SOUNDAWARE M1(PRO) Portable Player with Proprietary FPGA Architecture
Apr 17, 2016 at 3:10 PM Post #781 of 1,094
has anyone had experience comparing the m1pro to aune m2 or m2s and opus#1 and plenue 1?i have the P1 but still curious if it would be worthy to upgrade to another DAP based on pure SQ.

 
Hi,
At some point of time in the Head-Fi world, we all have gone through the same problems when it come to choose the best gear to upgrade or buy. The world best is very relative and subjective matter. If let's say Esther is better than M2S or AK120ii that's just one man's opinion and relative to their past gear experience and sound preference.
I tend to stick to the same reviewer whom I found has a similarity in taste, gear collections and sound preference. This way I can relate to their reviews a little bit better.
Some reviews out there like to mention how good a certain DAP or headphone sounds and mention every detail about it but very few or none comparison of other gear and this sounds like an Ad to me.
Bottom line, you can't rely too much on other's opinion but your self. That's why I go to shows, and meetings to hear it for my self.
 
Anyway, I wrote a little review (I don't normally write reviews) about M2S and comparison vs AK120ii and Hugo. These two gears a highly regarded as the reference sound.
http://www.head-fi.org/products/aune-m2-32bit-dsd-portable-music-player/reviews/15468
 
and there is another opinion about this:
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/768366/aune-m2/405#post_12512832
 
Hope that helps 
beerchug.gif
 
 
Apr 17, 2016 at 11:40 PM Post #782 of 1,094

Hi Mikopan,
Hope below setting could help to solve some of your problems:
 
4. enter into the Setting, select 'Power Off Option' set Auto/Smart Power Off or Power Key Setting as your need. Smart power off means power off only when no playing or no operation.
6. When in the Main menu, to go back to the folder, you could first Press Menu button go to the playing interface, then press the back button, you will see the expected folder. It is added in the 066 firmware. Please PM me your email address, I will send you 066 FW.
9. We supply beta test to Chinese users and some foreign users. But will consider public. Thanks for your opinion.
11. So sad about your buttons, actually any user who receive defective device has the right to return or exchange the device. Did you exchange it? 
 
Any other questions, please PM to us.
tongue.gif
 
 
Soundaware Stay updated on Soundaware at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/Soundaware-Audio-CoLtd-140035019979865/ https://www.us.soundaware.net/ Soundaware Official market@soundaware.net
Apr 20, 2016 at 8:09 AM Post #783 of 1,094
just received the M1 PRO today.  the following are SQ impressions only - we know about the UI.  

Initial impressions are WOW WOW WOW! A nice step up from the Calyxm with amazing detail and natural sound.  Instruments sound natural like never before - layering and 3d is beautiful. Its still a digital sound, but less digital than any other player Ive heared/owned. Getting 'closer' to a tube sound...(but of course no 2nd order harmonics). Mids really shine.  No problem with impedance matching with my roxannes so far - seems to take out the slight sibilance i observed with the calyxm paring around 8k. But the treble is all there - not rolled. And the bass comes when you need it as per the recording. Once again im hearing things ive not heard before with this step up. Ive briefly auditioned the ak240 and hated the digital sound - not my cup of tea. M1Pro is natural, slightly warm, and detailed/technical all in one.   
 
Apr 20, 2016 at 10:36 AM Post #784 of 1,094
  just received the M1 PRO today.  the following are SQ impressions only - we know about the UI.  

Initial impressions are WOW WOW WOW! A nice step up from the Calyxm with amazing detail and natural sound.  Instruments sound natural like never before - layering and 3d is beautiful. Its still a digital sound, but less digital than any other player Ive heared/owned. Getting 'closer' to a tube sound...(but of course no 2nd order harmonics). Mids really shine.  No problem with impedance matching with my roxannes so far - seems to take out the slight sibilance i observed with the calyxm paring around 8k. But the treble is all there - not rolled. And the bass comes when you need it as per the recording. Once again im hearing things ive not heard before with this step up. Ive briefly auditioned the ak240 and hated the digital sound - not my cup of tea. M1Pro is natural, slightly warm, and detailed/technical all in one.   

 
The esther is really quite them gem huh? :wink:
 
For the price, you really couldn't go wrong! plus, how often now do we get a DAP that is actually sensibly sized, not to mention, one that also sounds so good!
 
Apr 20, 2016 at 1:39 PM Post #786 of 1,094
I know, that's something I've been wondering too. Well my guess is just that soundaware isn't as fanciful looking or as well marketed in the international market, something that I think is a real pity!
 
 
@sonickarma, you gotta get yours soon, get the M1pro! If you liked the analog, the M1pro will blow you away! musical and lush without being overly thick and coloured, but with a way better sense of space and resolution than the analog.
 
You know, the M1pro, along with the M1pro studio edition, I honestly have not heard a single person comment poorly on the sound before, and yes, I've let quite a couple of people try them out!
 
