MarkyMark
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2004
- Posts
- 521
- Likes
- 12
The problem for me is that the WHF reviews are too sketchy. Personally, I want to see some proper lab measurements of the equipment as well as an in-depth review, not just a quick listen. Also, they tend to focus on the budget end of hi-fi which isn't where my interest lies.
Agree that they are no more susceptible to bias arising from advertising revenues than others since they are a big publication (perhaps the only obvious case I've detected was with Hi-Fi+ magazine and Nordost). Nevertheless, I don't really understand why Grado and Apple for example continue to sweep the boards at all levels given the strength of competition elsewhere. Regards Sony and the AV area, I have seen a lot of comments on AVforums complaining about a perceived bias so rightly or wrongly there is some feeling it exists.
Anyways, just my 2c. Cheers.
Agree that they are no more susceptible to bias arising from advertising revenues than others since they are a big publication (perhaps the only obvious case I've detected was with Hi-Fi+ magazine and Nordost). Nevertheless, I don't really understand why Grado and Apple for example continue to sweep the boards at all levels given the strength of competition elsewhere. Regards Sony and the AV area, I have seen a lot of comments on AVforums complaining about a perceived bias so rightly or wrongly there is some feeling it exists.
Anyways, just my 2c. Cheers.