music_4321
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Posts
- 5,120
- Likes
- 340
That seems to be the case.
Anybody know what happened to Bizkit's K3003 tour?
lee730, how did they perform with classical / movie music ?
I have bought my Akg K 3003 on 31.11.2011 from the first badge with the Serien Number below 1000.
one month a go i wenn by my friend House and tried his Akg K 3003 with the Serien Number above 2000
As i compare A and B with my Akg K 3003 from the first badge with the serien number below 1000 , his Akg K 3003 with the serien
number above 2000 has better tonal balance , better Sound Quality specialy the mid sound fuller and full body than mine .
As i met another friend got from RMA , he has BINB from the new badge with the serien number above 2000 and as i compare with my
friend from the first badge , the sound quality from the new badge with the serien number above 2000 is better.
my conculsion : The new badge with the serien number above 2000 has better Sound Quaity
more refinement , more body , better tonal balance.
My first badge sound a bit thiner in mid amd tonal balance is not so good like the new badge .
at the end i sold mine first badge and bought my new badge with serien number above 2000.
This is my personal impression
Anybody know about this sound quality improvement from Akg K 3003 , please share here.
Very interesting. In a way I hope your claims are valid because that would means if I'm enjoying the older model AKG the newer revision could be even more enjoyable. It kinda sounds like the newer ones aren't as disjointed or have more coherency from your comments.
My first K3003 pair (the remote/mic version) was purchased on 2nd January 2012, serial number 029X. I got my second K3003 pair (non-remote/mic model) 5 months later, serial number 24XX.
There was a one-month gap between both pairs, ie I had no K3003 for a whole month. I spent most of that month with the exceptionally good FI-BA-SS, which to these ears goes head-to-head with the AKGs, that is, both are absolutely brilliant-sounding IEMs. When I got my second K3003 pair, I didn't seem to notice a difference --or improvement, in this case-- in SQ between the old and new sets but, obviously, I didn't do a direct comparison so I cannot really say rudi0504 is wrong.
---------------------------------
That said, although both K3003 pairs I've owned have had a wonderful and distinct DD bass type sound --with excellent extension, BTW-- I did not then, and do not now, hear the coherence issues described by some people, an issue that, curiously enough ---as is VERY often seen on Head-fi--- only seemed to become apparent once a single member happened to mention it, a member who is quite influential on HF (and seems to have a rather strong following, not unlike that of Joker), with plenty of credibility, but someone who, in my view, clearly did not test the K3003s properly, and in less than ideal circumstances, coupled with what I personally found to be a (strong) bias against AKG, which is now owned by Harman. From that point onwards, it seems that almost everyone who now listens to this IEM --and has come across such views-- has got to say that there are so-called coherence issues. Perhaps there really is some kind of coherence issue after all, but I can't help thinking that the way it's been 'discovered'/'detected' AND described by some in the last few months is not only far from accurate, but often rather exaggerated. It's as if ---and I'm sorry to be so blunt--- mentioning such issues one gained more credibility, much like those who tend to use plenty of audio terms to appear credible, knowledgeable & experienced.
While I personally can generally tell the difference between a dynamic driver type bass from a balanced armature type bass, I find that AKG managed to implement both types of drivers/technology brilliantly in the K3003s. Like I said to Inks over a month ago -- if I read some of the things that have been written about the K3003s from a particular point in time (a few months back) onwards, I would not like to try, let alone purchase, the K3003s.
Is the K3003 my favourite IEM? No, it isn't at present. The Piano Forte IX is my favourite IEM currently, but it is one IEM I would most certainly NOT recommend to most people because of possible serious fit issues, the near complete lack of isolation and, specially, the very peculiar type of sound signature these IEMs have, which several (or perhaps many) people would simply not appreciate. The Piano Forte IX, being a single DD IEM could even be said to be somewhat 'flawed', or rather imperfect in a way, although its imperfections seem to be intentional, ie the PF IX's distinct flavour was intended that way.
FWIW, I honestly don't know which IEM I prefer between the K3003 and the FI-BA-SS -- that's how much I really love the latter, but I'd still recommend the K3003 to more people if they can afford the AKGs. The rather peculiar and somewhat puzzling 'rawness', amongst other things, of the FI-BA-SS will not be everyone's cup of tea, but several people who 'get it', and also happen to get a good fit, seem to get hooked.
3 of us have heard 3 Akg k 3003 with the series number above 2000, all 3 sound identical and have better sq than ours first badge with the series number below 1000