), water resistance technology Liquipel Watersafe™ nano-coating
 
Accessories:  Micro-USB charging cable, 3 sets of ear tips, Carrying case, User manual
 
Build Quality:  They all looked and felt fine.  All a bit plastic but its plastic.  Interestingly it has “Liquipel” to make it water / sweat resistant.   I wasn’t going to run them under a tap to find out but they ought to be safe no matter how sweaty you get at the gym.
 
Isolation:  Despite being a dynamic it’s sealed and thusly it isolates rather well.  I’d be happy to use out and about or on a bus, even for the Tube or a flight in a pinch.  Obviously that correspondingly means you won’t hear wheeled death chariots if you fail to use your eyes when near traffic.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Aside from the very short cable, which meant it was a little snig if I wanted to wear under my chin, they were great.  Absolutely not a jot of an issue with them in my ears, happy to wear all day.
 
Aesthetics:  They, well they look fine.  I’d be lying if I said they were lookers but they look perfectly benign.  So what you’re not buying them to look at them are you.
 
Sound:  Excellent.  Easily by a damn good margin they are the best Bluetooth earphone I’ve played with.  They may only have a little 6mm driver but the bass is glorious, the mids are great and the treble is sumptuously refined.  Their balance may not be perfect for more mainstream listeners but these are aiming for a more serious, more discerning, more audiophile listener.  With a gently sloping back slash sound signature, the bass while elevated and forceful it may not be as over blown as something’s.  Sadly too many people think more bass is the defining attribute of “better.”  These are big yes but not silly big.  The mids are a bit behind but retain ample clarity and quality.  They shine not as brightly as I might want but nevertheless they shine beautifully.  Then the treble, there is a little spike in the lower ranges but overall they are excellent.  So much refinement and a faintly gentle rounding, softening of any brutality, I’m so impressed.  Now some may want a more hard edged, brutalistic treble but I am loving them.  I honestly really cannot in any way find any aspect or attribute of the X7 PLUS that is deficient.  These are not just “good for a Bluetooth earphone” but plain and simply good  Scratch that, not just good but fantastic. 
 
Kudos to the designers at MEEaudio, bravo good sirs, bravo.
 
Value:  Squeee!!!   Shut up and buy a pair.
 
Pro’s:  Sound quality.  They sound glorious.  Sound quality.
 
Con’s:  Erm, I couldn’t find an UK retailers selling it.  Cable is a bit short for my liking.
  • Like
Reactions: BrandonM
Pros: Bluetooth. Cheap. Personal trainer like encouragement.
Cons: Battery life is a handful of hours. Acoustically a little too much for me.
[size=12pt]Brainwavz BLU-200 Quick Review by mark2410[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Thanks to Brainwavz for the sample.[/size]
 
