I've listened to the HE-R9 (very briefly), the HD650 (for about 25 min), and the Model One. @b0lt 0ns is correct in saying that the HD650 is probably going to work for most music because the mids are much more forward, this brings the vocals and instruments closer in. I like the VZR's primarily for the music I listen to. I listen to primarily electronic music, RnB, jazz, hip hop, metal; pretty much anything with content down in the sub-bass region and lots of drums. I don't remember much about the HE-R9 except that it had a lot of bass. I find that the Model One has a more "composed" soundstage in my opinion once the pads are broken in. The instruments, to me, sound like they're coming from actual points in space as opposed to just mostly left/right. For optimal sound, the pads need to be broken and the headphones must be placed on the head correctly. The quickest way to break in the pads is just to compress them against your head repeatedly, you'll know the pads are broken in once the outside corner of the pad starts to flatten diagonally. When putting them on, compress the pads a bit and position the acoustic transformer at an angle over your ear. You may also angle the headband forward or back to adjust the sound slightly to your tastes, or also rotate the earpad in relation to the cup hinge (I rotated the seam slightly above the screw). Attached is a paint drawing of how to properly wear the Model One. I like to listen to them with glasses, it seems to strengthen the bone conduction effect and bring in the mids. I also will mention I use the Sennheiser 3.5mm to 6.35mm adapter for my amp (I think it sounds slightly better/louder, it also appears to be physically smoother than the stock adapter).For those that have used an HD650 and the Model One, which do you prefer? Mainly using it for music listening and gaming. I currently have an HE-R9.
Focal headphones just don't have a lot of sub-bass which is what the VZR's excel at. People usually describe sub-bass as "boomy" or "slow" but the VZR's have pretty accurate transients, as in they aren't blurred, unless you have poor source gear. The bass notes start and end when they are supposed to. It's not peak transient capability, but its above average. I agree that they are killer at gaming/movies.the HD650 is significantly better for clarity. the VZR has recessed mids which is why they are good for EDM and since the quality of vocals in rap isnt really important and exaggerated bass is they also do well with that. the bass is a bit on the boomy side, if youve ever heard a focal headphone its like the opposite of their tight impact/slam.
gaming is really where VZR shine. they do great with directional sound among other things.
Went ahead and did what you said (-2.3dB @ Q3.8, 1.3dB @ Q1.9) and the headphones basically sounds a bit quieter and less spatious. The headphone does sound slightly "snappier" and has less reverb with the vocals and instruments. Kind of reaffirms my theory that the drivers are not actually slow, its just the way that the headphones interact with your ear. I have to turn up the volume a bit more with the EQ to get to a satisfactory listening level. It's a leaner, more in your face, less "airy" listen. Maybe a bit more nasally with the vocals. I did add back a bass shelf, 0.6dB @ Q1.5, to make it more fun. Even when turned back up to achieve the same "perceived volume level" the headphones sound a lot "fuller" and more engaging/immersive than other direct-firing cans I've had in my possession for extended periods of time [Hyper-X Cloud II (3 years), Beyerdynamic DT990 (2 years), Denon AH-D7200 (1.5 months)]The frequency response also seems to slightly back it up that this headphone does have slightly bit recessed mids but overall it's not too bad:
I think probably would help overall clarity to slightly lower ~300Hz (250Hz if you're limited to 10-band EQ) and if you prefer slightly more forward mids I'd assume slightly boosting the 1 ~ 4kHz range would probably work out well. As a general rule of the thumb, from my experience roughly boosting / cutting half of what it looks like it's needed looking at a frequency response measurement tends to sound balanced, so in this case 2 ~ 2.5dB cut on the EQ at 300Hz (what looks like a 5dB bump in the measurement) and maybe +1 ~ 1.5dB or so boost in the 1 - 4kHz could do it well.
Attachments
Last edited: