DaveRedRef-III
500+ Head-Fier
Question for current Blu II owners:
Have any of you checked to see if there is any additional resolution gained on mass strings from Red Book playback. It's been a question that has intrigued me ever since Rob floated specs for the Blu II.
I am sure there will be plenty of inferior Red Book masterings incapable of reproducing mass strings properly but that may not be a fault of the RB protocol. Over the decades many have sighted this as the reason RB fails in comparison to Vinyl or high resolution recordings. I have never been convinced by that argument and I have long suspected it was the inadequacies of the conversion process which let the protocol down rather than a resolution ceiling.
Have any of you checked to see if there is any additional resolution gained on mass strings from Red Book playback. It's been a question that has intrigued me ever since Rob floated specs for the Blu II.
I am sure there will be plenty of inferior Red Book masterings incapable of reproducing mass strings properly but that may not be a fault of the RB protocol. Over the decades many have sighted this as the reason RB fails in comparison to Vinyl or high resolution recordings. I have never been convinced by that argument and I have long suspected it was the inadequacies of the conversion process which let the protocol down rather than a resolution ceiling.