Beethovenian
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2004
- Posts
- 76
- Likes
- 0
I saw this thread on a minidisc forum and thought it was an interesting question. We all know the iPod has the best software/player integration, reportedly very good sound and an absurd amount of accessories. It now has even quite cheap versions (if they can be considered so). So for those who don't currently own an iPod, what is it that's preventing you from joining the cult?
My reasons:
- The crucial one: lack of gapless playback. I'll simply never buy a player that's uncapable of correctly playing an album.
- The very important one: size. The iPod is certainly not a brick, but it could be more pocketable. At least considering Sony has something like the NW-HD1.
- The important one: battery life. I could live with the 12 hours of the iPod, but obviously the more, the better.
- The "it makes a difference" one: interface. Granted, the iPod is easy to use. But Apple could make artist and album's names scroll through the screen when you're browsing your lists. Sometimes you need more than the information that fits the screen, especially when looking for classical music, when albums can have names like Piano Sonata Op. 10 No. 1 or Piano Sonata Op. 10 No. 2.
- The "it's not important but I'd consider" one: design. The iPod is reasonably cute, but it's getting old. A rejuvenation (and the addition of some colors) would be nice. (I'm talking here about 20GB-plus players. The mini looks very nice, but it's just too small in terms of capacity.)
I have to admit the iPod's absurd popularity could still be an obstacle, since I really don't like to feel like a lemming. But if those issues listed were addressed I wouldn't have any real reason to not buy one.
My reasons:
- The crucial one: lack of gapless playback. I'll simply never buy a player that's uncapable of correctly playing an album.
- The very important one: size. The iPod is certainly not a brick, but it could be more pocketable. At least considering Sony has something like the NW-HD1.
- The important one: battery life. I could live with the 12 hours of the iPod, but obviously the more, the better.
- The "it makes a difference" one: interface. Granted, the iPod is easy to use. But Apple could make artist and album's names scroll through the screen when you're browsing your lists. Sometimes you need more than the information that fits the screen, especially when looking for classical music, when albums can have names like Piano Sonata Op. 10 No. 1 or Piano Sonata Op. 10 No. 2.
- The "it's not important but I'd consider" one: design. The iPod is reasonably cute, but it's getting old. A rejuvenation (and the addition of some colors) would be nice. (I'm talking here about 20GB-plus players. The mini looks very nice, but it's just too small in terms of capacity.)
I have to admit the iPod's absurd popularity could still be an obstacle, since I really don't like to feel like a lemming. But if those issues listed were addressed I wouldn't have any real reason to not buy one.