Reviews by lucanato

lucanato

100+ Head-Fier
The worst penon product
Pros: None
Cons: -Absolutely overvalued Dongle
-it completely change the sound of your headphone making them sound without basses and absolutely trebles oriented
- definition here is hyper definition and every detail will make your ears blooding in 1 minute
- details are harsh too
- unnatural dynamics and prat
- with sensitive iems you won't be able to listen at low volume cause the digital noise will interrupt very low sound
- you can only regulate volume form cell... Bleah
- One time i connect it to a pc and push play before check pc volume and I almost went deaf
-penon complete stole me this money only thanks to the trust gained through his earphones for a product that should cost 20 euros for such a low tech object.
-I can't understand why none of those golden ears writing and reviewing here have ever yet reported this flop.
-funny: there is also some light coming from inside but you can see it only from the unused plug.
-tried with a lot of iems,cheap, expensive, same disappointing results.
-no more blind shopping tempted by your early bird/vip discounts since that unfortunate date I bought Penon tail... Good job Penon!
I express everything in my cons: Penon tail is a donation to PENON, than you can throw it in the garbage and take something else.

List of owned dongle not in order:
Qwestyle M12
Ibasso dc03pro
Ibasso dc04pro
Fiio btr 7
Qudelix 5k
Moondrop dawn

Penon iems bought from Penon:
Vortex
Isn h50
2x Fan2
Serial

Cable from Penon:
Space
Last edited:

lucanato

100+ Head-Fier
wonderfully tuned
Pros: cohesive sound
musical
geat sub bass
lovely frequency curve similar to serial
incredible render of echoes that go very far in the deep dark!
cheap price (i payed almost 30euro and they are way better than chu and kz pr2)
scale very well with better amps (for example ifi gryhon in balnced mode....uau)
very layered sound for example with orchestra are wonderful and engaging and real
good separation and wide stage with better amps and better cables
pleasant dynamics neither too much nor too little
comunicative and realistic voice timbre
organic and natural
good confort with the right tips
Cons: bad cable
isolation is not the best but the comfort is good as they not seal completely
nozzle have sharp edges, and they cut me several tips until I filed them down...
a little heavy they are made of metal
At first I heard some resonance in the treble, now I don't hear them anymore maybe the burn in has had an effect or maybe the changing of cable
not much to say, buy them, i had vortex, serial, chu i, chu ii, kz pr2 that i'm sending back, he1000se. Piccolo are schockingly good for the price!
Last edited:

lucanato

100+ Head-Fier
Holographic Isn h50
Pros: Among 300$ iems I've tried are the most holographic and wide staging!
Sub bass, medium, and highs very fast
Great separation
Great texturing
Great dynamics
Very informative and detailed coming from fan2 and vortex
I can agree it could cost double the price
No needs for est tweeter you'll ear everything (but to be honest I didn't try est yet😊)
Great rendering of percussive and string, and brass instruments.
If an instrument is made of metal you can ear it ( it is not so with fan2).
No ba plastic timbre.
Musical (intended as conveying emotions and microdynamics not as warm\colored bass and medium bass)
Great fit (not long nozzle as fan2)
Suitable for playing classical music ( fan2 isn't).
Well recorded orchestra is so expansive.
Sold by the best seller I've found : Penon Audio
Cons: The most important cons for me is: too unnatural energy in the medium and highs.

Sub bass fast but shy unless you rise the volume ( and I'm not bass head), vortex have more bass and medium bass in a-b test!
So medium and highs are predominant,and pushed to your attention.
Medium bass a little confused like intubated and recessed so that you have the impression to listen to two medium highs frequency speakers with a subwoofer that not perfectly melted to the rest.
For that reason coherence going from sub bass to mids is not so good ( although the graph the I have seen on head-fi didn't show this) champions in this region were fan2.
So the result is a slightly thin sound with sub bass added.
For me are exciting but fatiguing, they will offer a sort of augmented reality with exaggerated speed and dynamics that gives also aggressive vocal rendition.
Not tried with dongle ( sold immediately before they arrived) I suggest warm, thick and slow amps.
Not the best look and tactile and visual experience ( sort of opaqueness in the resin) Vs penon IEMs for example that shine like diamond.
Mmcx if you have a set of 0.78mm cables.
Hi this is my first review.
I'm an italian classical pianist and I worked also in a big band jazz orchestra in the past. I'm in to hifi from 1988, I listen in my home setup with directed heated 2 watt valve ampli and another el84 push-pull class a, and many high efficiency wide range speakers with a passive output transformer based modified DAC, I have also a Lenco 75s for vynil.

