Congrats on the gig! Indeed, the low(er) impedance was a factor so that it would play nice with a wider range of gear including dongles. I'm currently using the iFi Go Bar as I type thisSounds very similar to the position I'm in! I've been working remotely since 2020 but I got laid off last fall, luckily got a job quickly as a contractor, and mid-April got converted to a full-time employee with benefits. Which is great and a big step up for me but now I have to commute downtown three days a week.
I miss my open backs and headphone amp.
I'm hopeful the 620s will allow me to enjoy music more in the office while also being affordable enough I won't obsess over something happening to it, and easy enough to drive over a dongle.
I might be crazy enough to justify something like a DCA E3 in theory but no way am I leaving a $2K headphone on my desk in an open floor office on the off chance it gets stolen.
1) it sounds amazingHello) Sennheiser/
1) At $149 for the 560S, it's a good value overall.
2) One of the advantages of the 560S is its low weight.
3) They say the bolts are falling out. But that's because the 560S has another drawback, more clamping force.
What did they do in 620S))
1) The price is 2 times higher.
2) The weight is much greater.
3) The pressing force is greater.
By reducing the clamping force, there would be no need to insert iron; the structure is already strong.
There is no iron and the price could not be raised so high.
And the weight would be less.
2) it has a more premium build
3) it's personal; the chassis is very well regarded for comfort, but like shoes, car seats, eye glasses, hats, belts, backpacks, etc, there is no one design that appeases 100% of customers (except pizza. we all love pizza).
We feel it outperforms most closed headphones, even those costing more by several factors. We hope you get to try it out for yourself so you can determine if you like how it fits and performs.
Stay updated on Sennheiser at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|