[size=12pt]Full review here  http://www.head-fi.org/t/804729/brainwavz-blu-200-review-by-mark2410[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Brief:  Uhura’s earphones 2.0.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Price:  US$54.50 or £39.50[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Specifications:  Transducers/Drivers: Dynamic, 9.2mm, Rated Impedance: 16ohms Closed Dynamic, Sensitivity: 96dB at 1mW, Frequency range: 20 ~ 20000Hz, Bluetooth 4.0 (CSRBC8645) with aptX, Operation max distance: 30ft (10m), Battery: 60mAh - 4hrs playtime, 100hrs standby, 2hrs for full charge (Micro USB charging), CVC echo and noise cancellation, Supports voice prompt for MMI: Power on / Paring / Connecting / Battery low / Power off, Supports HFP, HSP and A2DP, Supports pairing with two devices at the same time, 3 button remote, works with Apple iOS products, Android & Windows phones & PC[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Accessories:  Earphone Hardcase, 3 sets of Silicone Ear Tips (S M L), 1 set of Comply™ Foam Tips S-400, 1 pair of Ear Hooks, 1 Micro USB Charging Cable, Velcro Cable Tie, Instruction Manual, Warranty Card (24 month warranty)[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Build Quality:  Nice, they feel comfortably put together and while some may find them “plasticky” to which I say, duh!  Actually I’m pretty sure the enclosures are aluminium painted black but still, they are very light.  You want something wireless to be nicely light[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Isolation:  Not bad, they a are a step up on the 100’s and so I think these you could pretty much get away with anywhere.  Out and about or bus traveling.  Though Tube or flights you’d be pushing it but could do in a pinch.  For most people they would do a grand job of blocking out random gym noise.  As ever though, do remember that you must use your eyes and not ears to check for traffic or get yourself a donor card.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Comfort/Fit:  They are rather sizable but they were very light, plus I wore them over my ears and so were easily fine for wearing till the battery died.  More secure than you’d think too so I’d be fine bouncing about or jogging with.  There was a tiny bit of driver flex but nothing that was issue causing.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Aesthetics:  They look just like the 100 and well, they are fine.  Nothing special, eye catching but then they didn’t visually bother me either.  Meh, they look fine and looks don’t really matter anyway.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Sound:  They take the sound of the 100 and butch it up.  They may not be entirely my cup of tea but are a rhythmic thumper to get you through that last 10 minutes on the treadmill.  Big beefy bottom, not the world’s most taught but it wants to thump, big humpy thumpy oomf.  You know, subtle like a smack in the face and while my own sensibilities may want a little more sonic purity, it’s not for audiophile listening.  It’s for activity inducing vigour and there it shines.   Big raucous bass dragging you along for the ride.  The mids, well a little so so.  I love mids and these are moderately passable but again they aren’t for Nora, they are for “Now That’s What I Call Running.”  The highs are I think tuned with the likes of “Now That’s What I Call Running” content in mind.  It’s a bit of a light glazing to things, enough to let you know where things ought to be and fill in the spaces.  Though it’s never going to dominate it never has the hard, edged brutality that can so often appear in that musical style, with its mastering levels and the bit rates that it often appears at.  They are built and tuned with bouncy rhythmic, drag you round that last stretch, music.  It’s a great pairing if that’s what you want them for.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Value:  As ever, it’s a Brainwavz and they always offer great value for money.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Pro’s:  Bluetooth.  Cheap.  Personal trainer like encouragement.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Con’s:  Battery life is a handful of hours.  Acoustically a little too much for me.[/size]

  • Like
Reactions: BrandonM
voxie
voxie
Thanks for sharing Mark. Honest and to the point as ever
Pros: Diminutive. Crowd pleasing lower end output. Connectivelya versatile. “Jack of all trades.”
Cons: Low end lacks discipline. Wallet ouchy. “Master of none.”
[size=12pt]Ruark Audio R4 Mk3 Quick Review[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Thanks to Ruark for the loaner.[/size]
 
