oknidius
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 11, 2014
- Posts
- 116
- Likes
- 34
Wondering if anyone who has experience with the Westone B50 and the Sennheiser IE 40 Pro could compare the two.
I know they’re in different leagues and price ranges. But I’m only interested in the sound comparison.
After spending obscene amounts in the past few years (including various expensive CIEMs and overpriced boutique universals, brand name and Chi-Fi DAPs and amps, and cables), I’ve - shockingly to most people here no doubt - settled on my endgame daily combo: the Sennheiser IE 40 Pro and - brace yourselves haters - an iPod Touch.
But once in a while the treble of the IE 40 Pro gets a tad too hot. Foam tips or EQ may or may not help. Depends on the recording. I have better things to do than change ear tips for every song.
So I remember fond memories of the Westone W80 (just not fond enough to justify the price tag to keep them) and less fond memories of the Westone W40 (thin, no body, no weight).
But Westone’s multi-driver offerings are amongst the very few I found coherent. In others brands, I hear significant imbalances between frequencies as they’re bounced around the different drivers. Where strings should be unified, they’ll sound harsh and almost distorted on some IEMs. As if the drivers are improperly synchronized.
In that regard, my current Westone ES60 are satisfying. But in other aspects, they’re not. Treble is simultaneously rolled off and shrill/screechy. Overall tone is metallic, yet paradoxically natural and authentic. Their biggest issue, is that regardless of the amp, they only sound good to me at unsafe volumes.
So I’m wondering if the Westone B50 might safeguard the Westone coherency and match a single dynamic driver in that regard, yet offer satisfying bass (deep, not bloated), more weight and body than the W40, but tone down the treble of the IE 40 Pro, while offering better isolation (which the IE 40 Pro offers very little of).
Since my musical tastes on any given day could easily jump between classical, rap, country, heavy metal, soundtracks and pop, I’m interested in something versatile. And before someone says the B50 is too bassy for classical, I love timpani, celli, trombones and double basses. I want to hear them as loud as trumpets and violins. Shostakovich‘s 7th symphony (1st movement) and Dvorak’s 9th (beginning of 4th movement) for example don’t have the same impact on bass-shy earphones as they do on weightier options.
Sorry for the long rant. I guess I’m just trying to explain where I’m coming from and why this strange B50 vs IE 40 Pro comparison request.
Many thanks!
I know they’re in different leagues and price ranges. But I’m only interested in the sound comparison.
After spending obscene amounts in the past few years (including various expensive CIEMs and overpriced boutique universals, brand name and Chi-Fi DAPs and amps, and cables), I’ve - shockingly to most people here no doubt - settled on my endgame daily combo: the Sennheiser IE 40 Pro and - brace yourselves haters - an iPod Touch.
But once in a while the treble of the IE 40 Pro gets a tad too hot. Foam tips or EQ may or may not help. Depends on the recording. I have better things to do than change ear tips for every song.
So I remember fond memories of the Westone W80 (just not fond enough to justify the price tag to keep them) and less fond memories of the Westone W40 (thin, no body, no weight).
But Westone’s multi-driver offerings are amongst the very few I found coherent. In others brands, I hear significant imbalances between frequencies as they’re bounced around the different drivers. Where strings should be unified, they’ll sound harsh and almost distorted on some IEMs. As if the drivers are improperly synchronized.
In that regard, my current Westone ES60 are satisfying. But in other aspects, they’re not. Treble is simultaneously rolled off and shrill/screechy. Overall tone is metallic, yet paradoxically natural and authentic. Their biggest issue, is that regardless of the amp, they only sound good to me at unsafe volumes.
So I’m wondering if the Westone B50 might safeguard the Westone coherency and match a single dynamic driver in that regard, yet offer satisfying bass (deep, not bloated), more weight and body than the W40, but tone down the treble of the IE 40 Pro, while offering better isolation (which the IE 40 Pro offers very little of).
Since my musical tastes on any given day could easily jump between classical, rap, country, heavy metal, soundtracks and pop, I’m interested in something versatile. And before someone says the B50 is too bassy for classical, I love timpani, celli, trombones and double basses. I want to hear them as loud as trumpets and violins. Shostakovich‘s 7th symphony (1st movement) and Dvorak’s 9th (beginning of 4th movement) for example don’t have the same impact on bass-shy earphones as they do on weightier options.
Sorry for the long rant. I guess I’m just trying to explain where I’m coming from and why this strange B50 vs IE 40 Pro comparison request.
Many thanks!
Last edited: