Let me forward this by saying that i am not a major music buyer. I am 16 years old, and before i seriously start investing in music, i'd like to have a good, solid rig (and them some)
With that said, i will admit that i do use mp3's on a fairly regular basis. It provides a clearly inferior methiod of listening to music before i finally plunk down the change and buy the CD myself, or as i more commonly do, borrow from the library, and burn myself a copy.
Do i believe what i do is right? of course not. A major evil? nope. Simply put, i will not pay 20 dollars for a CD, outside of the rare SACD, which i feel in some ways, is nessairy to feed the market. The new formats are clearly superior in sound quality, and often is a consiteration for buying an album
I also have a moral objection to supporting the RIAA, and i have a feeling that it's only going to get worse. I don't especially like the concept of funding a company which only seeks to proscute me for downloading music.
Most people who download music aren't evil people who are just looking to screw over artists (sans metallica), they're people who want to get a feel for an album, and enjoy the music, which, ultimately, is the agenda for many musicans. After all, i dion't see many artists going out on their own free will, and protesting mp3 piracy (I believe a majority of those who speak out against it are being paid by their reccord company)
Ultimately, if i buy an album, i'm paying for the whole package, and i want it to be good for me to plunk down my hard earned cash. 2 or 3 good songs is not worth 20 dollars.
Just my .02