WilliamLeonhart
Headphoneus Supremus
Can't give you specific number but IMO buying the m9xx just for its DAC function is already a bargain. Before I had the chance to try the m9xx I thought I'd save up for the AUne s16, which was the best DAC I've heard yet had very so-so amp section. Worst than the o2 I had. But then I knew I don't have to wait anymore and joined the last m9xx drop (not the one going on).
Now onto the amping section. It drives the k7xx really well and IMO my O2 didn't drive the akg q/k7 effectively. I'm pretty sure the m9xx is the best in the $500 price range. Hope this helps you to come up with a decision.
Now onto the amping section. It drives the k7xx really well and IMO my O2 didn't drive the akg q/k7 effectively. I'm pretty sure the m9xx is the best in the $500 price range. Hope this helps you to come up with a decision.
I am, and I think it's great with the TH-900. It ever so slightly takes the edge off its treble, at least compared to something like the JDS Element. Very happy with the combo, although I wonder if maybe I should move onto a dedicated desktop amp or DAC part, since I don't use the m9xx as a portable at all.
That said, can anyone make an estimate as to how the amp/DAC balances out on the m9xx, in terms of %? For instance, is the m9xx split 50/50 as an amp/DAC, is it 80/20 amp/DAC, 20/80 amp/DAC, etc? Because I know for a lot of these all-in-one amp/DAC combos, sometimes the amp is the better component (I'm thinking of the WA7 Fireflies here), while sometimes the DAC is the better component.
So, does anyone know? Or can make an educated guess?