sfwalcer
Master Troll
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2012
- Posts
- 6,786
- Likes
- 314
A little update on the corecool v2s. After a full night of burn-in on 90% volume on my ipods, these are not hard to drive at all compared to the FXZ200s so i didn't max out the volume. Anywho, the mids is still sound a bit recessed and the highs seems to have regressed, Treble on open box seemed slightly more extended, but now has mellowed out too much for my liking. They still sound amazingly transparent for a bass centric iem but it sounds kinda hollow in it's overall presentation. The mid bass on these are also more pronounced than the FXZ200s, therefore overall the FXZ200s have a more balanced and natural refined sound compared to the corecool v2s.
As of now they are not close to the level of the gr07 BEs for me, though they sound very similar the FXZ200s they are not as technical capable nor is as refined. This could all change with more burn in though, but these might be the 1st set of iems that COULD respond negatively to burn-in. LoL Will see........
As of now they are not close to the level of the gr07 BEs for me, though they sound very similar the FXZ200s they are not as technical capable nor is as refined. This could all change with more burn in though, but these might be the 1st set of iems that COULD respond negatively to burn-in. LoL Will see........