[sithompson]

I'm not really into portable audio, but i do have a need for it (about 40 minutes a day) so I use my iPod Shuffle and Senn CX300 Mk2. I got these cheap and while they do an OK job I don't think they are up to much. So, are the CX500 worth spending over twice as much on? - or what are the alternatives around this price point? I don't get on with IEM's so I would like to stick to this kind of bud design. Music wise it is female vocals, light rock, alternative, acoustic.

I have iGrados as well but I've not had the courage to wear them walking to work - they are a bit too conspicuous

Thanks

 

[Halftrack]

I have the CX500 but not the 300-II. However, I'd say no - there's just too much bass for my liking.

 

[Helmore]

Just a small detail, but the CX300-II is an IEM. They just don't go very deep and that makes them bearable for those that do not like the more 'invasive' IEMs.

 

[sithompson]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helmore /img/forum/go_quote.gif Just a small detail, but the CX300-II is an IEM. They just don't go very deep and that makes them bearable for those that do not like the more 'invasive' IEMs.

Sorry, yes, now you come to mention it they are. It is the invasive IEM's are the problem to me (such as the Shure SE102's that I have).

 

[Helmore]

I guess we share the same problem

, although I'm not yet saying all 'invasive' IEMs will be uncomfortable. I have a Shure SE210 and I just can't keep it in my ear for more than 15-30 minutes. Besides, I don't really like the sound signature, it's a bit too thin.