Quote:
The K3003 arrived today. I've only had very brief time with them but in that short time I can declare the bass filters a complete waste of time. AKG might as well scrap those, they aren't doing anyone any favors. I like both the reference and treble filters and will need to spend plenty time with both.
The immediate problem I have is insertion depth. I don't really think the stock tips do the K3003 complete justice as I find deeper insertion improves the treble response, tone and timbre, much the same way it does for the CK10. I tried my Meelec triple flanges that come with the A161p and those work very well, I'm just worried about stretching the stems out too much with the thicker nozzle of the K3003. I'll have to experiment more with other tips.
I can see the concern over the upper portion of the cable above the split. Where the cable exits the strain reliefs are an area of concern and I would definitely source buying the non microphone version.
It's amazing just how small the housings are. Much smaller than I anticipated.
I'm one of those lucky people who 95% of the time gets a perfect fit with stock tips, and it's generally the stock medium ones that tend do the trick for me. Having said that, I'm not so sure deeper insertion will benefit the K3003s, or that AKG intended such type of fit. One thing you have to be careful with is not blocking the vents found at the base of the nozzles. I wonder, too, whether deeper insertion will really "improve the treble response, tone and timbre" --- perhaps in
your case it will --after all, our ears and ear canals are different, apart from the obvious fact that we may have (slightly) different takes on what proper "treble response, tone and timbre" is-- but I do have to wonder whether bass response may suffer (if only a little) as a result of such deep insertion. I'm pretty curious to see how you'll hear things as you experiment with diff tips.
With regards to the cable above the Y-split, I honestly don't find any issues there with the non-remote model; if these IEMs are not abused, and are taken care of, I don't see why there should be any cable issues at all (I wear my K3003s with the cable down, not over the ear, BTW). My guess is these cables should last many years, and certainly way beyond the two-year warranty period.
Those (like shotgunshane) auditioning bizkit's K3003 set (on the K3003 loaner tour) should know that bizkit purchased 3 (or was it 4?) K3003 sets (because, I believe, he spends time in different countries and prefers to have an AKG set in each country), and he has stated a couple of times that he tends to abuse his IEMs. Perhaps bizkit sent his 'worst' K3003 pair on the loaner tour? I seem to remember bizkit saying he went through 3 (?) sets of EX1000s within a short period of time -- I personally used my EX1000s extensively for 8 months and had no cable issues, and when I sold them, the cable looked as good as new, but I'm someone who does look after their gear. There have been three other members who have spent some time with bizkit's K3003s, two of whom have kept them for a long time --- obviously we don't know how they themselves treated the AKGs, even when they may claim they were passed on to the next person in the exact same condition they were received (sadly, it's a fact that many people don't look after the gear they borrow).
Quote:
I'm not a fan of the treble filters either, makes them uneven imo and sacrifices too much of their low volume dynamics.
I agree the "treble boost" filter affects low volume dynamics -- I, however, might not say "too much", but it's clearly pretty noticeable.