Quote:
Hey, sorry to bother again, but -
The better my IEM fit (tighter seal) the more bone conduction there is, correct?
If it is so, I think I'll just keep my loose fit. Its extremely comfortable and it sounds spectacular. No need to go through more trouble. Even if it isn't, I'm just too scared to ship my IEMs to China unless theres something horribly wrong.
It seems to me that either burn in on BAs are real or my head's getting accustomed to this sound.. this is heaven.
Bone conduction has more to do with surface area of the contact point, and the full shell in the ear and more contact area from the canal provides that additional contact area vs. a universal. Seal is necessary first for bone conduction with the way CIEMs are made, as without a seal the deep bass will roll off and there will be less quantity. But if you are happy, why change it?
Quote:
Hi Joe, I have a question. I am seriously thinking about CIEMs, but as most people here can't afford myself top contenders. I am still thinking about Kozee reshell of TF10 with more balanced tuning. But I wonder are there any better sounding CIEMs with same structure as TF10 dual Woofer + highs and 2-way cross or just Woofer + highs with 2-way cross? What about Kozee X2 did someone here have them to share their impressions? And another question is about 3-way crossover CIEMs. Can you please list what models can you recommend with a tight budget maybe 500$ tops if such exist. As far as I read on your thread top choices for me are: AudioEarz AUD-5X (Quint Balanced Armature with an Integrated 4 way Crossover) 565$, Minerva Mi-3 ((3,3) 3-way 3 BA with the musical tuning; they also offer a flat tuning for musicians) 564$ or Kozee X3 570$. Which would you recommend and are these three better then Kozee TF10 from price/SQ point?
No one on head-fi has heard the X2 to my knowledge. If your budget is $500 tops, you can get the JH5, which many people rave about, or the Clear Tunes CT-200 for a balanced sound signature, which joker has reviewed. Or, spend the least by reshelling your TF10 and buying an aftermarket cable as
some cables make a pretty significant change to the TF10 IMO. At the $500 price point, the Alclair rm3K sounds very good, and if you can stretch the 5X is a great performer, with more of a fun sound. The Mi-3 price went up (I need to update the price in my first post) to abot $614 USD plus shipping, and the X3 while fun doesn't have many advantages vs. the 5X. The TS842 is about $500 and sounds similar to the TF10, but is a step up.
What specific sound are you looking for, and is $500 your budget with impressions, or without? There is also the single dynamic driver from
Aurisonics for $400.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingice10 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Good point @joe, CIEM are not as good as the demos that they have.
@Joe, do you still have the FX700? I want to know if there is a CIEM which can match the timbre on the FX700. I would like to have those sparky highs, unlike my JH16 and a good midrange. I want to point out that my JH16 did not satisfy me on the highs as they are smoothen up and have some timbre issues compared to the dynamic iems such as the FX700. Maybe they are made that way to avoid listening fatigue. But still I want a CIEM that competes with timbre. Thank you for your suggestion.
You mean demos are not as good as the CIEMs, right?
No, I don't have the FX700 any more and haven't owned it about a year. I thought the FX700 had a slightly recessed midrange and artificially enhanced bass and treble, with more of a fun sound signature. The LS8, JH16 (as Mini0510 mentioned), and TS842 are all somewhat similar, but there are differences between BA sound and dynamic driver sound. To me, most of my CIEMs get the timbre right and outperform the FX700 by a bit to significantly, but the tone is different.
Quote:
Just found out EM3pro is really really good for watching movie, my JH11 is nowhere can create such a great imaging like em3pro does
Yes, the EM3 Pro does have very good imaging and depth to the presentation.
Quote:
Here I'm attempting to take a plunge again. Now, into customs.
Currently I'm pretty happy with RE272 equalized, so the new custom must provide at least that good detailing, anything less would be insulting.
The main weaknesses of RE272 are the cable, which is obviously a non-issue for customs (all custom cables I know of are high quality), a bit too little bass and two ugly peaks in the frequency spectrum around 1.5 kHz and 4 kHz, giving it a shouty sound and "looking glass"-like, uneven depth, too forward soundstage. Especially annoying with female vocal.
So far, I've been considering:
1) Spiral Ear SE5 - real expensive even for customs, not sure about bass, these are armatures after all. The review seems to mention huge detail - this would be a plus. Silicone is nice, but I'd prefer vinyl.
2) TS842 - there's supposedly some peaking in the highest treble. Not the most detailed?
Removed. The reports of uneven frequency response are too troubling. I want to get rid of the equalizer, not change its settings to even more complex.
3) UM Merlin - published frequency response indicates a "presence" peak around 7.5 kHz; bass shouldn't be too much, but I wouldn't like any warm coloring
4) UM Miracle - similar as above and also an armature
5) FutureSonics Ear Monitors - quite unknown, but if it's a really hugely refined signature of Atrios w/ MG7... not sure how it stacks up against the armatures in detailing
Thoughts?
If you don't want warm coloring, I think you should also look into the UERM and NT6. Dynamic driver CIEMs that I have heard (including the demo Merlin) have much more bass than the RE lineup I have heard, including the RE272, so take that into account. Some other flatter frequency response IEMs include the Fabs and Alclair rm3K. And, while not flat, the EM4 does vocals very well.