lindrone
King Canaling
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2003
- Posts
- 3,887
- Likes
- 27
The highs probably has a lot to do with why it has superior sibilance control. At the same time, it doesn't have the sharpness that the UE has. For those who are sensitive to sibilance, this is a very good "feature"... not a detraction.
The highs are also about as clear as the UE, just not as sharp and not as "in your face".
As any experienced Head-Fier know, frequency response charts is not the way to buy headphones. Frequency response chart only tells a part of the story, and really only helps one to verify what a one has already heard from a particular headphone. It makes sense after you've auditioned the headphone to go back and say, "Hey, that makes sense... "...
There's absolutely no one in this world that can tell you what the sound signature of a headphone is like from a frequency response chart.
Furthermore, flat response is a good thing, but flat response alone doesn't tell the quality of the headphone in general either. A radically non-flat response may look bad on charts, but that doesn't say anything about whether or not you'll like the headphone either.
CD3000 doesn't have a flat response by any means, neither does Sennheiser HD580/600/650. I doubt Grado RS-1 has a flat response, although I think HP-1 has a pretty flat response.
Not to even throw in the possibilities of discrepancy on measuring methods...
There was a thread a while back that was titled, "What does frequency response chart mean?" or something like that.. the obvious response from most people were just what I stated above. For some reason that UE wants to make a big deal out of flat response being a holy grail of making good sound. Well, it isn't. It is only one of many approaches to good sound.
The highs are also about as clear as the UE, just not as sharp and not as "in your face".
As any experienced Head-Fier know, frequency response charts is not the way to buy headphones. Frequency response chart only tells a part of the story, and really only helps one to verify what a one has already heard from a particular headphone. It makes sense after you've auditioned the headphone to go back and say, "Hey, that makes sense... "...
There's absolutely no one in this world that can tell you what the sound signature of a headphone is like from a frequency response chart.
Furthermore, flat response is a good thing, but flat response alone doesn't tell the quality of the headphone in general either. A radically non-flat response may look bad on charts, but that doesn't say anything about whether or not you'll like the headphone either.
CD3000 doesn't have a flat response by any means, neither does Sennheiser HD580/600/650. I doubt Grado RS-1 has a flat response, although I think HP-1 has a pretty flat response.
Not to even throw in the possibilities of discrepancy on measuring methods...
There was a thread a while back that was titled, "What does frequency response chart mean?" or something like that.. the obvious response from most people were just what I stated above. For some reason that UE wants to make a big deal out of flat response being a holy grail of making good sound. Well, it isn't. It is only one of many approaches to good sound.