They're without a doubt my go to DAPs now, not just becase of the amazing sound quality, but also because of the size, I just love how they slip into my pocket so unobtrusively.
 
Apr 20, 2016 at 2:15 PM Post #787 of 1,094
Having owned several AK daps, including the AK240, I'd say it's based on a few things. Looks, UI, and of course the most ridiculous thing, bragging rights. AK devices all sounded great to me, but their looks and UI are also top class.

Sound wise, they are both extremely different. I don't own the AK anymore, but from memory I think I'd prefer the Esther. If I had to chose though, based on all factors, I'd keep the AK because of the UI, eq, and looks. Sound I loved both but prefer that smooth sound from Esther. Really is amazing.
 
Apr 20, 2016 at 3:31 PM Post #788 of 1,094
  I know, that's something I've been wondering too. Well my guess is just that soundaware isn't as fanciful looking or as well marketed in the international market, something that I think is a real pity!
 
 
@sonickarma, you gotta get yours soon, get the M1pro! If you liked the analog, the M1pro will blow you away! musical and lush without being overly thick and coloured, but with a way better sense of space and resolution than the analog.
 
You know, the M1pro, along with the M1pro studio edition, I honestly have not heard a single person comment poorly on the sound before, and yes, I've let quite a couple of people try them out!
 
They're without a doubt my go to DAPs now, not just becase of the amazing sound quality, but also because of the size, I just love how they slip into my pocket so unobtrusively.

biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif

 

 

 
Apr 20, 2016 at 10:11 PM Post #792 of 1,094
Also dual sd card and line and coaxial out, strange why this is not as popular as AK or MoJo


New, small, obscure company (SOUNDAWARE) vs. well-established company with serious brand-recognition (A&K)...

Despite Esther sounding amazing with most of my gear, it does need work on UI and power management as of the last time I used it a couple months ago. Since then, I've let some of my HD buddies try it (including warrior1975), and they've all loved the sound but some have also commented (as did I) that Esther's relatively high output impedance hamstrings it as far as TOTL multi-BA IEM are concerned. If SOUNDAWARE takes heed of our suggestions for improvement, future iterations are going to be simply amazing!
 
Apr 20, 2016 at 10:55 PM Post #793 of 1,094

 
Did you get both???
 
Man that's awesome! And yes, firmwares are compatible with all versions of the M1 and M1Pro!
 
Also, buddy, give it time to open up, takes about 120-150 hours to really start to shine, and past 200 to really stabilise. The sound opens up, transparency, staging all improves noticeably. 
 
 
What are the differ between the two? I'm seriously considering ordering one.

 
I did actually mention the differences between the 4 models, I'll just do a quick recap here.
 
M1 Analog: This version is extremely thick, syrupy and rich. The sound they're going for here is extreme musicality.
 
M1 Vitality: This version goes for clarity, details, as well as a nice open soundstage. The aim is for a vibrant and lively sound.
 
Now according to the chief designer at soundaware, both the M1 versions, while very good, arent the most natural. The analog is very warm and rich, and the Vitality presents detail in a slightly unnatural way, very accentuated. Of course, This is not to say that they are bad, because they definitely are not. Instead, they are made to cater to different tastes. The Analog is meant for older recordings, the classics, while the vitality is targeted at younger listeners with more modern, mainstream music.
 
M1Pro: The M1Pro is actually the M1 Analog with femto clocks. It is still lush and musical, albeit much more accurate than the analog, much less coloured. It is still, however, smooth and has a richness. Technically, however, the femtos actually make a big difference, bringing the resolution and soundstaging up to the level of the vitality's
 
M1Pro Studio Edition: This is the M1 Vitality with femto clocks. Now this version is not yet launched, I have the only beta unit available currently (apart from the one that the soundaware designer has himself). This is an incredible sounding player. Extremely natural, open, extremely detailed and transparent. As the name suggests, the sound that the soundaware designer is going for is a reference sound.
 
Now with the M1Pros, the addition of the femto clock, along with a couple more component upgrades (I am told however, that the differences are predominantly brought by the femto clocks), really does make the players sound very very natural indeed, while the analog has a slightly more musical take on the sound. I've compared them to most of the top of the line DAPs, and compared to say the questlye qp1r, the questyle really wows, the details are so clear, the dynamics are incredible, but the questlye sounds a little unnatural even though it really impressed me. It just seems to present the detail a little too obviously, not quite how things are in real life. With the M1Pro Studio edition, the details are all there, no doubt about that, but they're presented much more naturally.
 
Apr 21, 2016 at 12:20 AM Post #795 of 1,094
Thank you WCDchee great explanation, I appreciate you taking the time to explain it again. I have to tip my hat to these guys, that sound... So damn good.


If you liked the analog so much, the M1pro will blow your mind.

It's nowhere near as coloured as the analog, but the lushness and smoothness are there.

In fact I'm listening to it now while the studio is with a Friend, who's also enjoying the heck out of it :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top