Hi everyone! I'm trying to decide between these two cables: I need to pair my DAC (SMSL D300) with the amplifier (SMSL HO200). I am not an expert on the subject and, to my surprise, I have found practically nothing about reviews or user impressions on those cables despite having searched the web and various forums for a long time.
Here my findings and subjective evaluations:
1) conductor material: OCC-7N Copper for the Equinox and "generic" OFC Copper for NF-S1. In this regard Wireworld cable seems better, although I think there is also to take into account gauge size: 24AWG for Equinox while I didn't found info for NF-S1
2) insulation & shields: polyethylene insulation + 2 silvered spiral shields + 2 ALU-PET foil shields for the NF-S1. Only "COMPOSILEX® 3" for the Equinox. Here it seems to me that ViaBlue cable offer the better protection: although Wireworld employs its own proprietary system, my subjective impression is that ViaBlue implementation is more "solid". I also found a couple of feedback by Wireworld cables users that said the cables sometimes suffered from interference, thus confirming my impression. Since I have a lot of computers and electronics devices all around, for me this is an important factor.
3) connectors: bronze, 24 carat real gold-plated for NF-S1. Silver-clad OFC for Equinox. Here, from my ignorant point of view, ViaBlue connector offer less performance/quality compared to the silver-clad OFC from Wireworld, BUT the gold plating guarantees practically unlimited duration, while the Wireworld cable plug could be subject to wear over time, for example by oxidation.
4) aesthetics: while I find ViaBlue cable to be gorgeous in every respect and conveys a sense of refinement, solidity and value, I find Wireworld cable absolutely UGLY...it also seems "cheap", both for the sleeving and the plugs (especially the plugs...)
5) price: here there is an absolute draw, as I can buy both cables for practically the same price, just under € 190.
Is there anyone who owns (has owned) at least one of these cables and can give me their impressions? Or someone who is able to provide me a technical opinion?
Thanks in advance!!!
Here my findings and subjective evaluations:
1) conductor material: OCC-7N Copper for the Equinox and "generic" OFC Copper for NF-S1. In this regard Wireworld cable seems better, although I think there is also to take into account gauge size: 24AWG for Equinox while I didn't found info for NF-S1
2) insulation & shields: polyethylene insulation + 2 silvered spiral shields + 2 ALU-PET foil shields for the NF-S1. Only "COMPOSILEX® 3" for the Equinox. Here it seems to me that ViaBlue cable offer the better protection: although Wireworld employs its own proprietary system, my subjective impression is that ViaBlue implementation is more "solid". I also found a couple of feedback by Wireworld cables users that said the cables sometimes suffered from interference, thus confirming my impression. Since I have a lot of computers and electronics devices all around, for me this is an important factor.
3) connectors: bronze, 24 carat real gold-plated for NF-S1. Silver-clad OFC for Equinox. Here, from my ignorant point of view, ViaBlue connector offer less performance/quality compared to the silver-clad OFC from Wireworld, BUT the gold plating guarantees practically unlimited duration, while the Wireworld cable plug could be subject to wear over time, for example by oxidation.
4) aesthetics: while I find ViaBlue cable to be gorgeous in every respect and conveys a sense of refinement, solidity and value, I find Wireworld cable absolutely UGLY...it also seems "cheap", both for the sleeving and the plugs (especially the plugs...)
5) price: here there is an absolute draw, as I can buy both cables for practically the same price, just under € 190.
Is there anyone who owns (has owned) at least one of these cables and can give me their impressions? Or someone who is able to provide me a technical opinion?
Thanks in advance!!!