Pictures of Your Portable Rig (part XVI)
Dec 24, 2012 at 5:55 AM Post #931 of 37,648
Quote:
Those 'phones are beautiful, RAFA 
beerchug.gif

 
Thank you sir.
 
Dec 24, 2012 at 6:35 AM Post #932 of 37,648
Quote:
... as transport dx 100 or my iPhone 4 S can not compete again
AK 100.

Honest technical question: If you have an external DAC doing D/A conversion, would the transport have any impact on sound quality? I've often wondered that and I'm not sure if I'm overlooking anything, but I would have assumed that the transport is merely providing digital infomation to the DAC.
 
Dec 24, 2012 at 7:44 AM Post #934 of 37,648
Quote:
... as transport dx 100 or my iPhone 4 S can not compete again
AK 100.

Honest technical question: If you have an external DAC doing D/A conversion, would the transport have any impact on sound quality? I've often wondered that and I'm not sure if I'm overlooking anything, but I would have assumed that the transport is merely providing digital infomation to the DAC.

Believe it or not, it is somehow possible. It depends on the interface between the transport & the DAC source.

I'm on my iPhone Tapatalk now but if you guys search for Shigzeo's review of the early Go-DAP 4.0 with firmware 1.04, you'll notice he did measurements of (something, can't remember what now) vs the CLAS as transports out to external DAC.

The very same iDevice, depending on whether it's using the Go-DAP or CLAS, outputting to an external DAC/Amp sounded quite different. The Go-DAP sounded quite dull. VentureCraft issued a firmware update v2.0 to improve the situation & did a commendable job but still couldn't match the CLAS.
 
Dec 24, 2012 at 7:45 AM Post #935 of 37,648
  1. [img]http://cdn.head-fi.org/1/1f/100x100px-LS-1f66d77c_cuteness2.jpeg[/img]
  1. lee730
  2. badge_headphoneusSupremus.v1305918899.png
  3.  
  4. offline
  1. 9,839 Posts. Joined 1/2011
  2. Location: Hawaii



  1. [img]http://cdn.head-fi.org/d/d0/100x100px-LS-d081e5c6_dkopfb.jpg[/img]
  1. sepinho
  2. badge_100.v1305918899.png
  3.  
  4. online
  1. 437 Posts. Joined 4/2010
  2. Location: Berlin, Germany



Honest technical question: If you have an external DAC doing D/A conversion, would the transport have any impact on sound quality? I've often wondered that and I'm not sure if I'm overlooking anything, but I would have assumed that the transport is merely providing digital infomation to the DAC.


 






 
Anybody can help?
posted  :
http://www.head-fi.org/t/633511/pictures-of-your-portable-rig-part-xvi/930#post_8985711


It sure can. If the timing is off it can lead to sound degradation (jitter).




 
Dec 24, 2012 at 7:49 AM Post #936 of 37,648
Here's Shigzeo's link on it with graphs, etc

http://www.touchmyapps.com/2012/05/18/cypher-labs-algorhythm-solo-vs-venturecraft-go-dap-unit-4-0-digital-output/
 
Dec 24, 2012 at 7:52 AM Post #937 of 37,648
Quote:
Here's Shigzeo's link on it with graphs, etc
http://www.touchmyapps.com/2012/05/18/cypher-labs-algorhythm-solo-vs-venturecraft-go-dap-unit-4-0-digital-output/

Thank you AnakChan (it will take me sometime to process all the info in the above link), but what is your personal take on this?
 
Dec 24, 2012 at 8:16 AM Post #938 of 37,648
  1. [img]http://cdn.head-fi.org/9/93/100x100px-LS-9329466e_cat.jpg[/img]
  1. DanBa
  2. badge_500.v1305918899.png
  3.  
  4. online
  1. 592 Posts. Joined 11/2009



Quote:
Honest technical question: If you have an external DAC doing D/A conversion, would the transport have any impact on sound quality? I've often wondered that and I'm not sure if I'm overlooking anything, but I would have assumed that the transport is merely providing digital infomation to the DAC.

 
 
Amarra / Audirvana users would state that a Mac OS X-powered device using Amarra / Audirvana will deliver a cleaner PCM audio stream than the stock software.
http://www.audiostream.com/content/media-player-qa-q6-it-more-beneficial-handle-upsampling-media-player-or-dac
http://www.amr-audio.co.uk/large_image/MAC%20OSX%20audio%20players%20&%20Integer%20Mode.pdf
 
"Modification philosophy":
http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/touch-toolbox-30.html




 
Dec 24, 2012 at 8:55 AM Post #939 of 37,648
Quote:
Thank you AnakChan (it will take me sometime to process all the info in the above link), but what is your personal take on this?

 
I've personally heard the Go-DAP at fw 1.04 and fw 2.0 and even noted in my review (at 1.04) that it sounded flat :-

http://www.head-fi.org/products/venturecraft-go-dap-4-0/reviews/6781
 
All I can say is that I heard a difference between the Go-DAP and the CLAS but as you probably know me, my audio techie skills are still in its infancy so I couldn't explain why I was hearing the difference. Shigzeo helped in educating me in that. But note that I'm hearing 2 explanations :-
 
1) jitter (which you just gave)
2) Go-DAP's awkward 44.1kHz -> 48kHz upsampling (from VentureCraft themselves)
 
fw 2.0 doesn't fix the constant upsampling but somehow "works around" the flat/dull sound.
 
 
  1. [img]http://cdn.head-fi.org/9/93/100x100px-LS-9329466e_cat.jpg[/img]
  1. DanBa
  2. badge_500.v1305918899.png
  3.  
  4. online
  1. 592 Posts. Joined 11/2009



 
 
Amarra / Audirvana users would state that a Mac OS X-powered device using Amarra / Audirvana will deliver a cleaner PCM audio stream than the stock software.
http://www.audiostream.com/content/media-player-qa-q6-it-more-beneficial-handle-upsampling-media-player-or-dac
http://www.amr-audio.co.uk/large_image/MAC%20OSX%20audio%20players%20&%20Integer%20Mode.pdf
 
"Modification philosophy":
http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/touch-toolbox-30.html
 



 
I can tell you I've heard the difference between iTunes & Audirvana+ too for the very same track file. Again, I can't explain but can just say I've heard the difference. A+ is now my default player (but integrated to iTunes).
 
Anyhow, kinda drifting away from the pictures thread. Feel free to PM me or redirect me to another thread about this conversation. Though OT here, it's nevertheless interesting.
 
Dec 24, 2012 at 9:15 AM Post #940 of 37,648
kind of pic of my transportable rig - or at least the player 
wink_face.gif

 
 
 

 
Dec 24, 2012 at 4:13 PM Post #943 of 37,648
 and 
 
Dec 24, 2012 at 4:19 PM Post #944 of 37,648
Quote:
It's designed to be like that so it'll be fine. Sysconcept make some of the best optical cables around but make absolutely certain that your communication is 110% accurat as they will not admit to any mistake

 
It's designed to handle that much tension? (look at the photo). How about the jacks on the player/amp? Seems like one that's half an inch longer would be perfect.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top