[size=12pt]Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/804721/ruark-audio-r4-mk3-review-by-mark2410[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Brief:  Ruark’s box of wonders.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Price:  £650 which is circa US$915[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Specifications:  • 2 x 3.5 in custom high-fidelity drivers, • 4.0 in sub woofer, • Tuned bass reflex cabinet, • 80w nominal power output, • Enhanced 3D sound processor, • DAB*, DAB+* and FM tuner with RDS, • Removable DAB/FM aerial with F-Type connector, • Security slot, • OLED display, • Full function remote control, • MP3, WMA, AAC - see www.ruarkaudio.com/support, for further details on supported formats, Inputs and outputs, • A2DP, aptX Bluetooth, • Front Aux audio input - 3.5mm stereo jack, • Rear Aux audio input - stereo RCA/phono, • Line out audio output - line level stereo RCA/phono, • 3.5mm headphone output, • USB 2.0 playback, 5W (5V 1A) output, • Input power 100-240VAC, 50-60Hz 1.5A max, • Dimensions: 440x250x125mm (17.3x9.8x4.9 ins), • Weight: 6.7kg (14.8 lbs)[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Accessories:  Err, the remote control.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Build Quality:  Most pleasing.  It’s a nice object to the touch, its solid, firmly constructed and it looks rather nice too.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Aesthetics:  I’m not wowed with the white one but it’s still pleasant, the walnut one though does look rather lovely in pics.  I’m sure most will agree it’s a pleasing to look at device.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Sound:   Errrrr, erm, well lest just start by saying that the R4 Mk3 is a convergence device.  A compromise device, it’s not all about audio quality above all else and thusly you only get a capable audio output.  It’s restrained by the lack of stereo separation, a real tweeter and what they call a “sub woofer.”  Yeah, that “sub” has a 4 inch driver inside a teeny tiny enclosure so while it may spit forth a tremendous output for its diminutive proportions lets not think for a second that it’s a real sub.  For sure it’ll spank the living daylights out of whatever your silly flat panel TV can do.  Side by side, the R4 and any flat TV, they aren’t on the same planet in terms of abilities but it’s not going to be challenging a real Home theatre set up.  However, you know what, it’s not trying to be that.  The R4 is a little bit of everything.  To my eyes it’s just perfect to sit below the TV in some boutique hotel room.  Optical in the back from the TV and you’ll get a pretty convincing movie watching experience.  Same for a bedroom, minimalist living room or of an indulgently extravagant guest bedroom.  Not only can produce a pleasing clarity and depth to films it’ll happily play back music too.  Something discrete for a quiet dinner party yet can crank up the volume after opening bottle of wine number 5.  Sure next to dedicated home theatre or grown up Hi-Fi its compromises can be glaring but simply put, the R4 MK3 is a nice, little bit of everything, in a nice little package.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Value:  Its expensive yes but it’s a nice little bundle.  Sure you could get something better at any particular aspect for the money but the point of the R4 is that it’s a little bit of everything.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Pro’s:  Diminutive.  Crowd pleasing lower end output.  Connectively versatile. “Jack of all trades.”[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Con’s:  Low end lacks discipline.  Wallet ouchy.  “Master of none.”[/size]
Jackson 6
Jackson 6
I find it the best radio/cd unit out there, and used in this way, it's superb. Bedside bliss.
Pros: Superbly good value for money. Superb spec for money. Price tag.
Cons: Aside from value, it just doesn’t excel at anything. Unexciting.
[size=12pt]Honor 5X Quick Review[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Thanks to[/size] [size=12pt]Honor[/size] [size=12pt]for the loaner.[/size]
 
