Now you're talkin my language!!!! However this is the kind of thing I do 24/7... except apparently not when I tested my PT15 the first time. Apparently I had my EQ disabled for the last few days which explains a lot. Oops.
Anyway, put my heavy EQ back on, and found although they're not the bassiest ones I have, they are very very impressive when heavy bass EQ is applied. i commend you for not being scared to boost so much
But I have to admit you're correct.
They do out-bass the TY 650. and the TY 650 did start distorting before the PT15. But regardless they are still bright even with a heavy amount of high frequencies cut out as much as the EQ will allow, and I am not sure if I can say they have better bass quality than the TY 650.
I would be in love with the PT15 if there was more midrange presence and it just wasn't so bright.
P.S. My only MMCX cables were from some IEMs so they have memory wire near next to the MMCX connectors. This annoyed me at first but I quickly found they fit much more comfortably when worn over the ear, kind of like the alternate way of wearing the RX-1.
28dB? ha! try 36dB!
so thanks for posting that or I might have never tried the **** ever again.
.....qian39 still beats both for bass
Edit: in a bass off the PT15 is second only to a stock Qian39 but gets the edge on clarity. Damn, I really overlooked these. I used some car audio subwoofer tests including a resonance test track which lots of earbuds just completely fail at. I need to kill the treble as much as possible when I use them but everything else is spot on. Like I said I wish the mids were more present. All in all, well done ****.
I am fairly positive i will end up re-shelling mine. I constantly disconnect the MMCX by accident and it is maddening. I have to admit hearing these with the bass boosted and highs cut is a whole different thing.