Quote:
Ed, Sorry for blowing up, its all very frustrating though and there were many posts laying blame. I for one am not immune to mistake.
Ken
No worries, Ken. I think we're finally closing on clearing up the confusion. You know what they say about assumptions. You make an Ass of U and some guy named Umptions.
Quote:
Look, I listened to both pair, stock and the ALO cabled pair on the new Cavalli amp. I definitely preferred the stock pair to the ALO cabled pair. Not sure what was the cause of the difference, but it was indeed noticeable. So Ed is not alone.
FWIW, it looks like there is very little difference in the cables as measured. As I stated before, I only listened to the ALO cabled LCD-2. I saw that Tyll was measuring the stock cabled LCD-2. And now Tyll posted the results here: http://sites.google.com/a/headphonehobbylab.org/filehost/home/files/CanJam2010HeadphoneMeasurements.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1
As you can see, there isn't a huge difference between the different LCD-2 measurements. So whatever the differences in cables may be, they are not those that can be measured to a great degree. I only take measurements with a grain of salt to a certain extent. And I take Meet listening impressions with a huge rock of salt. I don't trust meet impressions for such fine comparisons as cables, especially. Too little time, too much distractions, too much ambient noise.
-Ed