M17 isn't portable, unless you have a back pack and then you have to reach into your backpack to use the interface. I guess it's fine for using around the house and taking it from room to room.

Has anyone read the ASR review and testing of Hugo 2. Please it's terrible. The q7 looks to be smaller than m15.

Also I sold my topping d90se and A90 for a k9 pro and could not be happier. I'm not sure what they did to the k9 pro but it's top end it perfect, no ear fatigue at all. Yet it's not missing any details.

Every time I hear 1 chip vs 2 chip I prefer 2 chip. Don't forget those 1 chip ess design were available when they made the m17 and k9 pro but they went with 2 for a reason.

Doh please no. We just want a more portable m17. Obviously no screen, less features cost saving. Unless you are planning a q9 later.

Most don't care too much on the looks, it will probably have a case anyway. We just want k9 pro or m17 sound. Please keep with 2 chips for dac.

Please keep the same filter or whatever you did with the k9 pro ess. Its so good at the top end, I get zero sibilance. And it has perfect bass.

You can defiantly take what Amir is saying as gospel because he is talking about the factual test results.

Empire Ears Evo limited edition.

Yes and off switch on the front.

What's your location?

I had Dan clark aeon 2 noire and I experienced sibilance. Listening to chord dac/amps I find them bright. The k9 pro is pritty good with everything. Massive attack - I against I. This is a very base heavy track and plays excellent on the k9 pro. Duel of the fates - John Williams. Making water...

It's not overly bright, it's just right. Lots of detail and very musical. FYI my hifi speakers are paradigm persona 9h and dac/processor is a trinnov altitude 16.

In that case I would say k9 pro.

For speakers dac is less important then room eq and correction. You're better off with something that has Dirac or lyngdorf roomperfect.