exander
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2004
- Posts
- 128
- Likes
- 19
I've been reading a lot of posts about how great the sound is on Foobar. Is there really a noticeable difference between Winamp and Foobar?
Originally Posted by exander I've been reading a lot of posts about how great the sound is on Foobar. Is there really a noticeable difference between Winamp and Foobar? |
Originally Posted by Drakemoor I honestly can't hear any difference when using Foobar and i can't hear any difference with kernal streaming. |
never sound better than a FLAC on winamp with no plugins/equalizer |
Originally Posted by ATAT The sound quality increase that people seem to get in foobar is mostly placebo.. not much real audio difference. THIS however, does not mean that foobar is not a more preferrable player (to me it is).. my setup for foobar simply is amazing for what i want it to do , quick searching for my albums, ratings, all my data in a nice database to call, freedb for when i rip to flac... pretty much everything i want or need is in foobar (or 3rd party modules) .. its always nice to flip on the simple surround on my e2cs (those beatles tracks ... ). In the end foobar rocks not because the sound is "better" but because you get what you want, and nothing else, pretty much everything is removable / installable. want to remove the artist name? go ahead, you can... for me when sound quality is the same.. customizability outweighed any other considerations w00t |
Originally Posted by Drakemoor I've been using Foobar for a while now and i used a bootable linux CD and used some generic media player for about half an hour and for some strange reason it sounded better, even though i knew in my head that it wasn't possible. |