thesuperguy
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
- Posts
- 120
- Likes
- 18
If both formats are lossless, what differentiates the 2 versions in terms of sound quality if at all?
That's just opinion,
I can hear the difference between 24/96 and 16/44 if the source is good enough.
I can't hear much difference between 24/96 and 24/192 if any
That's just opinion,
I can hear the difference between 24/96 and 16/44 if the source is good enough.
I can't hear much difference between 24/96 and 24/192 if any
If both formats are lossless, what differentiates the 2 versions in terms of sound quality if at all?
It's not opinion, it's basic digital audio theory.
44.1kHz can perfectly store frequencies up to 22.05kHz. Unless you're telling me you can hear higher than that then it shouldn't sound different. There are some other complexities like anti-aliasing filters but those changes shouldn't be audible.
Bit depth of 16 or 24 isn't going to make a difference when you're playing back recordings with a dynamic range of less than 20dB in 95% of music.
Are you saying there is no audible difference between a CD and a SACD version of the same album?
It's quite simple really, one is unneccesarily more expensive than the other.