It is a bit insulting, I agree. I wish it weren't but that doesn't make it any less true.
But how would Sony "seal it up"? And why would they? If anything, this is increasing their sales
I have to agree with you here.
The components being so sensitive to upgrades.
I do believe Sony intended their players to perform at a certain level, and reserve their best algorithms for their top end units.
A company's drive is sales, more than anything, and so I doubt they would allow the decline in sales of lower units, because of this.
. What I have a problem with is that these exaggerated claims are not supported by any objective proof. And why do I have a problem with that? I just feel it's lowering the quality of the forums, as abstract as sounds
I have to agree with you here again.
There has been much hoopla but the proof in data would probably be hard.
The sound-science forums would have a problem with this, and truthfully, because it is Sony proprietary firmware, I doubt it can be proven as easily as it can be "observed".
Thank you for clarifying your position, and apologies if any offense taken.
I had the Kmod 1z and compared it to stock and we could hear the difference on that alone it was cleaner with more nuance...
Technically speaking, the change of the output caps should be the most noticeable, in theory.
But the explanation of the power caps do make sense because it is such a different design, not using normal dac chip.