kelly
Herr Babelfish der Übersetzer, he wore a whipped-cream-covered tutu for this title.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2002
- Posts
- 5,435
- Likes
- 12
I agree completely with tangent, but I'd still go with the source.
From what I've heard of modern (last 1-2 years) DVD players, the sound coming out of them is a lot better than the sound from my Sony S7000 DVD player from 1998 (their first and flagship model). The S7000 sounded, to me, equal to the $600 Sony ES and Marantz CD players of its day (keep in mind: the S7000 retailed for a lot more than $600).
To put this in persepctive, all of those $600 players from ~98 sound noticably better than the CT570--but the technology has moved quite a bit and I now believe you can spend $150 on a DVD player and get something even better--quite a bit better. Nick's Pioneer 440 is a good example of this. He typically uses it with an ART DI/O external DAC but I've had a couple of opportunities now to hear the player without the DAC and it's not bad at all, especially at that price.
The META42 will reveal more to you than the CHA47 will--for better or worse. The META will give you the air around instruments, the brush of fingers against strings--but how enjoyable is this with harsh treble and distorted sibilants? To me, not very. Overall, the trade off is still worth it for the META because everything improves. If you're stuck with a portable for other reasons, I'd still buy the META if I were you. But if you're planning to build a home system and you don't need the portability, buying the source first will probably make your upgrade path a bit more enjoyable.
And yeah, hey, having the ability to play DVDs isn't bad either.
From what I've heard of modern (last 1-2 years) DVD players, the sound coming out of them is a lot better than the sound from my Sony S7000 DVD player from 1998 (their first and flagship model). The S7000 sounded, to me, equal to the $600 Sony ES and Marantz CD players of its day (keep in mind: the S7000 retailed for a lot more than $600).
To put this in persepctive, all of those $600 players from ~98 sound noticably better than the CT570--but the technology has moved quite a bit and I now believe you can spend $150 on a DVD player and get something even better--quite a bit better. Nick's Pioneer 440 is a good example of this. He typically uses it with an ART DI/O external DAC but I've had a couple of opportunities now to hear the player without the DAC and it's not bad at all, especially at that price.
The META42 will reveal more to you than the CHA47 will--for better or worse. The META will give you the air around instruments, the brush of fingers against strings--but how enjoyable is this with harsh treble and distorted sibilants? To me, not very. Overall, the trade off is still worth it for the META because everything improves. If you're stuck with a portable for other reasons, I'd still buy the META if I were you. But if you're planning to build a home system and you don't need the portability, buying the source first will probably make your upgrade path a bit more enjoyable.
And yeah, hey, having the ability to play DVDs isn't bad either.