[REVIEW] Aurisonics ASG-2 & 2.5 (with many comparisons)
May 23, 2013 at 6:55 PM Post #121 of 7,021
Quote:
After much consideration I'm selling my ASG-2. The major problems I have are with the mid-bass emphasis and corresponding lack of sub-bass. Like eke said earlier, the bass port affects mid-bass more than sub bass, so if I want an acceptable amount of mid-bass then sub-bass extension suffers.

Honestly with mid-bass where I want it on the ASG-2, I can discern more sub-bass detail on the ER4S!

Also the mids. Trent Reznor's vocals on Pretty Hate Machine by NIN are buried, and there is sibilance on just about every "s".

I could say more but the ASG-2 just isn't what I'm looking for, and these issues keep me from enjoying them on a lot of tracks.

If anyone's interested send me a pm.

 
 
I PM'd you.....
 
May 23, 2013 at 6:56 PM Post #122 of 7,021
Quote:
 
 
I PM'd you.....

 
Responded 
size]

 
May 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM Post #127 of 7,021
It's true the ER4 is my benchmark.


I came from an ER4 and from what you describe it seems you would enjoy the sound of a TG334 more.

I've been quite keen on hybrid designs and hope to get a chance to try the ag2, rdb+, 1plus2 etc soon.
 
May 23, 2013 at 8:15 PM Post #128 of 7,021
Quote:
 
It's true the ER4 is my benchmark. The reason that it has a bump at ~2kHz is because that's how sound from a diffuse field reaches the eardrum. Mid-frequencies are boosted by the shape of the ear. Iems bypass that boost, and so they need to reproduce it to mimic sound from the air. The exact boost that everyone needs is different, but for me the ER4S (with red filters to warm it up just a bit) sounds the most like sound coming from a diffuse field. Experiments with many people have shown that those people report that iems with a bump at ~2kHz sound the most like a reference speaker. Without the mid-emphasis, iems don't sound like realistic sounds to me, and to people involved in these experiments. If people had reported something differently, then we would have a different diffuse field reference. Why more iem companies don't use the DF target baffles me. This is how TOTL full size headphones and speakers sound (with a bit more bass compared to the ER4S admittedly). I'm not actually sure most companies are following any target whatsoever, since people will buy just about anything these days. 
 
When listening to the ASG-2, too often all I think about is MID-BASS and TREBLE SPIKE, which is very distracting. For many tracks it isn't as apparent, and they sound quite accurate, but those tend to be simple acoustic tracks. But for albums by Muse and Queen, for example, vocals are just missing the mid/upper-mid emphasis, and then "S's" and "T's" are quite forward and sharp comparatively in an unnatural way. Freddie Mercury should sound strong and forward especially in the upper registers, which is not the case. He actually sounds a bit behind in the mix on most tracks. 
 
 Eke do you think the sub-bass is too far behind the mid-bass? And how about the treble compared to the GR07? I think the ASG-2 is definitely more treble forward than the GR07. 

 
And I found the bump to be pretty nasal, though that was on the ER6, plus there seemed to me like there was a severe lack of bass on the ER6. I don't know how closely the er6 and er4 are related though.
 
As for the treble spike, I never hear sibilance unless it's in the recording. Like shotgunshane, flysweep, and ericp10 have mentioned, the AS-2 is always smooth but will show what's in the recorded treble. However, I'm pretty sure the ASG-2's treble is more laid back than the GR07's. 
 
Yes the bass ratio is not my ideal. Nothing I can say about that 
biggrin.gif

 
 
I came from an ER4 and from what you describe it seems you would enjoy the sound of a TG334 more.

I've been quite keen on hybrid designs and hope to get a chance to try the ag2, rdb+, 1plus2 etc soon.
 
 
I don't think he'd like that either. Both are pretty close in sound sig (check 2nd post for more detail).
 
Gnarl, I think you'd love the HD600. I own one right now, and it sounds like exactly the sound signature you want. 

 
May 23, 2013 at 8:26 PM Post #130 of 7,021
Quote:
 
And I found the bump to be pretty nasal, though that was on the ER6, plus there seemed to me like there was a severe lack of bass on the ER6. I don't know how closely the er6 and er4 are related though.
 
As for the treble spike, I never hear sibilance unless it's in the recording. Like shotgunshane, flysweep, and ericp10 have mentioned, the AS-2 is always smooth but will show what's in the recorded treble. However, I'm pretty sure the ASG-2's treble is more laid back than the GR07's. 
 
Yes the bass ratio is not my ideal. Nothing I can say about that 
biggrin.gif

 
 

 
That's weird. Sibilance was an issue in many more tracks than I'm used to. Freddie Mercury especially. But I'm also used to the slight dip at 8k on the ER4S, so that might have something to do with it. It'd be great if someone else could get a ASG-2/GR07 comparison in here. I think they definitely share a common sound signature.   
 
May 23, 2013 at 8:32 PM Post #131 of 7,021
Quote:
 
That's weird. Sibilance was an issue in many more tracks than I'm used to. Freddie Mercury especially. But I'm also used to the slight dip at 8k on the ER4S, so that might have something to do with it. It'd be great if someone else could get a ASG-2/GR07 comparison in here. I think they definitely share a common sound signature.   

 
Funny. I remember soundbear saying there was almost no treble 
redface.gif

 
I think they're pretty different, especially in the ass emphasis. Mids on the ASG-2 are also slightly warmer. GR07 highs aren't as refined either.
 
May 23, 2013 at 8:34 PM Post #132 of 7,021
Quote:
 
I think they're pretty different, especially in the ass emphasis. Mids on the ASG-2 are also slightly warmer. GR07 highs aren't as refined either.

What kind of earphones are these?!
 
May 23, 2013 at 8:36 PM Post #134 of 7,021
Quote:
 
I think they're pretty different, especially in the ass emphasis. Mids on the ASG-2 are also slightly warmer. GR07 highs aren't as refined either.
 

 
Agreed on the last two points. Not sure about the ass emphasis though... 
size]

 
May 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM Post #135 of 7,021
Quote:
What kind of earphones are these?!

 
Didn't you hear that Aurisonics partnered up with Kim Kardashian? 
rolleyes.gif

 
 
 
 
 
Ok, I have a possible solution for you gnarl. In the pic below, you'll see sawn off T-500s. I used these back in the day on the FX700 to lessen the brutal impact of the bass. They work the same here, cutting the bass impact and increasing apparent rumble, while the shorter design prevents high freq loss. Try that if you have some handy.
 
 
 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top