[size=12pt]Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/804272/honor-5x-review-by-mark2410[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Brief:  An Honourable mid-ranger.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Price:  £190 or US$200.  Three UK contracts start at £13 a month. (N.B. there is presently an extra £20 off available.)[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Specifications:  System: Android 5.1 + EMUI 3.1, Memory: Internal: 16 GB / RAM: 2 GB / Slot type: microSD / Max. slot capacity: 128 GB, Display: 5.5" / Full HD IPS / Resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels,     Camera: 13 Mpixels / Front: 5 Mpixels, Network: 4G: LTE 800/900/1800/2100/2600 MHz / 3G: 900/1900/2100 MHz / GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, Dual SIM Card (Nano & Micro-SIM),     Wireless: Bluetooth: 4.1 / Wifi: 802.11 b/g/n, Connection: Jack 3.5 mm / Micro-USB / Micro SD,     GPS: GPS/AGPS + GLONASS, Sensors: Accelerometer, Ambient Light Sensor, Digital Compass, Fingerprint sensor, Hall sensor, Proximity sensor, Battery: 3000 mAh, Dimensions: 151.3 x 76.3 x 8.15 mm, SAR Head: 0.56 W/kg, SAR Body: 0.24 W/kg[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Accessories:  Charging plug and a micro USB charging cable.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Build Quality:  The construction seems nicely done, however the “metal” back felt cheap, like it was thin plastic painted with metallic paint.  Nothing “bad” and for the money even complaining about the back feels like I’m being petty.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Aesthetics:  Having the gold one may not have helped but I felt the phone takes a better photo than it looks in real life.  Not that it’s bad or ugly but it felt like its overreaching, trying to be an all metal super premium object. However it felt a little bit Ratner’s or Elizabeth Duke.  I would have preferred it was a more honest soft touch plastic.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]As a Phone:  Everything worked just as you would expect a phone to.  Calls were good, text and data were fine too.  The CPU was good and while it may not have benchmarked amazingly well it always felt responsive and snappy.  Similarly the GPU, didn’t benchmark great but my go to testing game, Asphalt 8 ran perfectly smoothly however 3Dmark only gave it 177 compared to the ancient Nexus 5 getting 911.  I’m no gamer but it seemed fine to me.  Actually, good is the perfect word for the 5x as everything it did was good.  Nothing amazing, nothing bad.  The camera too was pretty reasonable.  Every aspect was in the good to rather good range, it could do everything and do it well, more than adequately sufficient.  No NFC nor 5GHz WiFi but those were the only things I missed. It’s just simply put a nice device, it does everything and it’s really nicely priced.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Sound:  The speaker, well, meh its fine.  It would cope with the odd Netflix playback in a pinch but not the loudest ever.  The HP out though, well while I had very high hopes for the chipset given how well I liked the Snapdragon 400’s, this I felt was……. just like everything else about the phone.  It was good, perfectly and adequately sufficient.  It was all reasonably even-handed in its presentation and rendition.  It’s all just so very reasonable.  I never found anything that was bad but I never really found anything that would just sing, no earphone pairing nor any musical pairing either.  It was all just fine, perfectly reasonable to listen to but never really captured the spirit of anything.  All so much flavourless and uneventful.  Of course there was nothing I could really complain about given its price and its other attributes but while my head knows that, my heart was rather indifferent to it all.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Value:  Well there is no mistaking that you get a ton of device for the money.  Normally £190 but £170 just now or US$200 in the US.  You just can’t really argue with that sort of value.  It may fall short of super high priced flagship devices in probably every category but…… its one third of their price, if that.  Yet it manages to stay in the realm of competitive in it abilities to them.  So like we’ve see with previous Honor devices, you get a big old heap of phone for a pretty itty bitty price.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Pro’s:  Superbly good value for money.  Superb spec for money.  Price tag.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Con’s:  Aside from value, it just doesn’t excel at anything.  Unexciting.[/size]
Pros: Super dainty complete package. Party time enthusiasm.
Cons: Sadly USB audio out on android is hit or miss. Treble is light for some.
[size=12pt]Zorloo Aero Quick Review[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Thanks to[/size] [size=12pt]Zorloo[/size] [size=12pt]for the sample.[/size]
 
