iomusic
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2004
- Posts
- 76
- Likes
- 0
George, your review is informative and interesting! Great! I am looking forward to the Part II review...
Originally Posted by ldj325 /img/forum/go_quote.gif George, Besides a very nice , that's a nice looking studio you have. No way you got all that for $3,600. Is that a G5 on the floor? And a nice big monitor. I'm setting up a Pro Tools LE home studio. I wish my set up looked that nice and clean. Laurence |
Originally Posted by GreatDane /img/forum/go_quote.gif Yes! _______ Very good initial summary George. I have a few of the same components that you own...Woo Audio 3 (well, close anyway)...Central Station, PA2v2, HD 650 , ER4P. You mention using max. volume with the 650, with my WA3, max. is quite loud, I often hit the wall at around 2 o'clock. My source is a Pioneer Elite DV-45A (universal player). For Redbook CD I use a digital connection into the CS using its DAC. I do have 2 other components in between the CS & WA3 so that might be an issue with my resuts. I do agree that as the volume goes up, up ,up there is no loss in quality...it's very involving, a very addictive thing! The WA3 & WA6 are beautiful amps. I had many of the same emotions when listening to my WA3 for the first time. Easily worth the money. At the time my best can was the DT-880 which also sounds wonderful with tubes. I actually like the CS amp for its razor sharp detail, it is my favorite amp for my DT-770 (Darth Beyers). For most music I do prefer tubes with my 880 or 650. ------------I look forward to more impressions----------------- yeah baby! |
Originally Posted by trose49 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Where did you get the cover for the Woo OR DOES IT COME WITH THAT MESH COVER? |
Originally Posted by watchluvr4ever /img/forum/go_quote.gif polishpower, I personally like my CE595 and even though it isn't as good as the Marantz I believe its performance is way beyond its price point and it is a bargain even at full retail. When you get your CE595 give it some time for proper burn-in before you make any judgements about it. The sound of my unit changed dramatically after 200 hours of burn-in playing both redbook and SACD's. Out of the player I'm currently using my AKG K701's with my Headfive amp and BJC LC-1 interconnects. I just ordered a Woo 6 and there is a three week wait for mine. I will give my impressions when it arrives. Sorry for the rant. |
Originally Posted by George Chronis /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'll have to agree with watchluvr4ever. You can definitely tell the difference between the Marantz and the CE595, but the CE595 is a better bang for the buck than the Marantz. A lot of the members here would shoot me now, and they would say that the difference is tremendous (and a few more adjectives). I'm new to this hobby, and the differences seem subtle to me. I can tell the difference, but I'm not unhappy listening to the CE595. And the CE595 has a much louder signal than the Marantz. Probably +2db. The Woo6 works great with the K701. For rock, it actually pairs better with the K701 than the HD650 (I think). I find myself plugging the K701 into the Woo6 more often than the HD650, and the K701 are not as burnt in as the HD650. For Jazz and Classical I still use the HD650, but you'll like the K701. Hope this helps. |