granodemostasa
Headphoneus Supremus
well, obviously... but that's not the notion i'm trying to counteract... i'm trying to say that not all opamp based output stages are junk or rip offs, some of them are quite well designed.
Originally Posted by Cankin /img/forum/go_quote.gif There's one interesting line in your sig but 840c should be cheaper than 2 VDA2s and 2 VAC1s right?? |
Originally Posted by Cankin /img/forum/go_quote.gif sorry, I thought 2 Vda2's are needed for balancing http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f5/cha...ystems-256397/ |
Originally Posted by Bazile /img/forum/go_quote.gif Hi folks; I've hesitated to post here because I'm a bit of a fanboy. I used Audio Alchemy gear for about a decade before I got the CI gear in my sig. (Dusty worked for AA before he founded CI) I love the stuff needless to say. I tried the DAC without the power source some time ago. Basically, I just thought the DAC without the power source sounded quieter (less volume)...and any time volume changes, comparisons are suspect. It seems to me that with a DAC, you either have the power to convert that bit to analog, or you don't. Btw..the links in post 24 and 25 of this thread....I still use the Dac with the cheap tube amps shown in post 28 of the linked thread as my home system. It sounds amazing with HD580's or 600's balanced. With 650's..its a bit too warm/too much bass. Bazile |