[size=12pt]Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/801984/zorloo-aero-review-by-mark2410[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Brief:  Zorloo make exactly what I wanted them to.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Price:  Post Indiegogo I believe RRP will be US$120[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Specifications:  DAC/amp ESS SABRE 9018Q2C, Max Sampling 48kHz, Max Depth 24 bit, SNR 105dB, THD 0.003%, Driver Size 14.8mm, Cable Length 1.2m[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Accessories:  3 pairs of silicone tips, a pair of Comply’s and a little baggy case thing.  Which looks like a grey version of what I got, it’s a pretty sturdy, thick nylon baggy.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Build Quality:  It would appear to pretty good.  There isn’t really anything I can think of to complain about, though I still don’t love flat cables.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Isolation:  Very nice actually for a dynamic.  They don’t feel or sound open so accordingly they isolate very nicely.  More than sufficient for your normal out and about, on a bus type travels.  You’d get by with the odd flight or Tube commute too.  Naturally that means they are way easily enough to make you an organ donor if you forget to use your eyes when near traffic as you won’t otherwise hear it.  Eyes people![/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Comfort/Fit:  They fit me bang on great, though…….. the buds are big, really big and I did, when I first saw them, gulp.  They turned out to fit snugly in my ears with no issues whatsoever but I’m convinced that can’t hold true for everyone.  If you have little ears I’d be concerned.  However they fit me perfectly well and could thus wear them all day long, happily.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Aesthetics:  The buds aside from being huge, they are exposed metal and as I’ve said many a time, I love that.  I also love that the metal colour is dependent on the tuning / type.  I’m not totally sure why the apple vs android editions come in different colours as you can interchange the cables and hence the connector, so why can’t you get the light and dark grey ones with either connector type?[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Sound:   They are big, weighty powerful beasts and they a have a slant towards the low end.  It does make me wonder then how bass must the “Euphoric” ones be?  Anyway think big thumping bass.  It’s pretty rounded, its depth drops off and it declines on nearing the mid-range but it itself is a bit of a beast.  It loves to come out, rip roaring, thundering out a party bassline.  The audio snob in me frowns a bit as it’s kinda over blown but there’s no denying it’s a party animal.  The mids comparatively are rather behind the bass but the mid/bass blending region is nicely dipped so the vocals are largely unimpeded.  They are however still on the darker, warmer, more weighty side of things.  Delicate, light breathy vocals just isn’t its forte.  Soft and creamy vocals though do very nicely, a little over viscous perhaps but they just sound so pleased with themselves.  There is a joy to what they do, they feel like are wildly enjoying themselves.  So much joy and happiness.  The treble, it’s a little bit muted.  They don’t want to do cutting, crisp edges which is perfect for my ears.  It’s also perfect for the majority of mainstream music in that they are badly recorded, horribly mastered then often played back at crappy bitrates.  Oh and not forgetting being dynamically compressed to hell so they clip like a fleet of clipper ships.  The Aero does its best to gently cover up those acoustic atrocities so they won’t be loved by everyone.  They won’t be replacing a pair of RE-0’s or ER4’s as their treble in comparison is very tame and it doesn’t offer up massive detail.  It’s about ensuring the listener has a good and enjoyable time, they are not acoustic magnifying glasses there to help you examine music in detail.  [/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Think party fun time.  Give ‘em a woo hoo and then go dance inappropriately round the room.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Value:  If you already have a fantastic source then at their RRP of US$120 you can do “better” but these aren’t for people who already have good stuff.  These are for people who, for whatever reason, need to use their phone.  They then get to ignore the potentially terrible DAC and amp in your phone and give you a consistently capable output no matter what’s driving them.   It’s a vastly more convenient package than having your phone and strapping a DAC and amp to the back of it.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Pro’s:  Super dainty complete package.  Party time enthusiasm.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Con’s:  Sadly USB audio out on android is hit or miss.  Treble is light for some.[/size]
Pros: Darkly gorgeous sound. Bass is epically and darkly glorious. Crisp shimmery treble.
Cons: Vocals a little soulless. Can’t do lightly open and airy.
[size=12pt]Fidue A65 Quick Review[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Thanks to[/size] [size=12pt]hifiheadphones[/size] [size=12pt]for the sample.[/size]
 
[size=12pt]Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/801198/fidue-a65-review-by-mark2410[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Brief:  Don’t mind if Fidue (sorry but I had to:)[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Price £50 or about US$70[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Specifications:  Driver Unit: 8mm dynamic Drive with Titanium Composites, Frequency response: 16Hz - 22000 Hz, Rated impedance: 16Ω, Sensitivity: 101db, Distortion: <1%, Max Input Power: 30mW, Plug: 3.5mm mini stereo gold-plated plug, Cable: 1.3m, Sensitivity of Mic: -42+-3db, S/N Ratio of Mic:[/size] [size=12pt][/size][size=12pt]55db[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Accessories:  Silicone eartips (S/M/L), Double flange silicone eartips, High quality pouch and lastly a shirt clip.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Build Quality:  They would appear to be quite exemplary, my fingers and eyes both agree these are a quality object.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Isolation:  So so at best.  I mean if you are coming from using earbuds then you’ll likely be amazed but if you’re coming from a pair of Ety’s then you won’t be chuffed.  They are middling to the lower end of the level we see from most dynamics.  I mean music playing it’ll be fine to easily over shadow traffic noise but, on a bus I’d be weary of being that guy.  Still as ever with them playing it’s all more than sufficient to get yourself run over of you aren’t using your eyes.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Comfort/Fit:  Good.  I had no trouble at all but if you wear down they are a little weighty and can tug at the ear a little.  Wear them up and your fine.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Aesthetics:  I see copper and I think a bit blingy but the offset of the, err dark ish metal both being brushed and thusly not so highly reflective, I rather like.  They’re nice.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Sound:  They are bassy but it’s a dark bass, not warmed, not really what I’d call cold but just no added warmth.  A bit dark, soulless, detached something that I cannot quite find the words for.  There is something dark there but no usual accompaniment of the rich warmth that is almost always the case with elevated bass.  I like it, it helps keep the bass clean and detached.  It is a bit elevated and its elevation continues towards the lower mid ranges.  Male vocals tend to a touch boosted but again there isn’t the typical richness to the elevation.  It’s curious.  Girly vocals don’t stand out so much and can be a little dead inside.  There isn’t the creamy richness that its darkened presentation normally offers.  Gah, there is a darkened something, something a little detached going on here but I just can’t nail what.  In the highs they are mostly subdued.  They are not particularly apparent but hey are cleanly rendered.  Just faintly delicate, clean, but in the back and they never come close to dominant.  Even when pushed, they are really quite treble subdued.  My ears are bang on pleased with that.  It does have a beautiful metallic edged twang when cymbals are struck. [/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Value:  Yey!  They are lovely value but then there are so many things from the Far East that are.  These happen to very much suit my own tastes, gloriously scaled bass, crisply clean yet subdued treble, yeah im a bit of a fan. [/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Pro’s:  Darkly gorgeous sound.  Bass is epically and darkly glorious.  Crisp shimmery treble.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Con’s:  Vocals a little soulless. Can’t do lightly open and airy.[/size]

