Which battery setup is more fesible
Aug 11, 2005 at 1:28 AM Post #2 of 15
Too many variables left unspecified. Some things for you to consider:

1. How hard will it be to get into the case? In the case of your 8x battery pack, this is likely to mean a case that is screwed shut, instead of having a battery door.

2. How likely are you to strip out the screw threads, if any? Batteries trapped in aluminum cases without brass thread inserts are a bad idea, IMHO.

3. How much supply current will your circuit take, and from that, how much run time will you get from either option?

4. Is money an issue? If so, given all of the above, how much are you willing to pay for the ability to put off battery changes longer?
 
Aug 11, 2005 at 2:22 PM Post #5 of 15
You're not supposed to connect NiMHs in parallel.
 
Aug 11, 2005 at 3:38 PM Post #8 of 15
u get a battery with a long life between charges
biggrin.gif
 
Aug 11, 2005 at 5:32 PM Post #10 of 15
Quote:

My oringal idea is to connect them in serial...


I was using such amp a year or so in dual +-5V. These were able to drive class ab output stage (irf510, 9510 around 20ma per channel) it seems forever. NiMH batteries now are very good, just stay away from the cheapest (silver ones from walmart as example). I believe they have too high internal resistance. Can't remember what exactly happened (oscillation?).
 
Aug 11, 2005 at 8:34 PM Post #11 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by tangent
You're not supposed to connect NiMHs in parallel.


Good to know... but why not?
 
Aug 11, 2005 at 9:27 PM Post #12 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kippei
It is a overkill for a 20000mAh capacity to power a max 30mA cmoy amp?


If you connect 8 2500 mAh 1.2v batteries in series you get 9.6v and 2500mAh, NOT 8x2500 (20,000mAh)

If you connected them in parallel (which it seems you shouldn't) then you'd get 1.2v and 20,000 mAh.

Unfortunatly it don't go both ways
 
Aug 11, 2005 at 10:11 PM Post #13 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by BlazerFRS
If you connect 8 2500 mAh 1.2v batteries in series you get 9.6v and 2500mAh, NOT 8x2500 (20,000mAh)

If you connected them in parallel (which it seems you shouldn't) then you'd get 1.2v and 20,000 mAh.

Unfortunatly it don't go both ways



Oooo i see.... i was wrong all the time
 
Aug 12, 2005 at 4:41 PM Post #14 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nospam
Good to know... but why not?


A couple of bad things can happen. If a cell becomes shorted, the neighboring cells can discharge through that low-impedance path, causing heat buildup and such. Another is cell reversal, where a cell goes through 0V, and flips its poles; havoc ensues.

These problems are a consequence of the low impedance of NiMH cells in general, and the fact that they are reused until damage occurs. Alkalines have higher minimum impedances, and they're only taken through one cycle, so there's far less chance of bad things happening.
 
Aug 12, 2005 at 10:42 PM Post #15 of 15
Thanks for the detailed and informative answer (as usual).

This does throw a wrench into my plans for the next Mint I'm planning to build, but I'll start a new thread about that, since I don't want to thread-crap here
tongue.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top