dougli
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 3, 2002
- Posts
- 543
- Likes
- 10
I've been wondering how the W100 sounds for some time now, and finally got a chance to hear one, with a few hundred hours of usage on it. I've settled on various other phones for regular listening, so I put the W100 up against my favorite three. These are admittedly rather quick impressions.
HFI-650: closed vs. semi-closed, but the level of isolation is much different. I'd call the W100 semi-open. While listening to Loreena McKennit (Celtic/folk), the W100 easily exhibited the reason for its price being 2 1/2 times that of the HFI-650. It was richer overall, and gave a more intimate presence. The 650 gives a good combination of isolation and portability plus decent sound. The W100 is a stay-at-home companion. But again, this is not a match of equals.
DT931: open vs. semi-closed. While listening to Nightwish (metal opera), the 931 was clearer, with crisper bass. It seemed to have an overall wider frequency range, with better highs of course. The W100 seemed to have a slightly-better mid-range, but I couldn't tell if this was actually because of its narrower overall range. The W100 sounded more cramped and confined than the 931.
HD600: open vs. semi-closed. While listening to Eva Cassidy (ballad, jazz), the HD600 had fuller highs. The bass seemed roughtly equal, as did the mids. But overall, the HD600 was smoother and more unrestrained, which made the bass and mids sound more pleasing, and gave them more presence. I did seem to detect a difference in Eva's voice with the W100, but I couldn't decide if it was better, or just different.
The W100 is easier to drive the the HD600 or DT931, and about the same as the HFI-650. Thus, it also can give decent sound without a headphone amp. But I found it less comfortable than the other phones, since the driver screens press agains my ears. I'd get one if it offered true closed can isolation, but then who knows what the sound would be. So, my money stays in my wallet, for now, anyway.
HFI-650: closed vs. semi-closed, but the level of isolation is much different. I'd call the W100 semi-open. While listening to Loreena McKennit (Celtic/folk), the W100 easily exhibited the reason for its price being 2 1/2 times that of the HFI-650. It was richer overall, and gave a more intimate presence. The 650 gives a good combination of isolation and portability plus decent sound. The W100 is a stay-at-home companion. But again, this is not a match of equals.
DT931: open vs. semi-closed. While listening to Nightwish (metal opera), the 931 was clearer, with crisper bass. It seemed to have an overall wider frequency range, with better highs of course. The W100 seemed to have a slightly-better mid-range, but I couldn't tell if this was actually because of its narrower overall range. The W100 sounded more cramped and confined than the 931.
HD600: open vs. semi-closed. While listening to Eva Cassidy (ballad, jazz), the HD600 had fuller highs. The bass seemed roughtly equal, as did the mids. But overall, the HD600 was smoother and more unrestrained, which made the bass and mids sound more pleasing, and gave them more presence. I did seem to detect a difference in Eva's voice with the W100, but I couldn't decide if it was better, or just different.
The W100 is easier to drive the the HD600 or DT931, and about the same as the HFI-650. Thus, it also can give decent sound without a headphone amp. But I found it less comfortable than the other phones, since the driver screens press agains my ears. I'd get one if it offered true closed can isolation, but then who knows what the sound would be. So, my money stays in my wallet, for now, anyway.