vapman
Member of the Trade: bhobuds.com
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Posts
- 8,365
- Likes
- 2,444
Have you got the XB90EX by any chance? If so what are your impressions compared to the Zeros?
Yes, two pairs actually, just in case something happens to them. First the Zero and the 90ex are not even in the same category when it comes to bass impact or refinement.
The Zero doesn't sound any different when amping. The 90ex benefits a lot from amping and scales up well with nicer amps. Weaker sources will be better with the Zero but if you have at least 150-200mW you can get serious sub bass with the 90ex.
Just personal preference but I find the 90ex to have clearer & more balanced mids and treble as well. Most of my listening is done with Aurisonics ASG 2.5 or Yamaha HS8 monitors so that is what I have as a frame of reference. Some people love the 90ex fit, some people don't, there is no disputing the Zero is very comfy and fits well. I will always prefer the xb90ex though.
If you're all about the bass, just get the xb90ex. If you listen to stuff that's got very heavy 60hz and lower or you amp you may be underwhelmed with the zero.
Vapeman , you should have burned them in longer on higher volume using bass heavy music. The midrange is clean full and never stuffy.
I respectfully disagree. For the record I used extremely bass heavy music at normal listening volume. When I got mine the recommended burn in time was 60 hours so I did 120. Now it's at 200 and I already sent mine off. That extra 80 hours of burn in will never change a headphone's sound that drastically.