Reviews by 200poundsofamp

200poundsofamp

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Easy to drive, stylish for full sized heaphones, nice combo of flavor and accuracy
Cons: Sucked out lower midrange
Simply put? The lower midrange just isn't there.
 
Everything else, though, is pretty damned nice. Vocals? Clear as hell. Bass? Plenty of impact, and it gets LOW*
 
With that out of the way though, the lower midrange has problems. If I was feeling mean I'd some up with something witty, but **** you.
 
You like powerful vocals, orchestras, or metal? You better start running and screaming. Like R&B? Stick around, these will do you well.
 
*modded with m50 earpads, at least. Without them the midrange changes for the better, but they're otherwise unremarkable, and quite a bit less comfortable.
 
 
 
tdockweiler
tdockweiler
Weird, the lower mids on mine are as about as forward as the HD-650 and Q701. The only dips to me might be in the lower treble. Graphs seem to show them having recessed upper mids, but I think they're forward. The mids are also never thin and very full sounding. Eddie Vedder's vocals actually sound better on the DJ100 compared to the HD-650.
With the ODAC+Magni and M50 pads they're perfect for anything with a large soundstage in the recording. Strangely the soundstage size is increased more by the ODAC than an amp. With say the Buena Vista Social Club and this setup, it feels like I have an open headphone on my head.
I would say these are my favorites for female/male vocals. Both equally good IMO. I would say it does push female vocals a little more forward.
BTW have you tried them with the O2 or Magni yet?
200poundsofamp
200poundsofamp
Sorry tdock but I was drunk posting, I'll put some more worthwhile words up there eventually.
I mainly use these with my Bithead and haven't tried any crazy amp paring. But to my ears there's a definite suckout somewhere <1000hz that makes instruments lack body (trumpets especially bug me) and pushes male singers to the back of the mix sometimes.
I don't think it's a BAD flavor but it makes me reach for my HD580s and T50rps most of the time at home. DJ100s make female singers sound brilliant, but the other two just sound a lot more natural to me.
Definitely agree with you about the boosted upper midrange though, screw the measurements. To me that's one of the defining characteristics of these things.
eimis
eimis
Once I was doing my homework while drunk. T'was fun...

200poundsofamp

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Aggressive sound, great midrange detail, deep and controlled bass
Cons: Zingy treble, exaggerated sibilance, lengthy burn in time
Overall sound: Forward with aggressive treble, neutral to slightly cold midrange tonality and a sub bass boost.

Bass: The 680's have specifically emphasized sub bass, unlike the SRH840 and ATH-M50 which emphasize both midbass and sub bass. This is good and bad in a few ways - for one it doesn't flavor the midrange and allows the driver to respond faster since it doesn't have as much bass to choke over, but it's a less natural sound, and it loses a bit of texture.

Overall though I really like it, as it has nice sub bass performance for hip hip and electronic but stays out of the way for rock, metal and jazz, where bass just gets in the way. It does make drums a little thunderous, and if you have a really fast double kick drum it can linger too much, but overall I think it's more controlled than either the SRH840 and M50.

Quantity is about on par with the 840, with the 840 having much more midbass and the 680 having more sub bass. The extension on the HFI-680 is superior though, and overall it's great sounding bass.

Midrange: Unlike the 840 and M50 it isn't colored by midbass, giving these a slightly cold and sharp sound. Overall detail and texture is a step above as well, and it really gives guitars, strings and brass the sharp edge they need. However the midrange isn't quite as smooth or controlled as the SRH840, and while the sibilance here isn't painful it's definitely overpronounced a little. The midrange overall leaves me a little flat though - I'd like the midrange to have more presence, and vocals can come out a little cold.

Treble: The weak point on these things. Extension is actually very nice and a step above the 840, but it has a sizzle to it and isn't quite as natural sounding or controlled. It also suffered from a somewhat ragged attack that creeps into the upper midrange at times, and is most apparent on things like snare drum hits and cymbal crashes.

The boosted treble does give it a sense of aggression and energy that I really like though, and it's not as harsh as a Grado SR80i. But if you're looking for maximum fidelity there are better choices.

