otherlives
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2012
- Posts
- 86
- Likes
- 14
since its 'help a noob decide on heaphones v.18743298742937424.4"
I have been researching these damn things for about 20 straight hours now, went and listened to some, and its time to ask some questions and then buy something. So bear with me. I will try to lay this thread out as logical as possible.
I listen to a broad range of things, mostly indie music of one genre or another. TBH I have no idea what the hell the sub-categories of this music even means half the time, so I'd prefer not to list any of it. I will listen to everything from hip-hop to rock to electronic, but nothing too heavy in any direction. Some examples would be: The Weeknd, Outkast, Sbtrkt, Frank Ocean, Doom, JJn2, LCD Soundsystem, stuff like that. But 70% of my listening is indie rock, such as: Beach House, The Antlers, Arcade Fire, Local Natives, MGMT, Vampire Weekend. Hope this gives an idea.
It would be great to stay between 150-250 for these headphones. I will buy used or new. My objective is comfortable, circumaural headphones I can wear for 6 hrs at a time during the day. They will be used for music only.
Here is what I have heard recently, and my thoughts:
HD650; powered by a E11 from an ipod, v0, probably vbr or 320kbs: These were the best things I heard by far. I heard these first, then the other ones a day later. It convinced me I want open back headphones (after hearing the options below and how expansive the soundstage of these were in comparison). Obviously they should be, as they are the most expensive. They were fairly full, and I didnt think they were lacking bass at all. I thought they could have been a little more open, and I would have appreciated a little more transparency. I assume some of this would have come from a better amp. The soundstage was impressive to me, as I had never heard this nice of a headphone. That being said I got used to it pretty quickly and started picking out issues. I am not sure I would have been so impressed with the soundstage after a week of listening. Maybe I would be, but thats sorta my hunch. Overall I am very impressed though.
DT770 Pros (I assume 80's); unpowered, from a iMac, lossless; I didnt really like these. They sounded incredible when I put on MSTRKRFT and Crystal Castles, but the mids were really muddy. Tom Petty's vocals sounded horrible. I can see why people that listen to electronic and really like bass love these things. I can only imagine its even stronger when properly powered. I could never imagine owning these.
HD328's; same as above: Meh. I tried them after the DT770's and I dont remember thinking anything good or bad about them verses the DT770's. I was unimpressed. If someone put a gun to my head I would have taken the DT770's just because at least they excelled at one type of sound. I wouldn't buy these.
ATH-M50; same as above: Not bad Better than the DT770's. I thought that the mids were much more responsive and lively. However the soundstage was unimpressive. I remember the bass was fine, the mids were ok, and the highs were ok, but everything in between was muddy or opaque, I'm not sure which. Its like they accentuated 3 parts of the EQ and left the rest to die. I can see why people like these for the money, especially if they arent very discerning. They certainly sounded ok.
So I know I most likely cannot get a pair of headphones that is good for *all* the music I listen to, but I would like them to be ok at least. I would also like them to display a soundstage and signature that I prefer, even though I am not 100% sure that that is, I think I have a good idea and hopefully the info above gives a decent idea. I am currently leaning towards a K/Q/701. I *think* I am looking for something like the HD650's that might be a little less forward and possibly more transparent, and they sound like the fit the bill. I have also read good things about the AD900's/700's and the DT880's, but I am worried about them being too much like the 770's. I think the HD600's and 650's are out of my price range. My worry with the K701's is that they wont keep up with the music I listen to. It seems a lot of people that love them listen to classical music. Theres a ton of debate around here regarding tech stuff, but very little cemented in the type of music you listen to. Sorta perplexing to me. I will power these with something adequate... probably a M Stage/matrix cube or something similar at my desk. I cant find a reasonably priced dac+amp that seems sufficient to power the headphones I am looking at that will hook to my ipod, so maybe just an E11 for that? I am not sure. I am also open to recommendations of headphones not recommended in this paragraph.