Pros: Look sublimely good. Stupid bass power. Look fantastically good.
Cons: They are rather unruly. That bass its skull crusing.
[size=12pt]MEEaudio M6 Quick Review[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Thanks to[/size] [size=12pt]MEEaudio[/size] [size=12pt]for the sample[/size]
 
[size=12pt]Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/800957/meeaudio-m6-review-by-mark2410[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Brief:  A fresh look at an oldie[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Price:  US$20 or £16[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Specifications:  Driver 9 mm ultra high performance drivers with neodymium magnets, frequency response 20 Hz to 20 kHz, impedance 16 Ohms at 1K, sensitivity           98 dB (1mW at 1KHZ), maximum power 30 mW, memory wire stainless steel, connector 3.5mm gold plated, right angle connector, cable color matched 130 cm (51 in) cord with attached shirt clip, water resistance rating IPX5[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Accessories:  6 pairs of silicon tips, a shirt clip and a case.  All of which are coloured according to which colour earphones you get.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Build Quality:  Very good, you never know to look or touch them as to how cheap they are.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Isolation: Very good for a dynamic.  Easily one of the very best isolating dynamics, practically at the lower end of what a BA IEM can do.  Easily fine for normal out and about or on a bus uses.  Even flight or the occasional Tube commute you’d be okay with.  Naturally easily enough to get yourself killed if you don’t keep your eyes open when you’re near traffic.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Comfort/Fit:  Excellent.  A little bit of driver flex but otherwise no issue in fitting them nor wearing them for hours.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Aesthetics:  They come in a heap of colours but it my opinion the clear ones look just stunning.  The clear buds with the silver woven, then transparent coated cable is pretty much the best looking cable ever.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Sound:  Bass.  Like the song says these are “All About The Bass.”  They are simply at their most happy when they are thundering out a gargantuan bass line.  My own musical tastes may be rather somewhat more sedate so for me , oh my it’s a bit a show stopper.  Its beastly, potently violent when push that volume dial.  Lol, it’s mental.  If you need yousinuse need blown out these’ll do it.  Owl City’s “Tidal Wave” while a fast paced, rhythmically lively pop extravaganza, the bass, oh my the bass.  Its skull punching, thankfull these aren’t the firmest in the base, they are a touch soft which is a factor of their cheapness but its highly welcome for me.  This level of quantity and its desire to leap all over the place with the slightest provocation would otherwise kill me.  They are marketed as gym earphones (IP5X sweat resistance rated) and if you need a bass line to haul yourself through a session, this is the sort of bass that’ll do it.  It’ll simply grab you by the collar and throw you through the nearest plate glass window.  It’s not trying to be same great acoustic masterpiece, it’s a beast, a beast with a clear purpose in life. [/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Value:  Silly cheap, look orgasmiclly good, and they either have a sound you will love or hate.  Super value.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Pro’s:  Look sublimely good.  Stupid bass power.  Look fantastically good.[/size]
[size=12pt] [/size]
[size=12pt]Con’s:  They are rather unruly.  That bass its skull crusing.[/size]
Back
Top