milkpowder
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2005
- Posts
- 8,496
- Likes
- 21
I have a Storm running hybrid .151/5.0 firmware and it's really quite good. I will only recommend it to others if they are willing to play the lottery with build quality (my friend has had two exchanges, and is about to go for a third) and also don't mind messing around with firmware. I'm lucky to have gotten a good example first time. Right now, there are better running phones out there. It's really not a phone that you can pick up and use. It takes a while to get used to the clicky screen and unique interface but once you get passed the initial learning period, it is a fantastic phone. You'll find unhappy users with every phone, it just seems to me the Storm has more and that is RIM's fault because the firmware the phone was released with is pretty poor. Anyhow, I wouldn't get the Storm now, even if you can find a perfectly functioning handset. I would hold out and see what the second generation has to offer, as well as when they finally release version 5 firmware officially. As good as the current leaked firmware is, I still feel the Storm is in beta, albeit a fairly stable one. People who say this phone is garbage either hasn't used one properly (trying it at a shop does not count), or used one that has diseased firmware (ie firmware that shipped with the phone).
I also use an iPhone 3G and it's much less of a hassle. Works straight out of the box with no need for any tinkering with the firmware. It just feels more polished than the Storm from the very start. Now it doesn't do as much as the Storm (no multi-tasking for example) but it does what it can do with great efficiency. The 3G version definitely lags at times, but the 3G S should correct those issues. The Safari browser would be the main strength of the iPhone as it delivers full HTML with great speed and the touch input integration is well thought out. Then there is the amazing app store with apps that are actually well designed and run well on the phone. The BB App World is still in its infancy and only very recently have well-designed apps started to appear.
If I were to get a phone at this very moment, I would seriously consider the Blackberry Tour, or wait for the Onyx. The keyboards on those BBs are amazing and make typing a breeze. It takes a little bit of getting used to at the very beginning but once you do you'll literally be churning out essays in no time. If you don't really need 3G, then the Curve is really the phone to beat. It's slim, and perfectly designed for texting and emailing. The screen is wonderfully vibrant and sharp thanks to the high pixel density. I've said this before: If you don't mind carrying around two phones, I would recommend an iPhone 3G S for internet and a BB Curve 8900 for emails and texting. Both are very capable as media players/browsers. Another 8900-like phone is the Nokia E71. Ultra-classy-looking and very well conceived. Its interface is not quite as good as Blackberry's though.
The N97 really didn't impress. The S60 system is the most advanced I've used, but I feel it still has a way to go. For a premium phone, it deserves a flashier looking interface and the S60 system looks cheap. The screen is very nice though. Build quality is good, but it feels plasticky compared to some other phones. The same can be said of the 5800, with its slightly less sophisticated S60 OS, but any of the criticisms I have for the N97 cannot really be applied to the 5800 because it wasn't marketed as a top-of-the-line phone. The 5800 is a superb value and I like how it is so slim. Sure, I'm not crazy about the S60, but it is very functional and the occasional slow-downs are just about acceptable. I would take a 5800 over a N97 simply because it is going for very little at the moment (especially on contract but I guess that's not what you're after) and shares a lot with the N97. I have not used the internet browser extensively but I do prefer Opera Mini on the Storm and of course, the iPhone's Safari browser.
Not much experience with any of the newer LGs or Samsungs, but they seem to be churning out new phones every other month. Then there's Android and Windows Mobile. I've used Windows Mobile phones before and they have been lacklustre in terms of reliability/stability. The Touch HD is probably the one I would get if I had to get one. Re: Android, I'd wait a little longer for the platform to mature as it has so much potential. The current Android handsets look a little "stupid" (for lack of a better word), but beauty is in the eye of the beholder!
No idea about the Palm Pre because I haven't used one, ever. Very nice specifications and video reviews look awesome. It has a blazing fast processor (same as 3G S) so I would expect it to be similar to the Apple in terms of raw performance.
I also use an iPhone 3G and it's much less of a hassle. Works straight out of the box with no need for any tinkering with the firmware. It just feels more polished than the Storm from the very start. Now it doesn't do as much as the Storm (no multi-tasking for example) but it does what it can do with great efficiency. The 3G version definitely lags at times, but the 3G S should correct those issues. The Safari browser would be the main strength of the iPhone as it delivers full HTML with great speed and the touch input integration is well thought out. Then there is the amazing app store with apps that are actually well designed and run well on the phone. The BB App World is still in its infancy and only very recently have well-designed apps started to appear.
If I were to get a phone at this very moment, I would seriously consider the Blackberry Tour, or wait for the Onyx. The keyboards on those BBs are amazing and make typing a breeze. It takes a little bit of getting used to at the very beginning but once you do you'll literally be churning out essays in no time. If you don't really need 3G, then the Curve is really the phone to beat. It's slim, and perfectly designed for texting and emailing. The screen is wonderfully vibrant and sharp thanks to the high pixel density. I've said this before: If you don't mind carrying around two phones, I would recommend an iPhone 3G S for internet and a BB Curve 8900 for emails and texting. Both are very capable as media players/browsers. Another 8900-like phone is the Nokia E71. Ultra-classy-looking and very well conceived. Its interface is not quite as good as Blackberry's though.
The N97 really didn't impress. The S60 system is the most advanced I've used, but I feel it still has a way to go. For a premium phone, it deserves a flashier looking interface and the S60 system looks cheap. The screen is very nice though. Build quality is good, but it feels plasticky compared to some other phones. The same can be said of the 5800, with its slightly less sophisticated S60 OS, but any of the criticisms I have for the N97 cannot really be applied to the 5800 because it wasn't marketed as a top-of-the-line phone. The 5800 is a superb value and I like how it is so slim. Sure, I'm not crazy about the S60, but it is very functional and the occasional slow-downs are just about acceptable. I would take a 5800 over a N97 simply because it is going for very little at the moment (especially on contract but I guess that's not what you're after) and shares a lot with the N97. I have not used the internet browser extensively but I do prefer Opera Mini on the Storm and of course, the iPhone's Safari browser.
Not much experience with any of the newer LGs or Samsungs, but they seem to be churning out new phones every other month. Then there's Android and Windows Mobile. I've used Windows Mobile phones before and they have been lacklustre in terms of reliability/stability. The Touch HD is probably the one I would get if I had to get one. Re: Android, I'd wait a little longer for the platform to mature as it has so much potential. The current Android handsets look a little "stupid" (for lack of a better word), but beauty is in the eye of the beholder!
No idea about the Palm Pre because I haven't used one, ever. Very nice specifications and video reviews look awesome. It has a blazing fast processor (same as 3G S) so I would expect it to be similar to the Apple in terms of raw performance.