TLDR: Read what music I like and recommend me a pair of headphones that is a little more open and transparent than the HD650's.
I have been researching these damn things for about 20 straight hours now, went and listened to some, and its time to ask some questions and then buy something. So bear with me. I will try to lay this thread out as logical as possible.
I listen to a broad range of things, mostly indie music of one genre or another. TBH I have no idea what the hell the sub-categories of this music even means half the time, so I'd prefer not to list any of it. I will listen to everything from hip-hop to rock to electronic, but nothing too heavy in any direction. Some examples would be: The Weeknd, Outkast, Sbtrkt, Frank Ocean, Doom, JJn2, LCD Soundsystem, stuff like that. But 70% of my listening is indie rock, such as: Beach House, The Antlers, Arcade Fire, Local Natives, MGMT, Vampire Weekend. Hope this gives an idea.
It would be great to stay between 150-250 for these headphones. I will buy used or new. My objective is comfortable, circumaural headphones I can wear for 6 hrs at a time during the day. They will be used for music only.
Here is what I have heard recently, and my thoughts:
HD650; powered by a E11 from an ipod, v0, probably vbr or 320kbs: These were the best things I heard by far. I heard these first, then the other ones a day later. It convinced me I want open back headphones (after hearing the options below and how expansive the soundstage of these were in comparison). Obviously they should be, as they are the most expensive. They were fairly full, and I didnt think they were lacking bass at all. I thought they could have been a little more open, and I would have appreciated a little more transparency. I assume some of this would have come from a better amp. The soundstage was impressive to me, as I had never heard this nice of a headphone. That being said I got used to it pretty quickly and started picking out issues. I am not sure I would have been so impressed with the soundstage after a week of listening. Maybe I would be, but thats sorta my hunch. Overall I am very impressed though.
DT770 Pros (I assume 80's); unpowered, from a iMac, lossless; I didnt really like these. They sounded incredible when I put on MSTRKRFT and Crystal Castles, but the mids were really muddy. Tom Petty's vocals sounded horrible. I can see why people that listen to electronic and really like bass love these things. I can only imagine its even stronger when properly powered. I could never imagine owning these.
HD328's; same as above: Meh. I tried them after the DT770's and I dont remember thinking anything good or bad about them verses the DT770's. I was unimpressed. If someone put a gun to my head I would have taken the DT770's just because at least they excelled at one type of sound. I wouldn't buy these.
ATH-M50; same as above: Not bad Better than the DT770's. I thought that the mids were much more responsive and lively. However the soundstage was unimpressive. I remember the bass was fine, the mids were ok, and the highs were ok, but everything in between was muddy or opaque, I'm not sure which. Its like they accentuated 3 parts of the EQ and left the rest to die. I can see why people like these for the money, especially if they arent very discerning. They certainly sounded ok.
So I know I most likely cannot get a pair of headphones that is good for *all* the music I listen to, but I would like them to be ok at least. I would also like them to display a soundstage and signature that I prefer, even though I am not 100% sure that that is, I think I have a good idea and hopefully the info above gives a decent idea. I am currently leaning towards a K/Q/701. I *think* I am looking for something like the HD650's that might be a little less forward and possibly more transparent, and they sound like the fit the bill. I have also read good things about the AD900's/700's and the DT880's, but I am worried about them being too much like the 770's. I think the HD600's and 650's are out of my price range. My worry with the K701's is that they wont keep up with the music I listen to. It seems a lot of people that love them listen to classical music. Theres a ton of debate around here regarding tech stuff, but very little cemented in the type of music you listen to. Sorta perplexing to me. I will power these with something adequate... probably a M Stage/matrix cube or something similar at my desk. I cant find a reasonably priced dac+amp that seems sufficient to power the headphones I am looking at that will hook to my ipod, so maybe just an E11 for that? I am not sure. I am also open to recommendations of headphones not recommended in this paragraph.
TLDR: Read what music I like and recommend me a pair of headphones that is a little more open and transparent than the HD650's.