lini
Thought the last line in Citizen Kane was nosebud.
Well, I just thought about something - one of my more serious thoughts concerning surround
- and I'd like to gather some more thoughts and opionions:
Of course, todays surround solutions being marketed as 3D sound is pure nonsense, because it's simply wrong: As mono translates to a single point, stereo doesn't deliver 2D, but 1D only - thus existing surround only translates into 2D, because it gives us a horizontal sound-plane.
But why is there no real 3D sound, yet? I mean, there is 7.1 surround, now (which might as well be represented by an 8.2 or even more complex speaker configuration). But wouldn't 8.0 surround (e.g. with a bookshelf size speaker in each corner of the room) be more attractive, because it could deliver real 3D sound? Of course, there is one drawback: Calibrating the speakers for 3D sound would be even more difficult to achieve with more than one listener. Nevertheless, it should work for one or two people even in a small room. Compatibility to stereo could also be an issue... So what do you think: Is there an evolutionary reason behind this? Or will companies wait to introduce 3D sound until we all have just upgraded (or additionally bought) at least to a 5.1 solution? I'm not sure, but during the last years I've developed a deep mistrust in the CE-industry... <sigh>
Greetings from Munich!
Manfred / Lini
Of course, todays surround solutions being marketed as 3D sound is pure nonsense, because it's simply wrong: As mono translates to a single point, stereo doesn't deliver 2D, but 1D only - thus existing surround only translates into 2D, because it gives us a horizontal sound-plane.
But why is there no real 3D sound, yet? I mean, there is 7.1 surround, now (which might as well be represented by an 8.2 or even more complex speaker configuration). But wouldn't 8.0 surround (e.g. with a bookshelf size speaker in each corner of the room) be more attractive, because it could deliver real 3D sound? Of course, there is one drawback: Calibrating the speakers for 3D sound would be even more difficult to achieve with more than one listener. Nevertheless, it should work for one or two people even in a small room. Compatibility to stereo could also be an issue... So what do you think: Is there an evolutionary reason behind this? Or will companies wait to introduce 3D sound until we all have just upgraded (or additionally bought) at least to a 5.1 solution? I'm not sure, but during the last years I've developed a deep mistrust in the CE-industry... <sigh>
Greetings from Munich!
Manfred / Lini