- Joined
- Jun 7, 2007
- Posts
- 7,040
- Likes
- 118
C
Interestingly I have twice been at events where Chord demo the XC and Hugo combination. In their opinion in pairs well.
I liked the XC with the Hugo TT when i heard it at Canjam.
C
Interestingly I have twice been at events where Chord demo the XC and Hugo combination. In their opinion in pairs well.
A discussion topic that hopefully members can direct me to the possible answer. Do you guys think certain DAC chip plays PCM files better than DSD files, despite them supporting both format negatively? I ask this as I sense calyx M deals with DXD file better than DSD.
The way I test it is using 2L nordic test files available free online. I feel DXD is able to maintain the 'organic' sound of DSD while keeping the higher frequency more vibrant and less harsh, which to me DSD can sound harsh at time.
Chord hugo is different, it seem to be immune to whether playing 16/44.1, DXD, DSD it all sounds the same, at least to me and that is not a bad thing. Honestly even lossy files sound darn good.
Using XiVero GmbH I am testing their XiSRC file, worth every cent in my opinion. The ISP feature alone worth the purchase. I am really enjoying all this new findings. While I cant say I hear the different when using HUGO but with my other players, like calyx M, I can hear a different which is pleasing to my ears.
Do different DAC chips have a preferred format?
curious if we can use the ifi ipower on the chord hugo to further improve the SQ ?
And why on God's earth would you want to modify it?
a cheap upgrade can be to put a snap on ferrite core on the Hugo power cord just before the pin. I am waiting for the these kind of clips cheaply available on net. I have placed these clips on digital coaxial cable between Hugo and blu Ray player and there were improvements in imaging. I have put these clips on the power cord of blu Ray player also besides putting audioquest jiiterbug on both USB inputs of blu Ray player. with these little investments the sound improved further in the areas of dynamics, imaging and over all blacker background.
noise can also create jitter. jitterbug actually cleans the USB power and thus reduces the possibility of jitter. ferrite core on USB cable should improve the sound quality even with Hugo. there is no harm in using the trick anyway.
noise can also create jitter. jitterbug actually cleans the USB power and thus reduces the possibility of jitter. ferrite core on USB cable should improve the sound quality even with Hugo. there is no harm in using the trick anyway.
USB cables can make a difference to the sound - not due to source jitter (as this is completely removed by Hugo), but due to the amount of RF noise that gets injected into the ground plane of Hugo. More RF noise, more noise floor modulation, which makes it sound brighter. Unfortunately, I suspect some expensive USB cables actually make RF noise levels worse, so it will sound brighter and give the impression of more detail. So my advice is to be careful if it sounds brighter!
Another issue is signal dependent ground currents that are distorted - these currents come from the source when processing the data - but the cable can't do much to change this, as it is a low frequency error. Galvanic isolation can be made to work to solve both the RF noise injection, and the distorted signal dependent ground currents. These ground currents affect sound stage depth, as the corrupting signals are at their worst when the data crosses through zero, as all the bits switch from all 0's to all 1's and vice versa - so it degrades low level details, which are the cues for depth perception.
Rob
noise can also create jitter. jitterbug actually cleans the USB power and thus reduces the possibility of jitter. ferrite core on USB cable should improve the sound quality even with Hugo. there is no harm in using the trick anyway.