What software to use for playback? (Windows/PC)
Oct 23, 2011 at 2:55 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 69

evanwier

New Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
29
Likes
10
So... the Mac world is pretty set that if you want to spend the money, the best you can get is Amarra (more or less).   
 
What does the PC world have to offer that is similar?  I currently just use foobar, but I wonder if I am missing out on something....
 
Any way, let me know what's out there, or if stock foobar is the way to go!
 
 
Thanks
 
 
 
 
Oct 23, 2011 at 5:16 PM Post #4 of 69
For PC it's Foobar (which you already said you're using) and JRiver.  I wouldn't recommend any of the other current PC offerings.
 
I prefer Foobar but it's best suited for people comfortable with learning the ins and outs of the software, and spending time reading up on Hydrogen Audio.
 
Oct 24, 2011 at 3:44 AM Post #6 of 69


Quote:


Er. No. iTunes on Windows is junk. Horribly coded, junk. Foobar is solid. If you want all of the media management features JRiver is fine, but it adds nothing sonically. The new kid that I haven't yet tried is JPlay. I believe it costs $99, but there is a free trial. JPlay does a lot of stuff that Foobar can't match, but I think it's better suited for dedicated Windows based music servers rather than regular use PCs, as in order to get the maximum performance out of it, you can't actually use the computer for anything other than playback.
 
Oct 24, 2011 at 4:47 AM Post #7 of 69
Wow. Even by the standards of "magical" playback software, the JPlay site has incredibly flimsy justifications for it's features. Apparently, my PC will "lose the rhythm" with lesser playback software.
 
It's a healthy combination of what appears to be veiled references to jitter, which are just plain wrong, and claiming that I need to avoid all hard drive activity and minimise latency, which makes equally little sense. 
 
Oct 24, 2011 at 6:22 AM Post #8 of 69
I suggest a media player allowing you to bypass the Win mixer as it dithers the signal.
Players like Foobar, JRiver or MusicBee allows you to try drivers like WASAPI or ASIO (if your hardware supports it) or KS.
 
JRiver also have memory playback.
My suggestion would be to download the trial version of JRiver and fool around with the ‘audiophile’ options. Check if it does something in your system.
 
http://www.jriver.com/audiophile.html
 
 
Oct 24, 2011 at 12:56 PM Post #9 of 69


Quote:
I suggest a media player allowing you to bypass the Win mixer as it dithers the signal.
Players like Foobar, JRiver or MusicBee allows you to try drivers like WASAPI or ASIO (if your hardware supports it) or KS.
 
JRiver also have memory playback.
My suggestion would be to download the trial version of JRiver and fool around with the ‘audiophile’ options. Check if it does something in your system.
 
http://www.jriver.com/audiophile.html
 


All of the things listed Foobar does for free, other than maybe DSD streaming, I'm not sure about that one. To my ears, JRiver sounds audibly worse than Foobar, unless memory playback is enabled than it sounds roughly equal. The XXHighend player did not appear to live up to any of its claims. JPlay I don't know about, I haven't tried it yet, but there are good reasons for using RAM for playback rather than streaming from the hdd, and JPlay also claims to shut off many of Window's unneeded services which is also beneficial for sound quality.
 
Oct 24, 2011 at 1:52 PM Post #12 of 69
Some people believe that using up CPU processes negatively degrades audio playback.  They also believe any unnecessary access of the HDD or physical memory also negatively impacts SQ.
 
I've experienced skips on my PC (high-end specs), but aside from that, I don't notice any degradation of SQ.  While WASAPI playback, doing anything more than opening small applications and lightweight activities can cause skipping (I have run about 300ms as my buffer.  The skips are generally more frequent with closer to 1000ms buffer for my system).  DirectSound doesn't have this issue for me.
 
Oct 24, 2011 at 2:02 PM Post #13 of 69


Quote:
Can anyone explain this? If I have a PC with powerful enough CPU and enough RAM, how can some Windows' processes negatively affect the playback of music?
 


An ideal PC based music server would run just barely enough to control its playback software, which is what JPlay tries to do in its highest performance mode. The more things you ask it to do at the same time, like run hundreds of unnecessary Windows services, the more you degrade the performance. Chris from Computer Audiophile posted a list of what he shut off and left running for what he felt was the best performance/stability compromise.
 
http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/C.A.P.S.v2-Services.pdf
 
Oct 24, 2011 at 2:06 PM Post #14 of 69
Wait, so why exactly do running programs inexplicably degrade performance?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top