- Joined
- Aug 2, 2014
- Posts
- 4,443
- Likes
- 2,961
I'd take LCD-X above Edition X any day. More musical, way more refined bass.
Agreed. HEX is not very impressive for the price. Which is pretty ironic, given that it is supposed to be a "budget" HEK.
I'd take LCD-X above Edition X any day. More musical, way more refined bass.
Agreed. HEX is not very impressive for the price. Which is pretty ironic, given that it is supposed to be a "budget" HEK.
The Lcd-X would be what I call the weakest out of my 3 headphones but it is still pretty darn good. I would say the headphones I own are all within a couple of percent of each other and more different flavors than one is better. I like the Lcd-x with electronic and rap.
I've been toying with LCDX. I would get it for solo piano and very small ensembles, as well as making older/poorly recorded recordings sound better. Obviously it can't compete with HD800 in terms of soundstage, neutrality, detail retrieval, etc.
I've been toying with LCDX. I would get it for solo piano and very small ensembles, as well as making older/poorly recorded recordings sound better. Obviously it can't compete with HD800 in terms of soundstage, neutrality, detail retrieval, etc.
I'm surprised you're not going for a boss speaker amp instead, given you now have the HE-6 and the K1K.
What specific models do you recommend?
I'd ask @ohhgourami in the HE-6 thread. He knows way more about speaker amps than I do.
That thread always makes me feel inadequate. The disdain for less exotic systems and disbelief that someone could enjoy them has put me off.
I'm new to headphones, but really into high-end audio and acoustics. Just bought a pair of new HD800 (old model not sure how to pluralize it). My Serial number is 459xx where xx is a secret two digit number.
I attempted to measure my HD800 headphones. I realize this is half a$$ed, but I'm not going to buy a $10k+ setup to measure my first pair of real headphones. I used my Steinberg UR22mkII and Earthworks M30 mic to measure the HD800, but had to set gain all the way up on the phono jack as shown. Using RoomEQ (REW) with no curve smoothing at all. After measuring my acoustical treated room probably 50-100 times, never seen such a clean measurement!
Absolutely could not get a "spike" at 6kHz (in this one position). Of course, this is probably expected as I'm using foam and it should do a decent job absorbing above 150Hz. This makes me think the 6kHz issue is a consequence of reflections from using a proper HATS measurement jig to more accurately model the acoustic space of the ear. It could also be that I need to try more than one position. Going to do a re-measure.
Personally, I'm really surprised how flat the freq resp is; +/-5dB down to 10Hz without my ear forming the proper acoustic chamber! The impulse looks ideal. Only thing not ideal looking is the decay times for the low frequencies, but that just shows you how the foam is absorbing only the higher frequencies.
Thanks for your fabulous home made measurements. Even if they don't use HATS or match those of others, they are so useful as relative measurements to assess such changes as when you go to balanced XLR. Great post!