Quote:
did it have bowls or flats - makes a big difference. of course, if the highs were that distasteful, then maybe would not persuade you. i assume also not vintage.
Quote:
i might actually prefer vintage RS1 to HP1000 (more musical, warmer and better texture) - but the latter is also very good.
Quote:
i agree about price. not wallet friendly. but putting that aside, it sounds like you think very high of them. the R10 just seems to be so perfect for classical music. if that is your genre of choice then, despite its cost, i could not imagine someone being dissatisfied with them.
Originally Posted by guzziguy /img/forum/go_quote.gif For me, it's Grado RS-1s. I heard jp#s' balanced pair out of his EC amp with 909's Reimyo as the source. The amp and Reimyo are top notch. I also know that jp#s loves his RS-1s. For me, the treble was ear piercing. It was like having needles being driven into my eardrums. However, it's just a matter of taste. |
did it have bowls or flats - makes a big difference. of course, if the highs were that distasteful, then maybe would not persuade you. i assume also not vintage.
Quote:
Now the Grado HP-2s are a different story. I heard jp#s' and fell in love with them. They're mine now! Thanks John.
|
i might actually prefer vintage RS1 to HP1000 (more musical, warmer and better texture) - but the latter is also very good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by catscratch /img/forum/go_quote.gif Not going to be a popular sentiment, but for me it has to be the R10. ... The R10 has a certain magic to its midrange, a stark realism of tone together with a very romantic liquid presentation, but for a headphone that sells over $4k I'd expect more. I'd say it performs at the $1k pricepoint. |
i agree about price. not wallet friendly. but putting that aside, it sounds like you think very high of them. the R10 just seems to be so perfect for classical music. if that is your genre of choice then, despite its cost, i could not imagine someone being dissatisfied with them.