1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

www.burzynskimovie.com Everyone who knows someone with cancer or has cancer must see this!! No ifs, ands or buts.

  1. IPodPJ
    Everyone who knows someone with cancer or has cancer must see this!!  No ifs, ands or buts.
    This is the most important documentary you will ever have seen.
    Watch the full movie here on YouTube for free:
    From the website:
    Burzynski, the Movie is the story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history.
    His victorious battles with the United States government were centered around Dr. Burzynski's gene-targeted cancer medicines he discovered in the 1970's called Antineoplastons, which have currently completed Phase II FDA-supervised clinical trials in 2009 and could begin the final phase of FDA testing in 2011–barring the ability to raise the required $300 million to fund the final phase of FDA clinical trials.

    When Antineoplastons are approved, it will mark the first time in history a single scientist, not a pharmaceutical company, will hold the exclusive patent and distribution rights on a paradigm-shifting medical breakthrough.

    Antineoplastons are responsible for curing some of the most incurable forms of terminal cancer. Various cancer survivors are presented in the film who chose these medicines instead of surgery, chemotherapy or radiation - with full disclosure of medical records to support their diagnosis and recovery - as well as systematic (non-anecdotal) FDA-supervised clinical trial data comparing Antineoplastons to other available treatments—which is published within the peer-reviewed medical literature.

    One form of cancer - diffuse, intrinsic, childhood brainstem glioma has never before been cured in any scientifically controlled clinical trial in the history of medicine. Antineoplastons hold the first cures in history - dozens of them. [ANP - PubMed 2003] [ANP - PubMed 2006] [Rad & other - PubMed 2008] [Chemo/Rad - PubMed 2005]

    This documentary takes the audience through the treacherous, yet victorious, 14-year journey both Dr. Burzynski and his patients have had to endure in order to obtain FDA-approved clinical trials of Antineoplastons.

    Dr. Burzynski resides and practices medicine in Houston, Texas. He was able to initially produce and administer his discovery without FDA-approval from 1977-1995 because the state of Texas at this time did not require that Texas physicians be required to adhere to Federal law in this situation. This law has since been changed.

    As with anything that changes current-day paradigms, Burzynski's ability to successfully treat incurable cancer with such consistency has baffled the industry. Ironically, this fact had prompted numerous investigations by the Texas Medical Board, who relentlessly took Dr. Burzynski as high as the state supreme court in their failed attempt to halt his practices.

    Likewise, the Food and Drug Administration engaged in four Federal Grand Juries spanning over a decade attempting to indict Dr. Burzynski, all of which ended in no finding of fault on his behalf. Finally, Dr. Burzynski was indicted in their 5th Grand Jury in 1995, resulting in two federal trials and two sets of jurors finding him not guilty of any wrongdoing. If convicted, Dr. Burzynski would have faced a maximum of 290 years in a federal prison and $18.5 million in fines.

    However, what was revealed a few years after Dr. Burzynski won his freedom, helps to paint a more coherent picture regarding the true motivation of the United States government's relentless persecution of Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D.

    Note: When Antineoplastons are approved for public use, it will allow a single scientist to hold an exclusive right to manufacture and sell these medicines on the open market—leaving the pharmaceutical industry absent in profiting from the most effective gene-targeted cancer treatment the world has ever seen.
  2. wink
    This is good news.
    The large pharmaceutical companies don't like cures.
    The like to manage your disease as they do a better job of cleaning out your wallet than Head-Fi does.
    The prescription residuals are mind-boggling.
    Also, Big Pharma can afford fund universities to research their projects to the point that uni's can't do much real research on what they want because:-
    1. There's no research money in it.
    2. It would upset their bill payers (Big Pharma) if they were doing research that would kill their cash cow.
    It was on the news about six months go that a uni researcher sat on a cure for cancer for almost 25 years because he could not synthesize the active ingredient which is patentable if synthetic.
    You do the will of who pays the bill.
  3. Czilla9000 Contributor
    This Mom blogger subjected her daughter to Burzynski's  -
    ...and she died anyway.
    Not saying there is nothing to it, but I think the conspiracy theory is far fetched. Assuming it really is a cure, opposition is likely sincere in motive: "Never attribute to malice what can be explained by ignorance."
    The cop's testimony at the beginning was touching, however.
  4. IPodPJ


    He never claimed it to be a cure for 100% of people, yet.  It cures between 25% - 50% of people treated.  He has been improving the methods for decades.  It is a non-toxic treatment which has a much, much higher rate of success than conventional, toxic chemotherapy.  If you watched the movie, you know what's going on because everything presented was fact, not a conspiracy.  The FDA is one of the most corrupt institutions within the government.
  5. nick_charles Contributor
  6. IPodPJ
    Did you even watch the movie or are you just posting nonsense that the NCI and FDA are pumping out?  If you watch the movie you'll see all the facts for yourself.
    The NCI purposely let people die by not following his protocols and giving them much lower doses than they were supposed to receive and you'll find out exactly why if you watch it.
    I hate when people try to make claims of quackery before even reviewing all the evidence.
  7. wink
    There was a trial done on the efficacy of vitamin C which went against Linus Pauling's research.
    It was found out later that the people doing the research were putting around 30mG of vitamin C in the pills which is the dose to prevent scurvy.
    It is not enough to prevent vitamin C deficiency.
    It was later found that there was half a dose of the agent (vitaminC) in the placebo.
    Naturally, the result was that even though those on the vitamin C pills showed some improvement, there was not enough statistical improvement to those on the placebo to warrant a confirmation.
    You need approx 12 to 16 grams of vitamin C to really help, and then taper off the dose at about 1 gram a day until you reach nil or a maintenance dose.
  8. IPodPJ

    ......and that's exactly what happened with the NCI trials, which Nick would know and wouldn't have posted what he did had he watched it. :)
  9. metreonfuture




    you do realize that one of the NCI scientists actually came out and said they rigged the study to fail because they couldn't patent it, right?
  10. IPodPJ
    Not only that, the woman who worked for Burzynski tried to steal molecules used in the antineoplastins and went to work for Elan pharmaceuticals, where, they were granted a patent by the U.S. government on molecules already patented by Burzynski.  It's the largest FDA/Pharma case of fraud to this day as far as I'm aware.  The FDA is more or less owned by the pharmaceutical industry.  I thought what went on between the FDA and Monsanto was bad, but this goes way beyond that.
  11. wink
    It's funny how conspiracies are recorded throughout history, but the modern conspiracies are only theory....
    As someone once said "I may be paranoid, but that doesn't mean that they're not out to get me".
  12. IPodPJ


    Well, there are a ton of conspiracies that are B.S.  The difference here and why this documentary is so well done is that every single thing presented in there is factual and has all the documented evidence to back it up.  None of it is hearsay.
  13. metreonfuture
    and he has a whistle blower to back him up. plus the cure cases are not anecdotal.  they have happened and he has cured cancers that have been cured no other way.
  14. wink
    There is tons that are... trouble is there are a lot that aren't which get caught in the garbage flow.

Share This Page