Soundstage: This was what I was most interested to hear when I first bought these things, and while it's certainly not amazing or holographic it is a nice effect. Seems like you're listening in widescreen nearly, as it presents you with a not very tall but very wide and unbroken wall of sound in front of your head. This gives a very good arena feel, and is more like the presentation of floor speakers, but on the downside there's little depth too it and it makes it harder to pick out individual sounds. For a closed can it's very spacious sounding though, and there's no closed can reverb.

Comfort and isolation: These are lighter, roomier, stay cooler and have a better headband than the SRH840. The pads aren't nearly as plush or wide though.

Design: Barebones, but sturdy. The headband fits fairly flush to your head and shiny metal accents are pretty cool, although they look like they scratch very easily.

Overall: At the $135 price point these are worth the price, although their sound quality lags behind the SRH840, which is only slightly more expensive.

If you're looking for a fun and aggressive sound with a small bass boost and a detailed and sharp sounding midrange in a closed can this is a nice buy.

Some half assed photography:
hfi680.jpg
 
edit: I've gotten rid of these, they've been replaced by a SR80i. These weren't quite the closed Grados I was looking for, and for a more neutral sound I prefer the SRH840s. Also bumped the audio quality down a little - to me these are fine but nothing that special.
  • Like
Reactions: nick n
200poundsofamp
200poundsofamp
Since there's not much info an these, here's a comparison to the rest of the HFI series:

Originally Posted by HeatFan12

This is true. Each Ultrasone has its own unique sound. Some may be better, given certain model #s, some are personal preference.

I own the HFI-580, 680 and 780 (2 pairs). The 580s have more bass than the 680s but less than the 780s and are not as detailed as the 680s or 780s. Still a fun can. The most balanced sound among the three is the 680.
I also own the HFI-700 and it too is balanced in the spectrum, with more bass than the 680 but less than the 780.

IMO, all Ultrasones have bass, that is not their weakness. The 780s also have very piercing highs that make your eyes water, out of the box, along with great deeeeeep bass. The highs and lows seemed detached from each other while still being prominent. Burn-in and a re-cable took care of that.
  • Like
Reactions: nick n

200poundsofamp

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Clarity, detail, tonality, driver speed
Cons: Slightly thin presentation, stupid AKG headband
It's like listening to music with an electron microscope.
 
If you're looking for recording flaws in your music, by all means pick these up, they have no modestly in pointing out every single one. But for pleasure? Forget about it. Simply put, these headphones are too hot in the treble. If you want more nonses tacked on to the end of that sentence please read some other review.

Other stuff:
Soundstage: Imaging is certainly more sophisticated sophisted than the srh840, but it's really only noticeable on classical or live recordings. Still, the effect is not to be understated. It really does add to the effect if your music collection flls under that umbrella.

Design: Shure really knocked it out of the park designing something even doofier looking than the 840. But I think somewhere along the line they realized they had no idea what they're doing and threw in an awesome carrying case and an extra cable and set of earpads to make up for it, so I really can't be too mean about it.

Comfort: Much improved over the 840. Instead of the pleather sweat traps you get soft velour which stays very cool and dry. And instead of having to wear a piece of rubber on the crown of your head you get... a K701 crown-of-thorns style headband. So while I guess Shure still doesn't really understand the whole comfort thing you do get the lesser of two evils here. They also clamp a little harder and aren't as top heavy, so they stay on your head better even if you're a headbanger.
 
Some half assed photography:
shure940.jpg
 
edit: I've gotten rid of these, over time their very revealing and slightly thin character didn't sit well with me. Stunning midrange though, if I get another headphone that at least equals it I'll be very happy.
 
I've also knocked down the value rating, these are certainly detailed and smooth sounding headphones (despite their treble)  but these weren't enjoyable in enough genres for me to justify the asking price.
RapidPulse
RapidPulse
Enjoyed your review...especially the "listening to music with an electron microscope" analogy. I know exactly what you mean. For a while, I was trying to search for the "perfect" headphone. Now I realize there is no such thing. Sometimes you want an electron microscope...sometimes you don't!
kiteki
kiteki
It's a great headphone!
Pizzaiolo
Pizzaiolo
Actually, I thought this was a half-assed REVIEW.
Back
Top