The Astell & Kern AK120
Jul 23, 2015 at 9:21 PM Post #6,691 of 7,071
  It's not like they're playing with the codecs. This has to do with resources, buffers, background functions or simple subtleties due to code and registry config. Ears are just very sensitive, especially if dealing with something that's inherently revealing and relatively neutral.

Do you think that iRiver/AK might have changed or tweaked the software digital filters in-between firmware versions? I grabbed an RWAK120-B last fall (2014) that had 1.40 pre-loaded on it, and it provided a very "liquidy" sound that, while hyper-detailed and nuanced, sounded slightly smeared/indistinct at the same time. I installed 1.42 about a month ago and felt that the sound became a little more lively, but it might have just been placebo as any difference between the two seemed insignificant as I listened to it more.
 
Anyway, I just got around to loading 1.32 earlier today (downgraded from 1.42), and the first thing that I noticed when listening to the same track was the gain/volume being less "hot", with more room to adjust the travel on my amp's volume pot. Overall, 1.32 seems to produce a more detailed and less weighty/liquidy sound, with faster transitions and improved dynamics.
 
Could it be possible that maybe AK configured 1.32 using a minimum phase software filter, which they changed (to a linear filter, or some other software adjustment) in newer firmware versions? Just curious if this might be the reason for the differences in sound from 1.32 to 1.4/1.42, or if there might be some other underlying reason for it.
Thanks.
 
Jul 28, 2015 at 5:05 PM Post #6,693 of 7,071
So I just did the output mod running some wires direct from the last transistor tag to the output jack. It's a keeper. I'll go through the FWs again but 1.32 is sounding mighty fine. I had lost some bass with the jh13s and the stock output. jh13s drop to probably below 10 ohms in the bass and maybe the highs as well so the mod warmed it up some.
 
Jul 29, 2015 at 6:05 AM Post #6,694 of 7,071
I'm back to 1.30 on the resistor bypassed unit.which is where I started on a stock unit before upgrading the IEM cable and waiting for it to run in. I just prefer it to 1.32. They're close but 1.30 has slightly better prat and bass delineation for me. 1.37 isn't bad either with great harmonic structure. Smooth with great retrieval. If you like it warmer and more laid back, it's got a nice open texture. I'd probably just go with 1.30 or 1.37 depending on my preference. On a modded DAC unit or different transducer 1.32 may well be the trick but I slightly prefer 1.30 or 1.37 for that general flavor a bit more, as I originally did. I also found that there can be slight variations on install. I snappy install of 1.37 is quite good and may be where I end up. After my twag got fully run in, I've settled on 1.32. Cable is wonderful but needed to settle down for it to be all it could be.
 
Aug 3, 2015 at 10:46 PM Post #6,696 of 7,071

500x500 and in jpg format works for me. 
 
Aug 14, 2015 at 8:53 PM Post #6,697 of 7,071
Hi guys,
 
I'm thinking of buying the ak120 and just had a quick question about syncing it with the iriver software.
 
Does it sync playlists from the software straight onto the device (like iTunes)? Or do you have to create playlists on the device only song by song?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top