ZU cable for HD 600/650 First Impressions
Oct 6, 2003 at 1:12 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 9

Sugano-san

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
May 19, 2003
Posts
1,153
Likes
12
The following is an updated and revised version of a more casual review that I posted elsewhere in this forum.


I did a comparison between 3m (10 ft.) runs of the new ZU Mobius and my Cardas aftermarket cable after burning in the Mobius for about 30 hrs. with various types of music. Amplifiers used were the Earmax Pro, the RA-1 (also for RS-1 comparison), and a well-maintained X-Can v2 w/ X-PSU and NOS tubes.

Executive Summary: The Mobius has more of everything, but most of all it lends to the HD 600 that crisp and immediate feel that many were missing (that effect was sometimes referred to as the "veil").

If you imagine several layers of thin "veils" instead of one thick one, the best metaphor would be that a considerable number of layers are removed by the Mobius. This can be easily detected when listening at very low volume. The amount of detail that the Mobius retains in comparison to the Cardas is surprising. It's a bit like the feeling when you first notice how much better high-quality vinyl reproduction is compared to CD.

When listening at high volume you have the feeling you can hear everything -- minute details, breaths, the sound of the strings of a double bass on the fingerboard, creaking from the chairs of the players in the orchestra, different shades of percussion instruments -- the HD 600 together with this cable gives you a very intense feeling of "being there".

Among other things, I listened to a "private" recording of an orchestra at the rehearsal, and the sheer sense of "room" that I suddenly experienced in the split second before the orchestra started playing and the players were inhaling at the same time was simply stunning.

At "normal" listening volume, the amount of treble, presence and brilliance that comes through taken together with the deep and clearly defined bass and the extremely informative midrange allows you to considerably reduce the overall listening volume. The subliminal urge to turn louder in order to detect more detail that I sometimes felt with the Cardas and certainly with the stock cable is gone. You can actually listen at lower volume and still get more satisfaction out of it. Listening fatigue bye-bye.

The stunning thing about the crisp sound of the Mobius is how "real" and up close the midrange sounds. Voices (male and female), saxophones, guitars, everything is so much more informative and -- with the right amp -- magic (see below). Even Patricia Barber's voice suddenly and unexpectedly sounds really sexy - who would have thought that?

The company's website says that the Mobius is supposed to sound better than any other cable right out of the box and that during the first 24 hrs. it may sound a little grainy. Both claims are justified in my view. By now the grain is mostly gone, and the distance between the Mobius and the Cardas keeps increasing (according to the info on the ZU website the complete burn-in process takes approx. 250 hrs.).

The best amp for the HD 600/Mobius combo of the three mentioned above is the Earmax Pro. The combo also sounds nice with the other two amps, but the HD 600/Mobius/Earmax Pro combination has it all. It is so charming, sweet and seductive yet at the same time dynamic and detailed (thanks to the cable's virtues described above) that the sound enchants your ears like a 1945 Bordeaux would enchant your palate, if you'd be able to get a hold of a bottle.

How does the HD 600/Mobius/Earmax Pro combo compare to the RS-1/RA-1? It's clearly better in all material respects. And I do mean all material respects. As this is a matter of personal taste I am not going to go into any more detail.

Do I recommend the Mobius to the owner of a HD 600 with a stock cable? Yes, and without reserve!

Do I recommend it to the owner of a Cardas cable? Yes, but with the reserve that the Cardas enjoys its good reputation for a reason, and although I did purchase the Mobius in addition to the Cardas, there may be convincing economic reasons not to do so. Until this past Friday I was always very happy with my Cardas.

Do I recommend the Mobius to someone who would like to squeeze the optimum out of his HD 600? Let me put it like this: I am currently not aware of a better cable for these headphones.

I am anxious to hear how a well-burned in HD 650 fares with that cable, but at this point it is hard for me to imagine that the HD 650's stock cable will be considerably better than the Mobius.

To be continued...

Thank you very much for your interest.
 
Oct 6, 2003 at 6:26 PM Post #2 of 9
I was hoping you'd say that it sounded horrible.
You might have just cost me $205.
I'll half the cost with you, to be fair...

Thanks for the review.
I'm eager to read what others think about it.
 
Oct 6, 2003 at 8:01 PM Post #3 of 9
Thank you for the most imformative review of the Zu Mobius cable, Sugano-san. Extremely helpfull for me, and the clincher in making my decision between Cardas, Equinox, and the Mobius as my HD600 stock replacement.

I ordered my Mobius from Adam today, and am very much looking forward to hearing it in my own environment. You are definitely a tube guy, judging from your equipment lineup, while I am SS - META42 Home, Meier Prehead, and a JMT PPA in the works - so it will be interesting to see my perceptions. I will be going directly from the stock senn cable to the Mobius.

Stay tuned ...
 
Oct 7, 2003 at 12:06 AM Post #5 of 9
Quote:

Originally posted by arrowmark
Anybody compare the Mobius to the Equinox?


Equinox HD 600 cable has been ordered, but with 4-pin XLR connector, so I won't be able to use the same amps for purposes of comparison. Will post something meaningful at a later point, if at all possible.
 
Oct 20, 2003 at 1:53 PM Post #7 of 9
The Zu's have burned for 60hours now.
I upgraded from stock - so cant compare with Cardas, etc.
Straight out the bag there was alot more detail, more solidity, but slightly cold and restrained, but not edgy like some silver I've heard.
Now, the Zu's have taken my system up to another strata. I am hearing details off my CDs I didnt know were there. The dynamics are explosive. The top end is excellent - cybals shimmer. The bass is clean, solid and fast. Separation is excellent. With the cable, I cant say the Hd600s are laid-back anymore - they dont overdo either, they are just toe tapping headnodding involving.
Thanks for the recommendation.
 
Oct 20, 2003 at 2:04 PM Post #8 of 9
Quote:

Originally posted by goon-heaven
The dynamics are explosive. The top end is excellent - cymbals shimmer. The bass is clean, solid and fast. Separation is excellent. With the cable, I cant say the Hd600s are laid-back anymore - they dont overdo either, they are just toe tapping headnodding involving.
Thanks for the recommendation.


You're most welcome. This is one great cable, isn't it?!?

After 250+ hrs. of play, my cable has developed a wonderfully liquid, transparent and airy quality, and I would no longer use the word "crisp" (as in "crispy bacon") to describe the sound. It's got a never-ending top end, yet it lacks any grain or harshness -- a huge difference in sound quality compared to any other wire I am aware of. The sound is up-close but never obtrusive; it's simply "there". I'll post some more detailed impressions soon.

edit: typos etc.
 
Oct 20, 2003 at 3:01 PM Post #9 of 9
I guess I missed out on that "crisp" feeling. Totally agree though on fluidity and air. My hearing aint as good as it woz - tails off around 13k. But with these cables I'd swear I'm hearing 16k and beyond.

I look forward to your update.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top