dguitarnut
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2013
- Posts
- 181
- Likes
- 30
I think your problem is your headphones. My TH 900 is my go to when I'm in the mood for hard hitting bass.
And some people are never happy. Others just want something to talk about incessantly. Not happy, after 400 hours. Move on.
Note: I live darkwave. I find the Hugo/Audeze LCD-X sublime. Listening to This Mortal Coil, one of the remastered releases.
elviscaprice - how do you find the LCD x and hugo combo for other genres like classical, jazz, female vocals . I sold my LCD 2 and th900 before getting the Hugo so didn't have a chance to test. but knowing their soundsignuture I know they won't work for me. need a bit of lushness in the mids that the th900 didn't give me (they are a great set of cans for rock, electronica etc) and there ius no way the Hugo will properly drive the lcd2 well not the way a drove them with a burson soloist. I thought I'll go all portable but miss a full size can now.
by the way, Hugo, dx90 and fitear tg334 is just a fantastic combo for my ears.
Currawong, the USB power supply question was taken out of context.
Have you given sufficient time to burn in those LCD 2.2? Or are you using them brand new, if so try burning them in for 200 hours or so before you judge them, same goes for the Hugo. Most equipment needs time in use before they sound their best.
Molika,
I am big on classical (especially Opera) with a smattering of jazz. New Wave 80's is my forte with dark wave being a preference. Of course I am diverse with other genres. I find the X's a good compromise for all my genre listening.
Most importantly, I don't like my music loud, especially with cans on. I find the Hugo/LCD-X a match made in heaven for my preferences. As discussed earlier by many folks, the Hugo is a live music persons heaven and the LCD-X just amplifies that, I concur. It's in your face, and if your like me, like your volume level just low enough to capture all the sonics/stage presentation but not too high to fatigue, then I think this match is very good, the Hugo/LCD-X, reference sound at it's best.
But if you like to hear your music very loud with your cans, then it will feel too harsh and fatiguing over time with the Hugo/LCD-X combo.
Note: Even at live events, if the music is too loud, it will have a fatiguing effect on me. The Hugo is no different.
Molika,
I would think that with an impedance of 70 ohms on the LCD 2, that it would be driven well with the Hugo? I don't know anything about it's sound signature. But from what I've read the LCD-X or new LCD 3 are great choices over the LCD 2.
Listening currently to Cecilia Bartoli in Chant D'Amour, redbook. Excellent sonics with the Hugo/LCD-X.
ted have you tried a caps server with the hugo , in a usb connection ?? and if so what improvements were noted.
also regarding the 24/7 power cycle . Are the facts you claim from something we can measure or from listening.
al
thx mate, much appreciated. yeah i like my goth/dark wave stuff as well and assumed the lcd x will be good (i was listening to dead can dance sacd earlier today and just fantastic). Like you i dont like my music to loud. re lcd 2, LCD2 need high current which im not sure the hugo and deliver. i've never heard a portable amp and ive tried a few drive them like the soloist or the v200 which are a few mid tier amps. again, i haven't heard the lcd 2 with the hugo but if i go on whats been said in the last few pages of this thread i dont think its a good match. cheers