Drover
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
- Posts
- 4
- Likes
- 0
Let's start with the usual qualifications:
First, I find the high bass/low midrange to be overdriven and muddled. (Maybe this is part of the "curve" that is built into these things?) Fortunately they do respond well to equalization, and that portion of the frequency response range can be cleaned up with the right EQ settings. Still, I'd rather not have to devote processing power to EQ just to correct what I consider a headphone deficiency, or at a minimum, a headphone peculiarity.
Second, I'm a little disappointed with the bass overall. My basis of comparison is a pair of Koss-built Radio Shack Pro 35A over-ear headphones that I bought for $30. The bass on the 35As seems more responsive and much cleaner throughout the low frequency ranges and delivers a better overall "punch" without being excessively "bass-y." Surely some of this can be attributed to driver size, but was I out of line to expect a pair of $100 in-ear headphones to at least come close to approximating the bass response of a pair of $30 over-ear headphones?
I will say the midrange and treble on the Vibes are remarkable. In fact it's disconcerting how truly bad some of my mp3s sound as the Vibes reveal imperfections that the 35A's don't. Even some of my 192kbps files that sound perfectly fine through the 35A's sound choppy through the Vibes. On this point, it seems the compression software used to create the files makes a huge difference.
Anyway, was I expecting too much from these headphones? Your thoughts are appreciated.
- This is the first pair of in-ear headphones I've owned so I'm new to this.
- I have not listened to other high-quality in-ear phones for a basis of comparison.
- Yes, I have "burned them in" for nearly 100 hours even as I remain skeptical of the whole concpet.
- Yes, they are "sealed" as I listen to them.
First, I find the high bass/low midrange to be overdriven and muddled. (Maybe this is part of the "curve" that is built into these things?) Fortunately they do respond well to equalization, and that portion of the frequency response range can be cleaned up with the right EQ settings. Still, I'd rather not have to devote processing power to EQ just to correct what I consider a headphone deficiency, or at a minimum, a headphone peculiarity.
Second, I'm a little disappointed with the bass overall. My basis of comparison is a pair of Koss-built Radio Shack Pro 35A over-ear headphones that I bought for $30. The bass on the 35As seems more responsive and much cleaner throughout the low frequency ranges and delivers a better overall "punch" without being excessively "bass-y." Surely some of this can be attributed to driver size, but was I out of line to expect a pair of $100 in-ear headphones to at least come close to approximating the bass response of a pair of $30 over-ear headphones?
I will say the midrange and treble on the Vibes are remarkable. In fact it's disconcerting how truly bad some of my mp3s sound as the Vibes reveal imperfections that the 35A's don't. Even some of my 192kbps files that sound perfectly fine through the 35A's sound choppy through the Vibes. On this point, it seems the compression software used to create the files makes a huge difference.
Anyway, was I expecting too much from these headphones? Your thoughts are appreciated.