I've started playing with inear headphones during the last year (I was missing the Walkman epoque with my Aiwa walkman with superpermalloy head and aiwa earphones with amorphous diamond I owned when I was sixteen..) and I tried many IEMs always under 300$ since now.
Tried: Moondrop chu, Hzsound heart mirror og, Blon bl-05, Moondrop Kato, Tinhifi t2plus p1max panda, Etymotic mk-5, Ikko oh10, Tri i3pro, Imr ozar, Penon Fan2, and Vortex.
I kept only Chu, Vortex and Fan2, but recently I sold Fan2 for fitting problems.
I own also an overear Beyerdinamic t70p and Philips Fidelio x2hr.

I listen to all genres of music but I use classical music as reference to decide if a iem sounds natural and musical or not, the other genres are subordinated cause they are not useful to test the sound.
I can't own too much iems just to make a collection, if something doesn't play well everything, I sell it.
So I buy and sell very quickly sometimes.

I can recognize in few seconds if something is natural or simply fan sounding but not natural (as fan2), actually the most natural iem is Penon Vortex.

I told almost everything in the pro and cons about h50. The 100 hours of burn in completely change the out of the box sound.
I have to say that I didn't try h50 with any recent amp or dongle (only a little with my old Fiio Kunlun) cause I've sold ibasso dc03pro and questyle M12 and waiting for dc04pro and Cayin ru6 but my Motorola phone sound pretty good.
I rolled different tips and cables to see if I could overcome to the cons I have had with h50 but I couldn't.

I was excited by h50 at first with all these informations and holographic sound that make magically appears in the space all these objects (wow with pink Floyd) but the emphasis is more than anything else on the attack of all the sounds, not to the body not to the decay, so after few listening this was a "drugged" and flashy sound far from the effortless that natural instruments have in reality.

It's a pity that this fast sub bass was not preceded by a rich medium bass. Medium bass is so... cheap.. low quality not clear intubated as when you try to sing In a long corridor and you hear reflection of the walls, what a shame. Maybe some of you didn't heard this but already happened that I experienced some confused mid bass on Ian S2 cable and no one agreed with me so, who will be right? I don't know.

Piano solos are missing the warm and the fullness of the medium bass sound resulting a little thin with the add of sub bass.

Cello and violins were so well textured and you can feel the bow rubbing the strings but it was too intense too exaggerated and after few second you feel tired.

Yes maybe you can live with this if you are seeking for strong emotion and sensation and you don't seek for naturalness at every cost. But not me.

Returning to vortex you feel the information and stage decrease a lot but all is so natural and I can recognize the sound, the timbres I listen in live session and it's so cohesive sound, violins are so juicy and rightly energetic that I ask always to me, why are you seeking for something else?

Fan2 were also so beloved: a lot of coherence between all the drivers you can't distinguish when were ending DD and starting ba. The bass was so fast but creamy, elastic very fun, but h50 have more sub bass.I prefer a lot more the fan2 on bass and medium basses as the sub bass for me don't have to be too much pronounced. But fan2 were so strange in timbre and you can't obtained a real piano experience and I'm general they could not convey the material from which the instrument was made.You can't listen for metal and plucked instruments they result too much smoothed and mellow sounding. Electronic music with fan2 was hypnotic and also metal music. And it is also but in a different way with h50. But with metal you miss the bass energy and fullness of fan2 and distorted guitars become harsh.

So this is my attempt with h50 but it was very short!
Last edited:
vandung2510
vandung2510
I enjoy reading this 😁 Never hurt to have another review, especially from someone who has musical experience. Also, it wouldn't hurt to have a few pictures in too 😂
lucanato
lucanato
I thought it wasn't necessary as there are a lot of photo in the previous reviews... That I read a lot of time before buying them, but thanks for advice!
Back
Top