Winamp+ASIO4ALL vs Foobar+ASIO4ALL
Apr 23, 2009 at 5:47 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 8

olblueyez

Banned
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Posts
5,339
Likes
16
I was bored and I decided to give Winamp a try and it only outputs to one device at a time using ASIO4ALL but it sure is nice to be able to skin it. I also think I am hearing more detail but dont you know my amp has been on all day so Im not sure what to think. Any thoughts or feed back on what you use and why?

EDIT: After having some time to compare I still like the way Foobar sounds and I also like the interface better. Winamp is gone from my system. Even without customizing Foobar is laid out better and foobar also seems to use less resources as apposed to winamp.
 
May 4, 2009 at 11:22 PM Post #4 of 8
Foobar + Creative ASIO
 
May 5, 2009 at 10:21 AM Post #5 of 8
Foobar + Kernel Streaming.
smily_headphones1.gif
 
May 6, 2009 at 3:19 AM Post #6 of 8
i use foobar + ASIO4ALL only during late night/isolated listening sessions

otherwise i just stick with directsound
 
May 6, 2009 at 4:09 AM Post #7 of 8
I prefer foobar+ASIO4ALL. SQ-wise, they're very similar, but PSS/ELP/PUI makes foobar better than any other audio players for me.
 
May 6, 2009 at 4:33 PM Post #8 of 8
Foobar2000 + default driver
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top