thebasso
100+ Head-Fier
Hmm, interesting concept. I would like to see where this goes.
So here's a question. Even though they sound much better with a good amp and dac, do they sound worse than "mid-fi" headphones when they are run out of an ipod?
Just to play devil's advocate here, what would sound better?
a) ipod-> LCD-2
b) mid-fi source (300-500), mid-fi amp (300-500), mid-fi headphones (300-500- K701, HD6x0, DT880, etc)
My suspicion is that while the headphones in rig B would be putting out closer to their full potential than the LCD2 in rig A, the LCD-2 might still sound better if you like their sound signature because they have much more potential to begin with. Maybe you don't have to get more than 80% out of them to beat the "mid-fi" dynamics by quite a bit. I mean an LCD-2 amped by the ipod doesn't suddenly sound like an HD650 right? It is still faster, more detailed, lower distortion, more capable, etc right? It still doesn't sound like a dynamic headphone.
Not that this is what people should shoot for, because the LCD-2 is capable of more, but is it still better than the alternatives? Esp considering the possibility of future upgrades?
I remember someone said he liked the LCD2 better than the Edition 8 out of the ipod. Not bad I guess
I think that was that post: http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/509397/ed-8-vs-he-5-le-lcd-2#post_6884809
OK but you get my point. It is not a "conventional dynamic", it is a planar magnetic with much greater ability than the mid-fi conventional dynamics.
Maybe you would go with rig B then? No, I'm not going to use them as portables except for maybe around the house, I just think this is an interesting question that isn't discussed much on head-fi.
I think buy lcd2, its good sound on ipod?
its comfortable/?
So here's a question. Even though they sound much better with a good amp and dac, do they sound worse than "mid-fi" headphones when they are run out of an ipod?
Just to play devil's advocate here, what would sound better?
a) ipod-> LCD-2
b) mid-fi source (300-500), mid-fi amp (300-500), mid-fi headphones (300-500- K701, HD6x0, DT880, etc)
My suspicion is that while the headphones in rig B would be putting out closer to their full potential than the LCD2 in rig A, the LCD-2 might still sound better if you like their sound signature because they have much more potential to begin with. Maybe you don't have to get more than 80% out of them to beat the "mid-fi" dynamics by quite a bit. I mean an LCD-2 amped by the ipod doesn't suddenly sound like an HD650 right? It is still faster, more detailed, lower distortion, more capable, etc right? It still doesn't sound like a dynamic headphone.
Not that this is what people should shoot for, because the LCD-2 is capable of more, but is it still better than the alternatives? Esp considering the possibility of future upgrades?
Quote:I think buy lcd2, its good sound on ipod?
its comfortable/?
If iPod use is a priority and you are ready to drop that kind of coin on cans to accomplish it, you might want to check out the Beyer T5's which are made specifically with that in mind, and, if they sound anything like the T1's they are based upon (which reportedly they do sound similar, though not identical), they probably do a damn fine job via a home box packing more punch, once you are ready to go that route. Just a thought.